COVID-19大流行对确诊和非确诊精神疾病人群的心理影响水平调查

Serif Nazli, Muhammet Sevindik, Deniz Ozturan, Fatih Vahapoglu
{"title":"COVID-19大流行对确诊和非确诊精神疾病人群的心理影响水平调查","authors":"Serif Nazli, Muhammet Sevindik, Deniz Ozturan, Fatih Vahapoglu","doi":"10.5455/medscience.2023.08.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the anxiety, depression, and psychological impact levels among people with and without psychiatric disease diagnosis in the quarantine and social isolation periods of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This study using the case-control research technique, included 182 cases with psychiatric diagnosis and 183 control participants without a psychiatric diagnosis. The research used the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and a data form inquiring about sociodemographic characteristics. Data were collected from participants during face-to-face psychiatric interviews. The anxiety levels (OR: 6), depression levels (OR: 3.8), and psychological impact levels (OR: 5.8) were identified to be higher in the case group compared to the control group (p<0.05). The HAM-A, HAM-D, and IES-R scores were not affected by age, sex, marital status, education, place of residence, and employment status in the study group. Living alone, receiving treatment, presence of chronic disease, poor income, and COVID (+) relatives affected scores. In this study, those with a psychiatric diagnosis were affected more by the COVID-19 pandemic compared to those without a diagnosis, while among those with a psychiatric diagnosis, those not receiving treatment were more affected than those using treatment.","PeriodicalId":18541,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Science | International Medical Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of psychological impact levels of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with and without psychiatric disease diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Serif Nazli, Muhammet Sevindik, Deniz Ozturan, Fatih Vahapoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/medscience.2023.08.132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to investigate the anxiety, depression, and psychological impact levels among people with and without psychiatric disease diagnosis in the quarantine and social isolation periods of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This study using the case-control research technique, included 182 cases with psychiatric diagnosis and 183 control participants without a psychiatric diagnosis. The research used the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and a data form inquiring about sociodemographic characteristics. Data were collected from participants during face-to-face psychiatric interviews. The anxiety levels (OR: 6), depression levels (OR: 3.8), and psychological impact levels (OR: 5.8) were identified to be higher in the case group compared to the control group (p<0.05). The HAM-A, HAM-D, and IES-R scores were not affected by age, sex, marital status, education, place of residence, and employment status in the study group. Living alone, receiving treatment, presence of chronic disease, poor income, and COVID (+) relatives affected scores. In this study, those with a psychiatric diagnosis were affected more by the COVID-19 pandemic compared to those without a diagnosis, while among those with a psychiatric diagnosis, those not receiving treatment were more affected than those using treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine Science | International Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine Science | International Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2023.08.132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Science | International Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2023.08.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行隔离和社会隔离期间精神疾病患者和非精神疾病患者的焦虑、抑郁和心理影响水平。本研究采用病例对照研究方法,纳入182例有精神病诊断的患者和183例无精神病诊断的对照组。本研究采用汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAM-A)、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)、事件影响评定量表(IES-R)及社会人口学特征问卷。数据是在面对面的精神病学访谈中收集的。病例组的焦虑水平(OR: 6)、抑郁水平(OR: 3.8)和心理影响水平(OR: 5.8)均高于对照组(p < 0.05)。在研究组中,HAM-A、HAM-D和IES-R得分不受年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育程度、居住地和就业状况的影响。独居、接受治疗、存在慢性疾病、收入不佳和COVID(+)亲属影响得分。在这项研究中,与没有被诊断为精神病的人相比,被诊断为精神病的人受COVID-19大流行的影响更大,而在被诊断为精神病的人中,未接受治疗的人比接受治疗的人受影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of psychological impact levels of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with and without psychiatric disease diagnosis
This study aimed to investigate the anxiety, depression, and psychological impact levels among people with and without psychiatric disease diagnosis in the quarantine and social isolation periods of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This study using the case-control research technique, included 182 cases with psychiatric diagnosis and 183 control participants without a psychiatric diagnosis. The research used the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and a data form inquiring about sociodemographic characteristics. Data were collected from participants during face-to-face psychiatric interviews. The anxiety levels (OR: 6), depression levels (OR: 3.8), and psychological impact levels (OR: 5.8) were identified to be higher in the case group compared to the control group (p<0.05). The HAM-A, HAM-D, and IES-R scores were not affected by age, sex, marital status, education, place of residence, and employment status in the study group. Living alone, receiving treatment, presence of chronic disease, poor income, and COVID (+) relatives affected scores. In this study, those with a psychiatric diagnosis were affected more by the COVID-19 pandemic compared to those without a diagnosis, while among those with a psychiatric diagnosis, those not receiving treatment were more affected than those using treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The beneficial effects of ivabradine against myocardial damage induced by isoproterenol in rats Assessment of enteral nutrition through feeding stomas or gastric tubes in digestive surgery What had changed in patient incoming to ear, nose and throat policlinics during COVID-19 Pandemic? The impact of statin therapy in the COVID-19 patients with very high cardiovascular risk Three-dimentional reposition of tibial tubercle and surgical procedure of permanent dislocation of the patella
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1