{"title":"探讨分析师在识别和传达银行社会责任活动价值方面的作用","authors":"Ruwan Adikaram, Alex Holcomb","doi":"10.1108/ijbm-12-2022-0557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn this study, the authors investigate if analysts, as knowledgeable information intermediaries, can correctly identify bank corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities and can reliably transmit that information to investors. Hence, the authors specifically explore if analysts perceive and behave differentially in the presence of genuine bank CSR activities (strengths). The authors also analyze if financial markets differentially assess bank CSR strengths. The authors further explore the viability of focusing on analyst and financial markets to validate genuine bank CSR strengths.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use COMPUSTAT and CRSP for firm and financial data, I/B/E/S for analyst reporting data and MCSI Research KLD for CSR data. The sample consists of 329 distinct banks and 2,525 bank-year observations from 2003 to 2016. The primary CSR score is the total number of CSR strengths less the total number of CSR concerns, across six of the seven dimensions for each firm in each year of the sample (Adjusted CSR Score). In addition, the authors estimate all the analyses with dis-aggregated measures of total CSR strengths and total CSR concerns (Adjusted Total Strength Score).FindingsThe authors find that analysts correctly distinguish and construe bank CSR strengths from CSR concerns. Specifically, bank CSR strengths increase analyst following and forecast accuracy, while decreasing analyst forecast dispersion. The authors further find that bank CSR strengths increase bank market returns. These results are reversed for bank CSR concerns. Additionally, the authors demonstrate that this method using knowledgeable intermediaries can help validate bank CSR strengths.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample is limited to US banks and financial markets. The regulatory and information environment is likely to be different from global or emerging markets. However, since banks in many countries aspire to emulate the US banks, these results would be a precursor of banking sectors conditions in emerging markets. Additionally, the availability of data limits the sample to a period that ends in 2016. To the extent that the importance of ESG and CSR concerns has increased in the intervening time, the results may not accurately reflect the current state of the market.Practical implicationsThis investigation benefits researchers, customers, banking executives, regulators and activist groups. First, the authors show that in addition to customers, analysts and the financial markets appreciate bank CSR strengths. Second, despite sophisticated financial reporting by banks, analysts correctly distinguish and construe bank CSR strengths. Third, the authors demonstrate a method for bank marketing researchers to validate genuine bank CSR activity, as well as provide additional support for customer related bank CSR outcomes. Fourth, the findings highlight the importance for banks to have high-quality CSR reporting. This might be especially helpful to a bank rebuilding its reputation after a CSR failure. Finally, this investigation using US banks could serve as a precursor for future bank CSR research and help develop CSR reporting guidelines for banks in emerging economies.Social implicationsThis investigation benefits researchers, customers, banking executives, regulators and activist groups.Originality/valueThis investigation benefits researchers, customers, banking executives, regulators and activist groups. First, the authors show that in addition to customers, analysts and the financial market appreciates bank CSR strengths. Second, despite sophisticated financial reporting by banks, analysts correctly distinguish and construe bank CSR strengths. Third, the authors demonstrate a method for bank marketing researchers to validate genuine bank CSR activity, as well as provide additional support for customer related bank CSR outcomes. Fourth, the findings highlight the importance for banks to have high-quality CSR reporting. This might be especially helpful to a bank rebuilding its reputation after a CSR failure. Finally, this investigation using US banks could serve as a precursor for future bank CSR research and help develop CSR reporting guidelines for banks in emerging economies.","PeriodicalId":51401,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the role of analysts in identifying and communicating the value of bank CSR activity\",\"authors\":\"Ruwan Adikaram, Alex Holcomb\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijbm-12-2022-0557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeIn this study, the authors investigate if analysts, as knowledgeable information intermediaries, can correctly identify bank corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities and can reliably transmit that information to investors. Hence, the authors specifically explore if analysts perceive and behave differentially in the presence of genuine bank CSR activities (strengths). The authors also analyze if financial markets differentially assess bank CSR strengths. The authors further explore the viability of focusing on analyst and financial markets to validate genuine bank CSR strengths.