{"title":"双喹fosol钠联合M22优化脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍所致干眼症的疗效观察","authors":"Xiaodan Huang, Degui Wang, Dusheng Lin, Zhaotao Zhou","doi":"10.4314/tjpr.v22i10.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To determine the efficacy and safety of 3 % diquafosol sodium combined with M22 optimized pulse light (OPT) in the treatment of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
 Methods: Data from 97 dry eye patients admitted to Shantou Balder Eye Hospital with MGD-induced dry eye illness between August 2019 and June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients meeting MGD diagnostic criteria in ophthalmology and exhibiting MGD-induced dry eye signs were split into two groups. The medication group (43 cases) received 3 % diquafosol sodium eye drops six times a day for three months, while the pulsed light group (44 cases) underwent three M22 OPT sessions at one-month intervals. Treatment efficacy of the two methods were compared by assessing changes in ocular surface, symptom severity, inflammatory factors (hs-CRP, IL-8, IL-1β), and quality of life before and three months after treatment commenced. Adverse reactions were also recorded.
 Results: Pulsed light group showed a slightly higher (but not significant) total effective rate (95.45 %) than the medication group (93.02 %; p > 0.05). Three months post-treatment, both groups exhibited significant improvements in various indicators such as FL, OSDI, symptom scores, tear biomarker levels, and overall eye health (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the medication (4.65 %) and pulsed light (9.09 %) groups.
 Conclusion: Treatment with 3 % diquafosol sodium and M22 OPT for MGD-induced dry eye yields comparable efficacy and safety, improving symptoms, ocular surface function, reducing inflammation, and enhancing quality of life. However, 3 % diquafosol sodium shows better patient tolerance and fewer adverse reactions, but further research is needed due to the limited number of patients in this study.","PeriodicalId":23347,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"89 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of diquafosol sodium combined with M22 optimized pulsed light in the treatment of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodan Huang, Degui Wang, Dusheng Lin, Zhaotao Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/tjpr.v22i10.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To determine the efficacy and safety of 3 % diquafosol sodium combined with M22 optimized pulse light (OPT) in the treatment of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
 Methods: Data from 97 dry eye patients admitted to Shantou Balder Eye Hospital with MGD-induced dry eye illness between August 2019 and June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients meeting MGD diagnostic criteria in ophthalmology and exhibiting MGD-induced dry eye signs were split into two groups. The medication group (43 cases) received 3 % diquafosol sodium eye drops six times a day for three months, while the pulsed light group (44 cases) underwent three M22 OPT sessions at one-month intervals. Treatment efficacy of the two methods were compared by assessing changes in ocular surface, symptom severity, inflammatory factors (hs-CRP, IL-8, IL-1β), and quality of life before and three months after treatment commenced. Adverse reactions were also recorded.
 Results: Pulsed light group showed a slightly higher (but not significant) total effective rate (95.45 %) than the medication group (93.02 %; p > 0.05). Three months post-treatment, both groups exhibited significant improvements in various indicators such as FL, OSDI, symptom scores, tear biomarker levels, and overall eye health (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the medication (4.65 %) and pulsed light (9.09 %) groups.
 Conclusion: Treatment with 3 % diquafosol sodium and M22 OPT for MGD-induced dry eye yields comparable efficacy and safety, improving symptoms, ocular surface function, reducing inflammation, and enhancing quality of life. However, 3 % diquafosol sodium shows better patient tolerance and fewer adverse reactions, but further research is needed due to the limited number of patients in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":\"89 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v22i10.18\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v22i10.18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of diquafosol sodium combined with M22 optimized pulsed light in the treatment of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction
Purpose: To determine the efficacy and safety of 3 % diquafosol sodium combined with M22 optimized pulse light (OPT) in the treatment of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
Methods: Data from 97 dry eye patients admitted to Shantou Balder Eye Hospital with MGD-induced dry eye illness between August 2019 and June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients meeting MGD diagnostic criteria in ophthalmology and exhibiting MGD-induced dry eye signs were split into two groups. The medication group (43 cases) received 3 % diquafosol sodium eye drops six times a day for three months, while the pulsed light group (44 cases) underwent three M22 OPT sessions at one-month intervals. Treatment efficacy of the two methods were compared by assessing changes in ocular surface, symptom severity, inflammatory factors (hs-CRP, IL-8, IL-1β), and quality of life before and three months after treatment commenced. Adverse reactions were also recorded.
Results: Pulsed light group showed a slightly higher (but not significant) total effective rate (95.45 %) than the medication group (93.02 %; p > 0.05). Three months post-treatment, both groups exhibited significant improvements in various indicators such as FL, OSDI, symptom scores, tear biomarker levels, and overall eye health (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the medication (4.65 %) and pulsed light (9.09 %) groups.
Conclusion: Treatment with 3 % diquafosol sodium and M22 OPT for MGD-induced dry eye yields comparable efficacy and safety, improving symptoms, ocular surface function, reducing inflammation, and enhancing quality of life. However, 3 % diquafosol sodium shows better patient tolerance and fewer adverse reactions, but further research is needed due to the limited number of patients in this study.
期刊介绍:
We seek to encourage pharmaceutical and allied research of tropical and international relevance and to foster multidisciplinary research and collaboration among scientists, the pharmaceutical industry and the healthcare professionals.
We publish articles in pharmaceutical sciences and related disciplines (including biotechnology, cell and molecular biology, drug utilization including adverse drug events, medical and other life sciences, and related engineering fields). Although primarily devoted to original research papers, we welcome reviews on current topics of special interest and relevance.