从行动到交易:实用主义及其代理概念对发展研究与实践的启示

IF 0.2 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.363
Pablo Garcés-Velástegui
{"title":"从行动到交易:实用主义及其代理概念对发展研究与实践的启示","authors":"Pablo Garcés-Velástegui","doi":"10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Development suggests the notion of «good change» and its research and practice are about bringing it to fruition. Perhaps, because of this emphasis on application, relatively less attention has been given to philosophical issues, although shedding more light on the latter can contribute to the former. Positivism and, to a lesser extent, constructivism, with their advantages and disadvantages, have dominated the field. Against this conventional dichotomy, this article argues in favour of philosophical classic pragmatism as an alternative and does so employing philosophical ontology. From this perspective, pragmatism adheres to mind-world monism and phenomenalism. As such, it demands healthy awareness and criticism of preferences and biases, whether personal or contextual, in the self and in the subjects of interest. It entails a call for plurality, to harness practical reason to solve practical problems, turning indeterminate situations into determinate ones, thereby generating warranted assertions.","PeriodicalId":41614,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies","volume":"30 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From action to transaction: some implications of pragmatism and its concept of agency for development research and practice\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Garcés-Velástegui\",\"doi\":\"10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Development suggests the notion of «good change» and its research and practice are about bringing it to fruition. Perhaps, because of this emphasis on application, relatively less attention has been given to philosophical issues, although shedding more light on the latter can contribute to the former. Positivism and, to a lesser extent, constructivism, with their advantages and disadvantages, have dominated the field. Against this conventional dichotomy, this article argues in favour of philosophical classic pragmatism as an alternative and does so employing philosophical ontology. From this perspective, pragmatism adheres to mind-world monism and phenomenalism. As such, it demands healthy awareness and criticism of preferences and biases, whether personal or contextual, in the self and in the subjects of interest. It entails a call for plurality, to harness practical reason to solve practical problems, turning indeterminate situations into determinate ones, thereby generating warranted assertions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

发展表明,“好的改变”的概念及其研究和实践都是为了使其开花结果。也许,由于这种对应用的强调,对哲学问题的关注相对较少,尽管对后者的更多了解有助于前者。实证主义和(在较小程度上)建构主义各有优缺点,主导了这一领域。反对这种传统的二分法,本文主张支持哲学经典实用主义作为一种选择,并采用哲学本体论。从这个角度看,实用主义坚持心世界一元论和现象论。因此,它要求健康地认识和批评偏好和偏见,无论是个人的还是环境的,在自我和感兴趣的主题上。它需要对多元性的呼吁,利用实践理性来解决实际问题,把不确定的情况变成确定的情况,从而产生有根据的主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From action to transaction: some implications of pragmatism and its concept of agency for development research and practice
Development suggests the notion of «good change» and its research and practice are about bringing it to fruition. Perhaps, because of this emphasis on application, relatively less attention has been given to philosophical issues, although shedding more light on the latter can contribute to the former. Positivism and, to a lesser extent, constructivism, with their advantages and disadvantages, have dominated the field. Against this conventional dichotomy, this article argues in favour of philosophical classic pragmatism as an alternative and does so employing philosophical ontology. From this perspective, pragmatism adheres to mind-world monism and phenomenalism. As such, it demands healthy awareness and criticism of preferences and biases, whether personal or contextual, in the self and in the subjects of interest. It entails a call for plurality, to harness practical reason to solve practical problems, turning indeterminate situations into determinate ones, thereby generating warranted assertions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Ibero-American Journal of Development Studies publishes high quality multidisciplinary research on development, understood as the social, economic, political, cultural and technological process of change. This kind of development has to provide more and fair equality of opportunities to everyone, and thus to enable the development of all its potentials. It has also to preserve for future generations the access and use of natural resources, environment and cultural heritage. Papers can have a theoretical, empirical, or public policy focus. They have to present the results of original research, with clear arguments, empirical evidence and a high quality writing style. The intended audience of the journal includes development academics, researchers and practitioners in a multidisciplinary scope. This scope includes Legal and Social Science, Health Science, Fundamental Science, Arts and Humanities, or Engineering and Architecture.
期刊最新文献
Comercio internacional en el Sur Global. Jerarquías, conexiones y agrupaciones a través del análisis de redes sociales Legal foundations of crowdlending: from mutual agreement to lending via online platforms Las cadenas globales de producción en el marco de la disputa hegemónica mundial. Consideraciones para el desarrollo de América Latina Agricultural support policies and GHG emissions from agriculture in Latin America: relationships and policy implications for climate change Aspectos diferenciales del trabajo colaborativo en nuevas experiencias de cooperativismo en la economía social y solidaria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1