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use COMPUSTAT and CRSP for firm and financial data, I/B/E/S for analyst reporting data and MCSI Research KLD for CSR data. The sample consists of 329 distinct banks and 2,525 bank-year observations from 2003 to 2016. The primary CSR score is the total number of CSR strengths less the total number of CSR concerns, across six of the seven dimensions for each firm in each year of the sample (Adjusted CSR Score). In addition, the authors estimate all the analyses with dis-aggregated measures of total CSR strengths and total CSR concerns (Adjusted Total Strength Score).FindingsThe authors find that analysts correctly distinguish and construe bank CSR strengths from CSR concerns. Specifically, bank CSR strengths increase analyst following and forecast accuracy, while decreasing analyst forecast dispersion. The authors further find that bank CSR strengths increase bank market returns. These results are reversed for bank CSR concerns. Additionally, the authors demonstrate that this method using knowledgeable intermediaries can help validate bank CSR strengths.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample is limited to US banks and financial markets. The regulatory and information environment is likely to be different from global or emerging markets. However, since banks in many countries aspire to emulate the US banks, these results would be a precursor of banking sectors conditions in emerging markets. Additionally, the availability of data limits the sample to a period that ends in 2016. To the extent that the importance of ESG and CSR concerns has increased in the intervening time, the results may not accurately reflect the current state of the market.Practical implicationsThis investigation benefits researchers, customers, banking executives, regulators and activist groups. First, the authors show that in addition to customers, analysts and the financial markets appreciate bank CSR strengths. Second, despite sophisticated financial reporting by banks, analysts correctly distinguish and construe bank CSR strengths. Third, the authors demonstrate a method for bank marketing researchers to validate genuine bank CSR activity, as well as provide additional support for customer related bank CSR outcomes. Fourth, the findings highlight the importance for banks to have high-quality CSR reporting. This might be especially helpful to a bank rebuilding its reputation after a CSR failure. Finally, this investigation using US banks could serve as a precursor for future bank CSR research and help develop CSR reporting guidelines for banks in emerging economies.Social implicationsThis investigation benefits researchers, customers, banking executives, regulators and activist groups.Originality/valueThis investigation benefits researchers, customers, banking executives, regulators and activist groups. First, the authors show that in addition to customers, analysts and the financial market appreciates bank CSR strengths. Second, despite sophisticated financial reporting by banks, analysts correctly distinguish and construe bank CSR strengths. Third, the authors demonstrate a method for bank marketing researchers to validate genuine bank CSR activity, as well as provide additional support for customer related bank CSR outcomes. Fourth, the findings highlight the importance for banks to have high-quality CSR reporting. This might be especially helpful to a bank rebuilding its reputation after a CSR failure. Finally, this investigation using US banks could serve as a precursor for future bank CSR research and help develop CSR reporting guidelines for banks in emerging economies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bank Marketing\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bank Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-12-2022-0557\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-12-2022-0557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在本研究中,作者调查了分析师作为知识渊博的信息中介,是否能够正确识别银行的企业社会责任(CSR)活动,并能够可靠地将这些信息传递给投资者。因此,作者特别探讨了分析师在真正的银行社会责任活动(优势)存在时是否会感知和表现不同。作者还分析了金融市场对银行CSR实力的评估是否存在差异。作者进一步探讨了关注分析师和金融市场的可行性,以验证真正的银行社会责任优势。设计/方法/方法作者使用COMPUSTAT和CRSP作为公司和财务数据,I/B/E/S作为分析师报告数据,MCSI Research KLD作为CSR数据。样本包括329家不同的银行和2003年至2016年的2525家银行年度观察结果。企业社会责任的主要得分是企业社会责任优势的总数减去企业社会责任关注的总数,在样本的每一年的7个维度中的6个(调整后的企业社会责任得分)。此外,作者估计所有的分析与社会责任总实力和社会责任总关注(调整总实力得分)的分类措施。作者发现,分析师正确地区分和解释了银行的社会责任优势和社会责任关注。具体而言,银行社会责任优势增加了分析师的跟踪和预测准确性,同时降低了分析师预测的离散度。作者进一步发现,银行社会责任优势增加了银行的市场回报。对于银行的企业社会责任问题,这些结果是相反的。此外,作者证明,这种使用知识中介的方法可以帮助验证银行的社会责任优势。研究局限/启示本样本仅限于美国的银行和金融市场。监管和信息环境可能与全球或新兴市场不同。然而,由于许多国家的银行都渴望效仿美国的银行,这些结果将是新兴市场银行业状况的先兆。此外,数据的可用性将样本限制在2016年结束的时期。在某种程度上,ESG和CSR关注的重要性在这段时间内有所增加,结果可能无法准确反映当前的市场状况。这项调查有利于研究人员、客户、银行高管、监管机构和维权团体。首先,作者表明,除了客户之外,分析师和金融市场也欣赏银行的企业社会责任优势。第二,尽管银行的财务报告很复杂,但分析师正确地区分和解释了银行的社会责任优势。第三,作者为银行营销研究人员展示了一种方法来验证真正的银行社会责任活动,并为与客户相关的银行社会责任结果提供额外的支持。第四,研究结果强调了银行拥有高质量企业社会责任报告的重要性。这可能对银行在企业社会责任失败后重建声誉特别有帮助。最后,这项以美国银行为对象的调查可以作为未来银行社会责任研究的先驱,并有助于为新兴经济体的银行制定社会责任报告指南。这项调查有利于研究人员、客户、银行高管、监管机构和维权团体。这项调查有利于研究人员、客户、银行高管、监管机构和维权团体。首先,作者表明,除了客户之外,分析师和金融市场也欣赏银行的社会责任优势。第二,尽管银行的财务报告很复杂,但分析师正确地区分和解释了银行的社会责任优势。第三,作者为银行营销研究人员展示了一种方法来验证真正的银行社会责任活动,并为与客户相关的银行社会责任结果提供额外的支持。第四,研究结果强调了银行拥有高质量企业社会责任报告的重要性。这可能对银行在企业社会责任失败后重建声誉特别有帮助。最后,这项以美国银行为对象的调查可以作为未来银行社会责任研究的先驱,并有助于为新兴经济体的银行制定社会责任报告指南。
