早期识别障碍学生成功的物理治疗临床教育:利用第一周临床调查工具

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2216
Bridget Eubanks, Jennifer Bunn, Heidi Shearin
{"title":"早期识别障碍学生成功的物理治疗临床教育:利用第一周临床调查工具","authors":"Bridget Eubanks, Jennifer Bunn, Heidi Shearin","doi":"10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a week-one clinical survey tool for early identification of student perceived barriers, including personal and environmental safety, that may impact success during full-time clinical education experiences (CEE) in physical therapy. Methods: DPT students (n= 81) engaged in full-time CEE in their second and third years were required to complete an online self-designed survey tool regarding perceptions of safety, clinical instructor (CI) satisfaction, and clinical challenges. Students in their third year completed the survey for both experiences. Data were assessed to compare second versus third-year student responses overall using a Mann-Whitney U test. Qualitative data was analyzed using an incident coding process. Results: Most students (65.1%) indicated high satisfaction with their CI (≥ 9 on a 10-pt scale). Two students (1.8%) indicated feeling unsafe. There were no differences between cohorts for perception of personal safety or completion of orientation, but there was a difference in rating of their experience with the CI (p = .008). Narrative responses revealed that students’ perceptions of CI personality characteristics were related to their overall CI satisfaction. There were no differences between cohorts or levels of CEE in overall qualitative themes from the open-ended questions, but there was a difference in the impact of each qualitative theme and associated subcategories. Conclusion: During the first week of a CEE, students reported high CI satisfaction and low personal and environmental safety concerns. Further research is needed to examine the perspective of other stakeholders with the utilization of this week-one clinical survey tool. The results of this study are the first to contribute an understanding of the barriers to success during the first week of a CEE from the students’ perspective.","PeriodicalId":45065,"journal":{"name":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Identification of Barriers to Student Success in Physical Therapy Clinical Education: Utilization of a Week One Clinical Survey Tool\",\"authors\":\"Bridget Eubanks, Jennifer Bunn, Heidi Shearin\",\"doi\":\"10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a week-one clinical survey tool for early identification of student perceived barriers, including personal and environmental safety, that may impact success during full-time clinical education experiences (CEE) in physical therapy. Methods: DPT students (n= 81) engaged in full-time CEE in their second and third years were required to complete an online self-designed survey tool regarding perceptions of safety, clinical instructor (CI) satisfaction, and clinical challenges. Students in their third year completed the survey for both experiences. Data were assessed to compare second versus third-year student responses overall using a Mann-Whitney U test. Qualitative data was analyzed using an incident coding process. Results: Most students (65.1%) indicated high satisfaction with their CI (≥ 9 on a 10-pt scale). Two students (1.8%) indicated feeling unsafe. There were no differences between cohorts for perception of personal safety or completion of orientation, but there was a difference in rating of their experience with the CI (p = .008). Narrative responses revealed that students’ perceptions of CI personality characteristics were related to their overall CI satisfaction. There were no differences between cohorts or levels of CEE in overall qualitative themes from the open-ended questions, but there was a difference in the impact of each qualitative theme and associated subcategories. Conclusion: During the first week of a CEE, students reported high CI satisfaction and low personal and environmental safety concerns. Further research is needed to examine the perspective of other stakeholders with the utilization of this week-one clinical survey tool. The results of this study are the first to contribute an understanding of the barriers to success during the first week of a CEE from the students’ perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估使用一个为期一周的临床调查工具来早期识别学生感知的障碍,包括个人和环境安全,这些障碍可能会影响全日制临床教育经历(CEE)物理治疗的成功。方法:DPT学生(n= 81)在二年级和三年级参加全日制CEE,要求他们完成一份关于安全感知、临床讲师(CI)满意度和临床挑战的在线自行设计的调查工具。三年级的学生完成了这两项经历的调查。使用曼-惠特尼U测试对数据进行评估,比较二年级和三年级学生的总体反应。定性数据分析使用事件编码过程。结果:大多数学生(65.1%)对他们的CI(10分制≥9)表示高度满意。两名学生(1.8%)表示感到不安全。在个人安全的感知或取向的完成方面,各队列之间没有差异,但在CI评分方面存在差异(p = 0.008)。叙事性反应显示,学生对CI人格特征的认知与其整体CI满意度相关。从开放式问题的总体定性主题来看,中东欧的队列或水平之间没有差异,但每个定性主题和相关子类别的影响存在差异。结论:在CEE的第一周,学生报告了高CI满意度和低个人和环境安全问题。需要进一步的研究来检查其他利益相关者的观点与利用这一周的临床调查工具。这项研究的结果是第一个从学生的角度来理解在高考第一周成功的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Identification of Barriers to Student Success in Physical Therapy Clinical Education: Utilization of a Week One Clinical Survey Tool
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a week-one clinical survey tool for early identification of student perceived barriers, including personal and environmental safety, that may impact success during full-time clinical education experiences (CEE) in physical therapy. Methods: DPT students (n= 81) engaged in full-time CEE in their second and third years were required to complete an online self-designed survey tool regarding perceptions of safety, clinical instructor (CI) satisfaction, and clinical challenges. Students in their third year completed the survey for both experiences. Data were assessed to compare second versus third-year student responses overall using a Mann-Whitney U test. Qualitative data was analyzed using an incident coding process. Results: Most students (65.1%) indicated high satisfaction with their CI (≥ 9 on a 10-pt scale). Two students (1.8%) indicated feeling unsafe. There were no differences between cohorts for perception of personal safety or completion of orientation, but there was a difference in rating of their experience with the CI (p = .008). Narrative responses revealed that students’ perceptions of CI personality characteristics were related to their overall CI satisfaction. There were no differences between cohorts or levels of CEE in overall qualitative themes from the open-ended questions, but there was a difference in the impact of each qualitative theme and associated subcategories. Conclusion: During the first week of a CEE, students reported high CI satisfaction and low personal and environmental safety concerns. Further research is needed to examine the perspective of other stakeholders with the utilization of this week-one clinical survey tool. The results of this study are the first to contribute an understanding of the barriers to success during the first week of a CEE from the students’ perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
DTSaM を用いた橈骨遠位端骨折の治療成績 スマートフォンを用いた反張膝の測定方法に対する予備的研究 自閉スペクトラム症児における日本版感覚プロファイルを用いた感覚反応に対する幼児と学齢児の比較 介護老人保健施設における日常生活動作能力と転帰先との関連性 Effectiveness of WiiⓇ-based rehabilitation in Patients with Brain Tumors:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1