希腊鱼油使用者:关于膳食补充剂使用的预测因素、知识和习惯

IF 3.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES AIMS Public Health Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3934/publichealth.2023058
Panagiotis-David Soukiasian, Zacharenia Kyrana, Konstantina Gerothanasi, Efstratios Kiranas, Lambros E. Kokokiris
{"title":"希腊鱼油使用者:关于膳食补充剂使用的预测因素、知识和习惯","authors":"Panagiotis-David Soukiasian, Zacharenia Kyrana, Konstantina Gerothanasi, Efstratios Kiranas, Lambros E. Kokokiris","doi":"10.3934/publichealth.2023058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<abstract><sec> <title>Background</title> <p>Fish oil (FO) dietary supplements (DS) have gained popularity over the past few decades and emerged as one of the most popular DS in both Europe and the USA. However, in Greece, no study has been carried out to determine the prevalence and characteristics of FO consumers.</p> </sec><sec> <title>Objective</title> <p>The aim of this study was to describe the stance (i.e., beliefs, knowledge and habits) and practices of FO users in Greece towards DS.</p> </sec><sec> <title>Methods</title> <p>A cross-sectional study, using in-person questionnaires and a stratified random sampling technique, was conducted throughout 2018–2019. A total of 28.491 Greek citizens over 15 years old were interviewed in 74 regional units corresponding to the 13 administrative regions of Greece. Having used DS at least once, deemed one as: DS+FO, if FO were among them; DS-FO, if FO were never used or DS non-user, if DS were never used. Pearson's chi-square test was used to determine independence between relevant outcome variables and FO use and multinomial logistic regression was performed to create models predictive of FO use.</p> </sec><sec> <title>Results</title> <p>The sample consisted of 3.5% DS+FO, 51.3% DS-FO and 43.8% DS non-users, while 1.4% could not remember whether they had used DS. Significant predictors for being a DS+FO were identified. DS+FO were more likely to judge a DS-less diet as insufficient, support DS use and comprehend DS's labels. Also, DS+FO had used additional DS, considered more parameters when buying DS and were receivers of DS recommendations from more sources compared to DS-FO. 90% of DS users seek at least one approval source of their DS and 50% support DS recommendation by doctors.</p> </sec><sec> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Favorableness towards DS is more prevalent among DS+FO. Most respondents lack knowledge about the legislative background of DS and many would agree to professional guidance.</p> </sec></abstract>","PeriodicalId":45684,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Public Health","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fish oil users of Greece: Predictors, knowledge and habits regarding dietary supplement use\",\"authors\":\"Panagiotis-David Soukiasian, Zacharenia Kyrana, Konstantina Gerothanasi, Efstratios Kiranas, Lambros E. Kokokiris\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/publichealth.2023058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<abstract><sec> <title>Background</title> <p>Fish oil (FO) dietary supplements (DS) have gained popularity over the past few decades and emerged as one of the most popular DS in both Europe and the USA. However, in Greece, no study has been carried out to determine the prevalence and characteristics of FO consumers.</p> </sec><sec> <title>Objective</title> <p>The aim of this study was to describe the stance (i.e., beliefs, knowledge and habits) and practices of FO users in Greece towards DS.</p> </sec><sec> <title>Methods</title> <p>A cross-sectional study, using in-person questionnaires and a stratified random sampling technique, was conducted throughout 2018–2019. A total of 28.491 Greek citizens over 15 years old were interviewed in 74 regional units corresponding to the 13 administrative regions of Greece. Having used DS at least once, deemed one as: DS+FO, if FO were among them; DS-FO, if FO were never used or DS non-user, if DS were never used. Pearson's chi-square test was used to determine independence between relevant outcome variables and FO use and multinomial logistic regression was performed to create models predictive of FO use.</p> </sec><sec> <title>Results</title> <p>The sample consisted of 3.5% DS+FO, 51.3% DS-FO and 43.8% DS non-users, while 1.4% could not remember whether they had used DS. Significant predictors for being a DS+FO were identified. DS+FO were more likely to judge a DS-less diet as insufficient, support DS use and comprehend DS's labels. Also, DS+FO had used additional DS, considered more parameters when buying DS and were receivers of DS recommendations from more sources compared to DS-FO. 90% of DS users seek at least one approval source of their DS and 50% support DS recommendation by doctors.</p> </sec><sec> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Favorableness towards DS is more prevalent among DS+FO. Most respondents lack knowledge about the legislative background of DS and many would agree to professional guidance.</p> </sec></abstract>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIMS Public Health\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIMS Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