Exploring the role of analysts in identifying and communicating the value of bank CSR activity
PurposeIn this study, the authors investigate if analysts, as knowledgeable information intermediaries, can correctly identify bank corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities and can reliably transmit that information to investors. Hence, the authors specifically explore if analysts perceive and behave differentially in the presence of genuine bank CSR activities (strengths). The authors also analyze if financial markets differentially assess bank CSR strengths. The authors further explore the viability of focusing on analyst and financial markets to validate genuine bank CSR strengths.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use COMPUSTAT and CRSP for firm and financial data, I/B/E/S for analyst reporting data and MCSI Research KLD for CSR data. The sample consists of 329 distinct banks and 2,525 bank-year observations from 2003 to 2016. The primary CSR score is the total number of CSR strengths less the total number of CSR concerns, across six of the seven dimensions for each firm in each year of the sample (Adjusted CSR Score). In addition, the authors estimate all the analyses with dis-aggregated measures of total CSR strengths and total CSR concerns (Adjusted Total Strength Score).FindingsThe authors find that analysts correctly distinguish and construe bank CSR strengths from CSR concerns. Specifically, bank CSR strengths increase analyst following and forecast accuracy, while decreasing analyst forecast dispersion. The authors further find that bank CSR strengths increase bank market returns. These results are reversed for bank CSR concerns. Additionally, the authors demonstrate that this method using knowledgeable intermediaries can help validate bank CSR strengths.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample is limited to US banks and financial markets. The regulatory and information environment is likely to be different from global or emerging markets. However, since banks in many countries aspire to emulate the US banks, these results would be a precursor of banking sectors conditions in emerging markets. Additionally, the availability of data limits the sample to a period that ends in 2016. To the extent that the importance of ESG and CSR concerns has increased in the intervening time, the results may not accurately reflect the current state of the market.Practical implicationsThis investigation benefits researchers, customers, banking executives, regulators and activist groups. First, the authors show that in addition to customers, analysts and the financial markets appreciate bank CSR strengths. Second, despite sophisticated financial reporting by banks, analysts correctly distinguish and construe bank CSR strengths. Third, the authors demonstrate a method for bank marketing researchers to validate genuine bank CSR activity, as well as provide additional support for customer related bank CSR outcomes. Fourth, the findings highlight the importance for banks to have high-quality CSR reporting. This might be especially helpful to a bank rebuilding its reputation after a CSR failure. Finally, this investigation using US banks could serve as a precursor for future bank CSR research and help develop CSR reporting guidelines for banks in emerging economies.Social implicationsThis investigation benefits researchers, customers, banking executives, regulators and activist groups.Originality/valueThis investigation benefits researchers, customers, banking executives, regulators and activist groups. First, the authors show that in addition to customers, analysts and the financial market appreciates bank CSR strengths. Second, despite sophisticated financial reporting by banks, analysts correctly distinguish and construe bank CSR strengths. Third, the authors demonstrate a method for bank marketing researchers to validate genuine bank CSR activity, as well as provide additional support for customer related bank CSR outcomes. Fourth, the findings highlight the importance for banks to have high-quality CSR reporting. This might be especially helpful to a bank rebuilding its reputation after a CSR failure. Finally, this investigation using US banks could serve as a precursor for future bank CSR research and help develop CSR reporting guidelines for banks in emerging economies.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Bank Marketing (IJBM) aims to publish papers that relate to the marketing challenges of financial services providers around the globe.
Preference is given to empirically-based research papers that expand on existing theories (or develop new ones) on customer behaviour in financial services settings.
In addition, the journal is interested in helping academicians and practitioners in the field to better understand the discipline of financial services marketing, and as a result review papers and thought pieces are invited for submission.