{"title":"痴呆患者自主支持环境:一项基于证据的综述","authors":"Jiajing Li","doi":"10.1097/nr9.0000000000000036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: As one of the core principles of person-centered care, supporting the autonomy of residents with dementia has received increasing attention worldwide. Supportive physical environments play an important role in promoting autonomy in the everyday life of residents in care facilities. However, there is no universal definition for autonomy in everyday life nor focused research on autonomy-supportive environments. Thus, this study aims to systematically review the existing evidence of autonomy-supportive design features based on a synthesized concept analysis of autonomy in everyday life. Methods: A synthesized concept analysis on autonomy was conducted based on related definitions of autonomy in design guidelines and environmental assessment tools of elderly care facilities. Using keywords from the concept analysis, multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Dementia Design Info were used to carry out a systematic review of autonomy-supportive environmental design features for people with dementia. Additional guidelines and standards were manually searched. The design features supported by empirical studies and studies based on experts’ experience were extracted from the literature. The evidence intensity of each feature was assessed according to the quality and quantity of related studies. Results: Four domains of autonomy, freedom, independence, control, and choice emerged based on the concept analysis. Seventy-eight autonomy-supportive design features were extracted from the literature. Features are summarized into 8 categories: building layout, circulation space, living room, dining space, bathroom, bedroom, outdoor space, and details. Of design features, 60% in the category of building layout have been cross-validated by empirical studies, whereas only 25% of the overall design features have. Conclusions: The results of this review show that numerous design features of the physical environment can support the autonomy of people with dementia in the 4 domains. Features of building layout are well researched and the evidence intensity for the rest of design features still needs to be improved through future empirical studies.","PeriodicalId":73407,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autonomy-supportive environments for people with dementia: an evidence-based review\",\"authors\":\"Jiajing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/nr9.0000000000000036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: As one of the core principles of person-centered care, supporting the autonomy of residents with dementia has received increasing attention worldwide. Supportive physical environments play an important role in promoting autonomy in the everyday life of residents in care facilities. However, there is no universal definition for autonomy in everyday life nor focused research on autonomy-supportive environments. Thus, this study aims to systematically review the existing evidence of autonomy-supportive design features based on a synthesized concept analysis of autonomy in everyday life. Methods: A synthesized concept analysis on autonomy was conducted based on related definitions of autonomy in design guidelines and environmental assessment tools of elderly care facilities. Using keywords from the concept analysis, multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Dementia Design Info were used to carry out a systematic review of autonomy-supportive environmental design features for people with dementia. Additional guidelines and standards were manually searched. The design features supported by empirical studies and studies based on experts’ experience were extracted from the literature. The evidence intensity of each feature was assessed according to the quality and quantity of related studies. Results: Four domains of autonomy, freedom, independence, control, and choice emerged based on the concept analysis. Seventy-eight autonomy-supportive design features were extracted from the literature. Features are summarized into 8 categories: building layout, circulation space, living room, dining space, bathroom, bedroom, outdoor space, and details. Of design features, 60% in the category of building layout have been cross-validated by empirical studies, whereas only 25% of the overall design features have. Conclusions: The results of this review show that numerous design features of the physical environment can support the autonomy of people with dementia in the 4 domains. Features of building layout are well researched and the evidence intensity for the rest of design features still needs to be improved through future empirical studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary nursing research\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary nursing research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/nr9.0000000000000036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/nr9.0000000000000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要目的:作为以人为本的护理的核心原则之一,支持痴呆患者的自主性越来越受到世界各国的关注。支持性物理环境在促进护理机构居民日常生活中的自主性方面发挥着重要作用。然而,对于日常生活中的自主性,目前还没有一个通用的定义,也没有针对自主支持环境的重点研究。因此,本研究旨在基于日常生活中自主性的综合概念分析,系统地回顾自主支持设计特征的现有证据。方法:结合养老设施设计指南和环境评价工具中自主性的相关定义,对自主性进行综合概念分析。使用概念分析中的关键词,使用PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、PsycINFO和Dementia Design Info等多个数据库,对痴呆患者的自主支持环境设计特征进行系统回顾。手动搜索其他指导方针和标准。从文献中提取实证研究支持的设计特征和基于专家经验的研究。根据相关研究的质量和数量对各特征的证据强度进行评价。结果:在概念分析的基础上,出现了自主、自由、独立、控制和选择四个领域。从文献中提取了78个自主支持设计特征。特征归纳为8类:建筑布局、交通空间、客厅、餐厅空间、浴室、卧室、室外空间和细节。在设计特征中,60%的建筑布局类别经过了实证研究的交叉验证,而总体设计特征只有25%经过了实证研究的交叉验证。结论:本综述的结果表明,物理环境的许多设计特征可以支持痴呆患者在这四个领域的自主性。对建筑布局特征的研究比较充分,其余设计特征的证据强度有待于进一步的实证研究来提高。
Autonomy-supportive environments for people with dementia: an evidence-based review
Abstract Objective: As one of the core principles of person-centered care, supporting the autonomy of residents with dementia has received increasing attention worldwide. Supportive physical environments play an important role in promoting autonomy in the everyday life of residents in care facilities. However, there is no universal definition for autonomy in everyday life nor focused research on autonomy-supportive environments. Thus, this study aims to systematically review the existing evidence of autonomy-supportive design features based on a synthesized concept analysis of autonomy in everyday life. Methods: A synthesized concept analysis on autonomy was conducted based on related definitions of autonomy in design guidelines and environmental assessment tools of elderly care facilities. Using keywords from the concept analysis, multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Dementia Design Info were used to carry out a systematic review of autonomy-supportive environmental design features for people with dementia. Additional guidelines and standards were manually searched. The design features supported by empirical studies and studies based on experts’ experience were extracted from the literature. The evidence intensity of each feature was assessed according to the quality and quantity of related studies. Results: Four domains of autonomy, freedom, independence, control, and choice emerged based on the concept analysis. Seventy-eight autonomy-supportive design features were extracted from the literature. Features are summarized into 8 categories: building layout, circulation space, living room, dining space, bathroom, bedroom, outdoor space, and details. Of design features, 60% in the category of building layout have been cross-validated by empirical studies, whereas only 25% of the overall design features have. Conclusions: The results of this review show that numerous design features of the physical environment can support the autonomy of people with dementia in the 4 domains. Features of building layout are well researched and the evidence intensity for the rest of design features still needs to be improved through future empirical studies.