欧洲高等教育区的联合课程质量实践

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quality in Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1080/13538322.2023.2267722
Lina Zenkienė
{"title":"欧洲高等教育区的联合课程质量实践","authors":"Lina Zenkienė","doi":"10.1080/13538322.2023.2267722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe developments of joint study programmes and their quality practice in the European Higher Education Area are studied. Such programmes are subject to the environment of institutional complexity. Guided by a multi-level approach and the institutional work framework of analysis, the research demonstrates how a particular quality practice is co-created and maintained by the means of policy work, inter-organisational cooperation and everyday work. The relational nature of quality practice is driven by a recursive interaction of processes, events and activities at macro-meso-micro levels. The joint programme quality practice is tied to the concept of fitness-for-purpose with focus on value-added and innovation. The situated nature of quality work is explicated through the empirical account of day-to-day activities and the practical-evaluative agency of joint programme staff. The idealised value of ‘jointness’ in curriculum integration and joint degree award, and quality evaluation culture are addressed with organisational adaptations in a cross-border context.Keywords: Joint programmesqualitycross-border higher educationinstitutional workinstitutional complexityagency AcknowledgmentsThe paper is based on the doctoral work Institutional work of quality in higher education: A study of cross-border joint programmes defended in 2020 at the University of Ghent, Belgium.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":46354,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint programme quality practice in the European Higher Education Area\",\"authors\":\"Lina Zenkienė\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13538322.2023.2267722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe developments of joint study programmes and their quality practice in the European Higher Education Area are studied. Such programmes are subject to the environment of institutional complexity. Guided by a multi-level approach and the institutional work framework of analysis, the research demonstrates how a particular quality practice is co-created and maintained by the means of policy work, inter-organisational cooperation and everyday work. The relational nature of quality practice is driven by a recursive interaction of processes, events and activities at macro-meso-micro levels. The joint programme quality practice is tied to the concept of fitness-for-purpose with focus on value-added and innovation. The situated nature of quality work is explicated through the empirical account of day-to-day activities and the practical-evaluative agency of joint programme staff. The idealised value of ‘jointness’ in curriculum integration and joint degree award, and quality evaluation culture are addressed with organisational adaptations in a cross-border context.Keywords: Joint programmesqualitycross-border higher educationinstitutional workinstitutional complexityagency AcknowledgmentsThe paper is based on the doctoral work Institutional work of quality in higher education: A study of cross-border joint programmes defended in 2020 at the University of Ghent, Belgium.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2023.2267722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2023.2267722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文研究了欧洲高等教育区联合学习项目的发展及其质量实践。这类方案受制于体制复杂性的环境。在多层次方法和制度工作分析框架的指导下,该研究展示了如何通过政策工作、组织间合作和日常工作的方式共同创造和维持特定的质量实践。质量实践的关系本质是由过程、事件和活动在宏观-中观-微观层面的递归相互作用驱动的。联合课程质量实践与注重增值和创新的健身目的概念相联系。通过日常活动的经验说明和联合方案工作人员的实际评价机构,说明了高质量工作的情境性质。“联合”在课程整合和联合学位授予中的理想价值,以及质量评估文化,在跨国界的背景下通过组织适应来解决。关键词:联合项目质量跨境高等教育机构工作机构复杂性机构致谢本文基于博士工作高等教育质量机构工作:比利时根特大学2020年跨境联合项目研究。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Joint programme quality practice in the European Higher Education Area
AbstractThe developments of joint study programmes and their quality practice in the European Higher Education Area are studied. Such programmes are subject to the environment of institutional complexity. Guided by a multi-level approach and the institutional work framework of analysis, the research demonstrates how a particular quality practice is co-created and maintained by the means of policy work, inter-organisational cooperation and everyday work. The relational nature of quality practice is driven by a recursive interaction of processes, events and activities at macro-meso-micro levels. The joint programme quality practice is tied to the concept of fitness-for-purpose with focus on value-added and innovation. The situated nature of quality work is explicated through the empirical account of day-to-day activities and the practical-evaluative agency of joint programme staff. The idealised value of ‘jointness’ in curriculum integration and joint degree award, and quality evaluation culture are addressed with organisational adaptations in a cross-border context.Keywords: Joint programmesqualitycross-border higher educationinstitutional workinstitutional complexityagency AcknowledgmentsThe paper is based on the doctoral work Institutional work of quality in higher education: A study of cross-border joint programmes defended in 2020 at the University of Ghent, Belgium.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality in Higher Education
Quality in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Quality in Higher Education is aimed at those interested in the theory, practice and policies relating to the control, management and improvement of quality in higher education. The journal is receptive to critical, phenomenological as well as positivistic studies. The journal would like to publish more studies that use hermeneutic, semiotic, ethnographic or dialectical research as well as the more traditional studies based on quantitative surveys and in-depth interviews and focus groups. Papers that have empirical research content are particularly welcome. The editor especially wishes to encourage papers on: reported research results, especially where these assess the impact of quality assurance systems, procedures and methodologies; theoretical analyses of quality and quality initiatives in higher education; comparative evaluation and international aspects of practice and policy with a view to identifying transportable methods, systems and good practice; quality assurance and standards monitoring of transnational higher education; the nature and impact and student feedback; improvements in learning and teaching that impact on quality and standards; links between quality assurance and employability; evaluations of the impact of quality procedures at national level, backed up by research evidence.
期刊最新文献
What have we learned from 30 years of Quality in Higher Education: academics’ views of quality assurance Extended Editorial: Defining quality thirty years on: quality, standards, assurance, culture and epistemology Student involvement in quality assurance: perspectives and practices towards persistent partnerships Implementing quality assurance in tertiary-level colleges in Bangladesh: readiness and leadership support Quality assurance dysfunctions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1