算法现在就会看到你

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Forum Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1111/socf.12940
Carol A. Heimer
{"title":"算法现在就会看到你","authors":"Carol A. Heimer","doi":"10.1111/socf.12940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, eliminating preventable error has been presented as an audacious, responsible, even noble goal for healthcare organizations. Bosk proposed to show the folly of this aspiration. This essay moves Bosk's work forward by placing ideas about reducing error in the context of other attempts to routinize work, on the one hand, and casting doubt of the viability of such programs, on the other. Other scholars have reshaped our understanding of human behavior by revising key assumptions to make them more psychologically and sociologically realistic. Using Simon's revision of global rationality and Kahneman's revision of expected utility theory as examples, this essay takes a first stab at suggesting which assumptions of the preventable error paradigm need revising. Because we do not fully understand how we gather and process information about each other, this essay argues that we should preserve opportunities for more holistic information gathering, both by ethnographers and medical staff. Importantly, those include occasions when medical workers (not algorithms) encounter, observe, and listen to patients as full human beings (not their digital twins).","PeriodicalId":21904,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Forum","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Algorithm Will See You Now\",\"authors\":\"Carol A. Heimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/socf.12940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For decades, eliminating preventable error has been presented as an audacious, responsible, even noble goal for healthcare organizations. Bosk proposed to show the folly of this aspiration. This essay moves Bosk's work forward by placing ideas about reducing error in the context of other attempts to routinize work, on the one hand, and casting doubt of the viability of such programs, on the other. Other scholars have reshaped our understanding of human behavior by revising key assumptions to make them more psychologically and sociologically realistic. Using Simon's revision of global rationality and Kahneman's revision of expected utility theory as examples, this essay takes a first stab at suggesting which assumptions of the preventable error paradigm need revising. Because we do not fully understand how we gather and process information about each other, this essay argues that we should preserve opportunities for more holistic information gathering, both by ethnographers and medical staff. Importantly, those include occasions when medical workers (not algorithms) encounter, observe, and listen to patients as full human beings (not their digital twins).\",\"PeriodicalId\":21904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Forum\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12940\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

几十年来,消除可预防的错误一直被视为医疗保健组织的一个大胆的、负责任的、甚至是崇高的目标。博斯克打算证明这种愿望是愚蠢的。这篇文章将博斯克的工作向前推进,一方面将减少错误的想法置于其他常规工作尝试的背景下,另一方面对这些程序的可行性提出质疑。其他学者通过修改关键假设,重塑了我们对人类行为的理解,使它们在心理学和社会学上更加现实。本文以西蒙对全球理性的修正和卡尼曼对预期效用理论的修正为例,首次尝试提出可预防错误范式的哪些假设需要修正。因为我们并不完全了解我们如何收集和处理关于彼此的信息,本文认为,我们应该保留更全面的信息收集机会,无论是民族志学家还是医务人员。重要的是,这些情况包括医务工作者(而不是算法)作为完整的人类(而不是他们的数字双胞胎)遇到、观察和倾听患者的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Algorithm Will See You Now
For decades, eliminating preventable error has been presented as an audacious, responsible, even noble goal for healthcare organizations. Bosk proposed to show the folly of this aspiration. This essay moves Bosk's work forward by placing ideas about reducing error in the context of other attempts to routinize work, on the one hand, and casting doubt of the viability of such programs, on the other. Other scholars have reshaped our understanding of human behavior by revising key assumptions to make them more psychologically and sociologically realistic. Using Simon's revision of global rationality and Kahneman's revision of expected utility theory as examples, this essay takes a first stab at suggesting which assumptions of the preventable error paradigm need revising. Because we do not fully understand how we gather and process information about each other, this essay argues that we should preserve opportunities for more holistic information gathering, both by ethnographers and medical staff. Importantly, those include occasions when medical workers (not algorithms) encounter, observe, and listen to patients as full human beings (not their digital twins).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Forum
Sociological Forum SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Sociological Forum is the flagship journal of the Eastern Sociological Society. The journal is peer reviewed and committed to publishing high quality, cutting edge research on substantive issues of fundamental importance to the study of society. The journal"s mission is broad in scope, encompassing empirical works (both quantitative and qualitative in nature), as well as works that develop theories, concepts, and methodological strategies. All areas of sociology and related fields are welcomed in Sociological Forum, as the journal strives to create a site of learning and exchange for scholars and students of the social sciences.
期刊最新文献
Kids in limbo: War, uncertainty, and the school experiences of Ukrainian refugee students in Poland Know your place: Fractured epistemic privilege among women in state organizations Dividing paradise: Rural inequality and the diminishing American dream By JenniferSherman, Oakland, CA: University of California Press. 2021. pp. 288. $29.95 (pbk). ISBN: 9780520305137 Educational inequality as a consequence and cause of race The contribution of intimate partner violence to socioeconomic inequality among Black, Latina, and White women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1