海马疗法治疗慢性腰痛的鞍座比较

Q3 Veterinary Veterinary Integrative Sciences Pub Date : 2023-05-10 DOI:10.12982/vis.2023.058
Wirintorn Ruamsilp, Nuanlaor Thawinchai, Patraporn Sitilertpisan, Siriporn Peansukmanee, Samatchai Chamnongkich
{"title":"海马疗法治疗慢性腰痛的鞍座比较","authors":"Wirintorn Ruamsilp, Nuanlaor Thawinchai, Patraporn Sitilertpisan, Siriporn Peansukmanee, Samatchai Chamnongkich","doi":"10.12982/vis.2023.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic low back pain (CLBP) significantly impacts daily life. Currently, hippotherapy on a robotic horse has been shown to decrease pain and disability in low back pain. However, live horses and different types of saddles used during hippotherapy may have various therapeutic effects. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the standard all-purpose saddle and the pad saddle used in live horse hippotherapy for individuals with CLBP. Ten participants with CLBP were assessed pain level using the visual analog scale (VAS) and lumbopelvic mobility using the Schober test and inertia measurement unit (IMU) before and after each saddle, with a one-week interval between saddles and a 20-minute hippotherapy session. The dependent t-test, with a significance level of 0.05, was conducted to compare the percentage change of each variable between two saddles. The result showed that the standard saddles significantly reduced pain levels (p <0.001) and increased pelvic range (p<0.05) greater than applied pad saddles in participants with chronic LBP. Therefore, the standard all-purpose saddle is more beneficial than the applied pad saddle for individuals with chronic LBP undergoing hippotherapy.","PeriodicalId":36378,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Integrative Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of saddles in hippotherapy for patients with chronic low back pain\",\"authors\":\"Wirintorn Ruamsilp, Nuanlaor Thawinchai, Patraporn Sitilertpisan, Siriporn Peansukmanee, Samatchai Chamnongkich\",\"doi\":\"10.12982/vis.2023.058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chronic low back pain (CLBP) significantly impacts daily life. Currently, hippotherapy on a robotic horse has been shown to decrease pain and disability in low back pain. However, live horses and different types of saddles used during hippotherapy may have various therapeutic effects. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the standard all-purpose saddle and the pad saddle used in live horse hippotherapy for individuals with CLBP. Ten participants with CLBP were assessed pain level using the visual analog scale (VAS) and lumbopelvic mobility using the Schober test and inertia measurement unit (IMU) before and after each saddle, with a one-week interval between saddles and a 20-minute hippotherapy session. The dependent t-test, with a significance level of 0.05, was conducted to compare the percentage change of each variable between two saddles. The result showed that the standard saddles significantly reduced pain levels (p <0.001) and increased pelvic range (p<0.05) greater than applied pad saddles in participants with chronic LBP. Therefore, the standard all-purpose saddle is more beneficial than the applied pad saddle for individuals with chronic LBP undergoing hippotherapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Integrative Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Integrative Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12982/vis.2023.058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Veterinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Integrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12982/vis.2023.058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性腰痛(CLBP)严重影响日常生活。目前,在机器马身上进行的海马疗法已被证明可以减轻腰痛和残疾。然而,在海马疗法中使用的活马和不同类型的马鞍可能有不同的治疗效果。因此,本研究的目的是比较CLBP患者活体马海马治疗中使用的标准通用马鞍和垫马鞍。10名CLBP患者在每次骑鞍前后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛水平,使用Schober测试和惯性测量单元(IMU)评估腰骨盆活动度,骑鞍间隔一周和20分钟的海马疗法。采用相关t检验比较两鞍座间各变量的变化百分比,显著性水平为0.05。结果显示,在慢性腰痛患者中,标准鞍座显著降低了疼痛水平(p< 0.001),并增加了骨盆范围(p<0.05)。因此,对于接受海马疗法的慢性腰痛患者,标准的通用鞍座比应用垫式鞍座更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of saddles in hippotherapy for patients with chronic low back pain
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) significantly impacts daily life. Currently, hippotherapy on a robotic horse has been shown to decrease pain and disability in low back pain. However, live horses and different types of saddles used during hippotherapy may have various therapeutic effects. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the standard all-purpose saddle and the pad saddle used in live horse hippotherapy for individuals with CLBP. Ten participants with CLBP were assessed pain level using the visual analog scale (VAS) and lumbopelvic mobility using the Schober test and inertia measurement unit (IMU) before and after each saddle, with a one-week interval between saddles and a 20-minute hippotherapy session. The dependent t-test, with a significance level of 0.05, was conducted to compare the percentage change of each variable between two saddles. The result showed that the standard saddles significantly reduced pain levels (p <0.001) and increased pelvic range (p<0.05) greater than applied pad saddles in participants with chronic LBP. Therefore, the standard all-purpose saddle is more beneficial than the applied pad saddle for individuals with chronic LBP undergoing hippotherapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Integrative Sciences
Veterinary Integrative Sciences Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Molecular characterization and identification of African Swine Fever virus isolates from emerging cases of infection in Central Luzon, Philippines Isolation and identification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from houseflies (Musca domestica L) at cattle barns in Al-Qadisiyah Province, Iraq Epidemiological and molecular characteristics of Infectious bursal disease virus naturally infected in the broiler flocks in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam during 2015 and 2018 Clinical and pathologic characterization of African swine fever virus infection in pigs in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam Cattle fetal sex determination using cell-free fetal DNA from maternal blood in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1