以第三方为受益人的合同

Serhii Vavzhenchuk
{"title":"以第三方为受益人的合同","authors":"Serhii Vavzhenchuk","doi":"10.17721/1728-2195/2023/1.125-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article, based on scientific doctrine, the legislation of Ukraine and some other countries, examines certain issues related to the problems of legal regulation of a contract in a favour of a third party. A review of the main scientific papers of Ukrainian scientists, who studied the contract in favour of a third party and contractual legal relations arising from the contract in favour of a third party, was carried out. Among scientists, the issue of scientific theory of the moment when third party's right emerges under a contract in favour of a third party remains unresolved. That is the reason the article, on a methodological level, draws specific attention to the main theories of emergence of a third party's right under a contract in favour of a third party. In view of the comprehensive analysis of the norms of the Civil Code of Ukraine, attention is drawn to what theory of the moment of conclusion of a contract in favour of a third party was adopted by the legislator in the Civil Code of Ukraine. In the context of analysis of a contract in favour of third parties, attention is paid to English law, namely the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. It is clarified whether in English contract law, before the adoption of the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act, according to precedent law, the rule called \"privity of contract rule\" was still applied. It is also emphasized that a contract in favour of a third party should be distinguished from a contract of assignment of creditor's right to a third party (singular succession). In the case of singular succession, the previous creditor is 'removed' from the obligation, and in a contract in favour of a third party, such a replacement of the creditor in the obligation does not occur, since the creditor and the third party do not replace each other in the existing obligation, they are not successors of each other and as participants of the contractual relationship exist at the same time without excluding each other. Also, a contract in favour of a third party should be distinguished from a contract under which fulfilment is to be performed to a third person.","PeriodicalId":23484,"journal":{"name":"Vìsnik farmacìï","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONTRACT IN FAVOUR OF A THIRD PARTY\",\"authors\":\"Serhii Vavzhenchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.17721/1728-2195/2023/1.125-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article, based on scientific doctrine, the legislation of Ukraine and some other countries, examines certain issues related to the problems of legal regulation of a contract in a favour of a third party. A review of the main scientific papers of Ukrainian scientists, who studied the contract in favour of a third party and contractual legal relations arising from the contract in favour of a third party, was carried out. Among scientists, the issue of scientific theory of the moment when third party's right emerges under a contract in favour of a third party remains unresolved. That is the reason the article, on a methodological level, draws specific attention to the main theories of emergence of a third party's right under a contract in favour of a third party. In view of the comprehensive analysis of the norms of the Civil Code of Ukraine, attention is drawn to what theory of the moment of conclusion of a contract in favour of a third party was adopted by the legislator in the Civil Code of Ukraine. In the context of analysis of a contract in favour of third parties, attention is paid to English law, namely the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. It is clarified whether in English contract law, before the adoption of the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act, according to precedent law, the rule called \\\"privity of contract rule\\\" was still applied. It is also emphasized that a contract in favour of a third party should be distinguished from a contract of assignment of creditor's right to a third party (singular succession). In the case of singular succession, the previous creditor is 'removed' from the obligation, and in a contract in favour of a third party, such a replacement of the creditor in the obligation does not occur, since the creditor and the third party do not replace each other in the existing obligation, they are not successors of each other and as participants of the contractual relationship exist at the same time without excluding each other. Also, a contract in favour of a third party should be distinguished from a contract under which fulfilment is to be performed to a third person.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vìsnik farmacìï\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vìsnik farmacìï\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2023/1.125-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vìsnik farmacìï","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2023/1.125-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章以科学理论、乌克兰和其他一些国家的立法为基础,审查了与有利于第三方的合同的法律管制问题有关的某些问题。对乌克兰科学家的主要科学论文进行了审查,这些科学家研究了有利于第三方的合同和由有利于第三方的合同产生的合同法律关系。在科学家中,当第三方的权利在有利于第三方的合同下出现时,科学理论的问题仍然没有解决。正因为如此,本文在方法论层面上特别提请注意合同项下出现有利于第三方的第三方权利的主要理论。鉴于对乌克兰民法典规范的全面分析,应注意乌克兰民法典的立法者在订立有利于第三方的合同时采用了何种理论。在分析有利于第三方的合同时,要注意英国法律,即1999年《合同(第三方权利)法》。澄清在英国合同法中,在《合同(第三人权利)法》通过之前,根据判例法,是否仍然适用被称为“合同串通规则”的规则。还强调应将有利于第三方的合同与将债权转让给第三方的合同(单一继承)区分开来。在单一继承的情况下,先前的债权人被从义务中“移除”,而在有利于第三方的合同中,这种债权人在义务中的替代不会发生,因为债权人和第三方在现有义务中并不相互取代,他们不是彼此的继承人,并且作为合同关系的参与者同时存在而不相互排斥。此外,有利于第三方的合同应与向第三方履行的合同区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CONTRACT IN FAVOUR OF A THIRD PARTY
The article, based on scientific doctrine, the legislation of Ukraine and some other countries, examines certain issues related to the problems of legal regulation of a contract in a favour of a third party. A review of the main scientific papers of Ukrainian scientists, who studied the contract in favour of a third party and contractual legal relations arising from the contract in favour of a third party, was carried out. Among scientists, the issue of scientific theory of the moment when third party's right emerges under a contract in favour of a third party remains unresolved. That is the reason the article, on a methodological level, draws specific attention to the main theories of emergence of a third party's right under a contract in favour of a third party. In view of the comprehensive analysis of the norms of the Civil Code of Ukraine, attention is drawn to what theory of the moment of conclusion of a contract in favour of a third party was adopted by the legislator in the Civil Code of Ukraine. In the context of analysis of a contract in favour of third parties, attention is paid to English law, namely the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. It is clarified whether in English contract law, before the adoption of the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act, according to precedent law, the rule called "privity of contract rule" was still applied. It is also emphasized that a contract in favour of a third party should be distinguished from a contract of assignment of creditor's right to a third party (singular succession). In the case of singular succession, the previous creditor is 'removed' from the obligation, and in a contract in favour of a third party, such a replacement of the creditor in the obligation does not occur, since the creditor and the third party do not replace each other in the existing obligation, they are not successors of each other and as participants of the contractual relationship exist at the same time without excluding each other. Also, a contract in favour of a third party should be distinguished from a contract under which fulfilment is to be performed to a third person.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The use of military media to raise the political awareness of Ukrainian military personnel in the system of formal and informal education Methodological principles of conduct of educational classes with cadets of higher army educational institutions and military educational units of institutions of higher education of Ukraine taking into account the experience of the leading countries of the world Application of the polygraph under the conditions of marital state in Ukraine Methodological basis for the development of internal quality assurance system in military higher educational institutions Social-psychological formation mechanisms of the "image of the enemy" from Ukraine by the Russian mass media during the Russian-Ukrainian war
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1