& lt; abstract> & lt; sec>& lt; title> Background< / title>鱼油(FO)膳食补充剂(DS)在过去的几十年里越来越受欢迎,并成为欧洲和美国最受欢迎的膳食补充剂之一。然而,在希腊,没有进行研究来确定FO消费者的患病率和特征。</p>& lt; / sec> & lt; sec>& lt; title> Objective< / title></p>本研究的目的是描述希腊FO用户对DS的立场(即信念、知识和习惯)和做法。</p>& lt; / sec> & lt; sec>& lt; title> Methods< / title>在2018-2019年期间,采用面对面问卷调查和分层随机抽样技术进行了一项横断面研究。共有28.491名15岁以上的希腊公民在对应于希腊13个行政区域的74个区域单位接受了采访。至少使用过一次DS,如有FO,则视为:DS+FO;DS-FO,如果从未使用过,或者DS非用户,如果从未使用过。使用Pearson's卡方检验来确定相关结果变量与FO使用之间的独立性,并使用多项逻辑回归来建立预测FO使用的模型。& lt; / sec> & lt; sec>& lt; title> Results< / title>样本中有3.5%的DS+FO, 51.3%的DS-FO和43.8%的不使用DS,而1.4%的人不记得他们是否使用过DS。确定了成为DS+FO的重要预测因素。DS+FO更有可能认为不含DS的饮食不足,支持DS的使用并理解DS的标签。此外,与DS-FO相比,DS+FO使用了额外的DS,在购买DS时考虑了更多的参数,并且接受了更多来源的DS推荐。90%的DS用户寻求至少一种DS批准来源,50%的用户支持医生的DS建议。& lt; / sec> & lt; sec>& lt; title> Conclusion< / title>对DS的好感在DS+FO中更为普遍。大多数受访者不了解DS的立法背景,许多人同意接受专业指导。</p>& lt; / sec> & lt; / abstract>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fish oil users of Greece: Predictors, knowledge and habits regarding dietary supplement use
Background

Fish oil (FO) dietary supplements (DS) have gained popularity over the past few decades and emerged as one of the most popular DS in both Europe and the USA. However, in Greece, no study has been carried out to determine the prevalence and characteristics of FO consumers.

Objective

The aim of this study was to describe the stance (i.e., beliefs, knowledge and habits) and practices of FO users in Greece towards DS.

Methods

A cross-sectional study, using in-person questionnaires and a stratified random sampling technique, was conducted throughout 2018–2019. A total of 28.491 Greek citizens over 15 years old were interviewed in 74 regional units corresponding to the 13 administrative regions of Greece. Having used DS at least once, deemed one as: DS+FO, if FO were among them; DS-FO, if FO were never used or DS non-user, if DS were never used. Pearson's chi-square test was used to determine independence between relevant outcome variables and FO use and multinomial logistic regression was performed to create models predictive of FO use.

Results

The sample consisted of 3.5% DS+FO, 51.3% DS-FO and 43.8% DS non-users, while 1.4% could not remember whether they had used DS. Significant predictors for being a DS+FO were identified. DS+FO were more likely to judge a DS-less diet as insufficient, support DS use and comprehend DS's labels. Also, DS+FO had used additional DS, considered more parameters when buying DS and were receivers of DS recommendations from more sources compared to DS-FO. 90% of DS users seek at least one approval source of their DS and 50% support DS recommendation by doctors.

Conclusion

Favorableness towards DS is more prevalent among DS+FO. Most respondents lack knowledge about the legislative background of DS and many would agree to professional guidance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Public Health
AIMS Public Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the urban climate crisis: Exploring the nexus of urbanization, climate change, and their impacts on the environment and human well-being - A global perspective. Assessing mental resilience with individual and lifestyle determinants among nursing students: An observational study from Greece. Peer (dyadic) support: a hypertension feasibility study for older African American women. Can hotels be used as alternative care sites in disasters and public health emergencies-A narrative review. Safeguarding nurses' mental health: The critical role of psychosocial safety climate in mitigating relational stressors and exhaustion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1