印度为何退出区域全面经济伙伴关系协定(RCEP)?印度之谜的重力解释

Q2 Environmental Science Evergreen Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.5109/7148433
None Gour Gobinda Goswami, None Md. Rubaiyath Sarwar, Mostafizur Rahman, None Dulal Chandra Panday, None Ishrat Jahan Ishita, Tahmid Labib, None Nartam Vivekanand Motiram
{"title":"印度为何退出区域全面经济伙伴关系协定(RCEP)?印度之谜的重力解释","authors":"None Gour Gobinda Goswami, None Md. Rubaiyath Sarwar, Mostafizur Rahman, None Dulal Chandra Panday, None Ishrat Jahan Ishita, Tahmid Labib, None Nartam Vivekanand Motiram","doi":"10.5109/7148433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": India’s decision to pull out from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was a surprise to analysts as RCEP is currently the most significant Free Trade Agreement (FTA). This paper examines the rationality of India’s decision. We used gravity set-up and Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimator to analyse India’s export and import data for nine sectors with 45 trading partners for the period 2001-2021. The results show that India’s export is inelastic to tariff while import to India is elastic to tariff. Export remains positive despite tariff on Indian export while import declines with tariff imposed by India. This rationalizes India’s decision to pull out from RCEP. At the sectoral level, tariff elimination reduces India’s export of vegetables, food, minerals and chemicals, plastics and plastics goods. However, tariff elimination increases India’s export of animal and animal food, leather, wood and wood products, textiles and foot ware. Tariff elimination increases import of vegetable, food stuffs, chemicals, plastic and leather to India. The sectoral results show that India has reason to doubt its gain from joining RCEP as the sectoral results are mixed and the overall gain might not be in favour of India.","PeriodicalId":12085,"journal":{"name":"Evergreen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why did India Pull Out of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)? A Gravity Explanation of the Indian Puzzle\",\"authors\":\"None Gour Gobinda Goswami, None Md. Rubaiyath Sarwar, Mostafizur Rahman, None Dulal Chandra Panday, None Ishrat Jahan Ishita, Tahmid Labib, None Nartam Vivekanand Motiram\",\"doi\":\"10.5109/7148433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": India’s decision to pull out from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was a surprise to analysts as RCEP is currently the most significant Free Trade Agreement (FTA). This paper examines the rationality of India’s decision. We used gravity set-up and Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimator to analyse India’s export and import data for nine sectors with 45 trading partners for the period 2001-2021. The results show that India’s export is inelastic to tariff while import to India is elastic to tariff. Export remains positive despite tariff on Indian export while import declines with tariff imposed by India. This rationalizes India’s decision to pull out from RCEP. At the sectoral level, tariff elimination reduces India’s export of vegetables, food, minerals and chemicals, plastics and plastics goods. However, tariff elimination increases India’s export of animal and animal food, leather, wood and wood products, textiles and foot ware. Tariff elimination increases import of vegetable, food stuffs, chemicals, plastic and leather to India. The sectoral results show that India has reason to doubt its gain from joining RCEP as the sectoral results are mixed and the overall gain might not be in favour of India.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evergreen\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evergreen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5109/7148433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evergreen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5109/7148433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why did India Pull Out of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)? A Gravity Explanation of the Indian Puzzle
: India’s decision to pull out from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was a surprise to analysts as RCEP is currently the most significant Free Trade Agreement (FTA). This paper examines the rationality of India’s decision. We used gravity set-up and Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimator to analyse India’s export and import data for nine sectors with 45 trading partners for the period 2001-2021. The results show that India’s export is inelastic to tariff while import to India is elastic to tariff. Export remains positive despite tariff on Indian export while import declines with tariff imposed by India. This rationalizes India’s decision to pull out from RCEP. At the sectoral level, tariff elimination reduces India’s export of vegetables, food, minerals and chemicals, plastics and plastics goods. However, tariff elimination increases India’s export of animal and animal food, leather, wood and wood products, textiles and foot ware. Tariff elimination increases import of vegetable, food stuffs, chemicals, plastic and leather to India. The sectoral results show that India has reason to doubt its gain from joining RCEP as the sectoral results are mixed and the overall gain might not be in favour of India.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evergreen
Evergreen Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: “Evergreen - Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy” is a refereed international open access online journal, serving researchers in academic and research organizations and all practitioners in the science and technology to contribute to the realization of Green Asia where ecology and economic growth coexist. The scope of the journal involves the aspects of science, technology, economic and social science. Namely, Novel Carbon Resource Sciences, Green Asia Strategy, and other fields related to Asian environment should be included in this journal. The journal aims to contribute to resolve or mitigate the global and local problems in Asia by bringing together new ideas and developments. The editors welcome good quality contributions from all over the Asia.
期刊最新文献
Quality of Life and Food Security in Rural Areas of Indonesia: a Case Study of Sedayulawas Village, Lamongan Regency, Indonesia The Effect of Upper and Lower Limit Pressure on the Thermal Performance of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stove Why did India Pull Out of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)? A Gravity Explanation of the Indian Puzzle Using Satellite Data of Palm Oil Area for Potential Utilization in Calculating Palm Oil Trunk Waste as Cofiring Fuel Biomass Economic Feasibility Study of Syngas-Derived Garden Waste Biomass as Liquified Petroleum Gas Substitute in Indonesia: A Case Study for 1-Megawatt Updraft Fixed Bed Gasifier
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1