运动教练更看重专业认证的内在奖励,而不是障碍和外在奖励

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2263
Michael Hudson, Eva Frank, Taylor Harper, Lundsey Corner, Kelsey LaMont
{"title":"运动教练更看重专业认证的内在奖励,而不是障碍和外在奖励","authors":"Michael Hudson, Eva Frank, Taylor Harper, Lundsey Corner, Kelsey LaMont","doi":"10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Health care professionals may earn specialty certifications to recognize their advanced knowledge and skills. Athletic training has implemented specialties; however, it is unclear what athletic trainers (ATs) know and perceive about specialty certifications. We developed a survey to examine the following issues: (1) analyze what ATs know about specialty certifications; (2) rank the rewards and barriers ATs perceive to be associated with earning/pursuing specialty certifications; and (3) examine differences in these findings based on ATs state practice acts being more restrictive or less restrictive. Method: We utilized a nonequivalent group, cross-sectional survey design and collected data for one month using an online survey and e-mail recruitment process. We validated our instrument using the content validity index. We utilized qualitative data analysis techniques to group states as having more restrictive practice acts and less restrictive practice acts. Using a single stage cluster sampling process, we selected 3 more-restrictive states and 3 less-restrictive states and sent recruitment emails to 4,503 potential participants in these 6 states. We received 342 responses for a 7.6% response rate and an 87% completion rate. Results: Our analysis demonstrated practicing ATs have limited knowledge about specialty certifications. The differences in state practice act restrictions did not affect the perceived rewards or barriers for specialty certifications; however, the participants reported statistically significant differences in their agreement about the intrinsic rewards, barriers, and extrinsic rewards, respectively. Conclusions: ATs have limited knowledge about specialty certifications, and the level of state practice act restriction did not influence perceptions about their potential rewards and barriers. Participants ranked the proposed intrinsic rewards for earning a specialty certification highest, and the potential barriers for earning these credentials second highest. Participants perceived the potential extrinsic rewards of these credentials lowest.","PeriodicalId":45065,"journal":{"name":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Athletic Trainers Value the Intrinsic Rewards of Specialty Certifications More than Barriers and Extrinsic Rewards\",\"authors\":\"Michael Hudson, Eva Frank, Taylor Harper, Lundsey Corner, Kelsey LaMont\",\"doi\":\"10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Health care professionals may earn specialty certifications to recognize their advanced knowledge and skills. Athletic training has implemented specialties; however, it is unclear what athletic trainers (ATs) know and perceive about specialty certifications. We developed a survey to examine the following issues: (1) analyze what ATs know about specialty certifications; (2) rank the rewards and barriers ATs perceive to be associated with earning/pursuing specialty certifications; and (3) examine differences in these findings based on ATs state practice acts being more restrictive or less restrictive. Method: We utilized a nonequivalent group, cross-sectional survey design and collected data for one month using an online survey and e-mail recruitment process. We validated our instrument using the content validity index. We utilized qualitative data analysis techniques to group states as having more restrictive practice acts and less restrictive practice acts. Using a single stage cluster sampling process, we selected 3 more-restrictive states and 3 less-restrictive states and sent recruitment emails to 4,503 potential participants in these 6 states. We received 342 responses for a 7.6% response rate and an 87% completion rate. Results: Our analysis demonstrated practicing ATs have limited knowledge about specialty certifications. The differences in state practice act restrictions did not affect the perceived rewards or barriers for specialty certifications; however, the participants reported statistically significant differences in their agreement about the intrinsic rewards, barriers, and extrinsic rewards, respectively. Conclusions: ATs have limited knowledge about specialty certifications, and the level of state practice act restriction did not influence perceptions about their potential rewards and barriers. Participants ranked the proposed intrinsic rewards for earning a specialty certification highest, and the potential barriers for earning these credentials second highest. Participants perceived the potential extrinsic rewards of these credentials lowest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:卫生保健专业人员可以获得专业证书,以承认他们的先进知识和技能。体育训练实行特色化;然而,目前尚不清楚运动教练(at)对专业认证的了解和认知。我们开展了一项调查来研究以下问题:(1)分析ATs对专业认证的了解程度;(2)对获得/追求专业证书所面临的奖励和障碍进行排名;(3)根据美国州实践行为的限制性更强或限制性更弱来检验这些发现的差异。方法:我们采用非等量组,横断面调查设计,并通过在线调查和电子邮件招聘流程收集了一个月的数据。我们使用内容效度指数验证了我们的仪器。我们利用定性数据分析技术将国家划分为具有更多限制性实践行为和较少限制性实践行为的国家。采用单阶段聚类抽样方法,我们选择了3个限制更严格的州和3个限制更宽松的州,并向这6个州的4503名潜在参与者发送了招聘邮件。我们收到了342份回复,回复率为7.6%,完成率为87%。结果:我们的分析表明执业助理医师对专业认证的了解有限。州实践法案限制的差异不影响专业认证的感知奖励或障碍;然而,参与者分别报告了他们对内在奖励、障碍和外在奖励的认同在统计上有显著差异。结论:注册会计师对专业认证的了解有限,国家执业行为限制的水平并不影响他们对潜在奖励和障碍的看法。参与者认为获得专业证书的内在奖励最高,获得这些证书的潜在障碍次之。参与者认为这些证书的潜在外在奖励最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Athletic Trainers Value the Intrinsic Rewards of Specialty Certifications More than Barriers and Extrinsic Rewards
Purpose: Health care professionals may earn specialty certifications to recognize their advanced knowledge and skills. Athletic training has implemented specialties; however, it is unclear what athletic trainers (ATs) know and perceive about specialty certifications. We developed a survey to examine the following issues: (1) analyze what ATs know about specialty certifications; (2) rank the rewards and barriers ATs perceive to be associated with earning/pursuing specialty certifications; and (3) examine differences in these findings based on ATs state practice acts being more restrictive or less restrictive. Method: We utilized a nonequivalent group, cross-sectional survey design and collected data for one month using an online survey and e-mail recruitment process. We validated our instrument using the content validity index. We utilized qualitative data analysis techniques to group states as having more restrictive practice acts and less restrictive practice acts. Using a single stage cluster sampling process, we selected 3 more-restrictive states and 3 less-restrictive states and sent recruitment emails to 4,503 potential participants in these 6 states. We received 342 responses for a 7.6% response rate and an 87% completion rate. Results: Our analysis demonstrated practicing ATs have limited knowledge about specialty certifications. The differences in state practice act restrictions did not affect the perceived rewards or barriers for specialty certifications; however, the participants reported statistically significant differences in their agreement about the intrinsic rewards, barriers, and extrinsic rewards, respectively. Conclusions: ATs have limited knowledge about specialty certifications, and the level of state practice act restriction did not influence perceptions about their potential rewards and barriers. Participants ranked the proposed intrinsic rewards for earning a specialty certification highest, and the potential barriers for earning these credentials second highest. Participants perceived the potential extrinsic rewards of these credentials lowest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
DTSaM を用いた橈骨遠位端骨折の治療成績 スマートフォンを用いた反張膝の測定方法に対する予備的研究 自閉スペクトラム症児における日本版感覚プロファイルを用いた感覚反応に対する幼児と学齢児の比較 介護老人保健施設における日常生活動作能力と転帰先との関連性 Effectiveness of WiiⓇ-based rehabilitation in Patients with Brain Tumors:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1