{"title":"北非:气候紧急情况和家庭农业","authors":"Max Ajl, Habib Ayeb, Ray Bush","doi":"10.1080/03056244.2023.2267311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article examines recent international financial institution and national government policy in North Africa intended to address the climate emergency. It focuses on the role of the World Bank and general policy trends since the 1970s. These policy trends fail to understand the continuing centrality of small-scale family farming to social reproduction and food production. The article stresses the significance of historical patterns of underdevelopment, and the uneven incorporation of North Africa into global capitalism. An understanding of the longue durée is crucial in understanding why, and how, agrarian transformations have taken the form that they have, and why national sovereign projects and popular struggles offer an alternative strategy to counter imperialism and neo-colonialism. International financial institutions’ preoccupation with policies of mitigation and adaptation to climate change fails to address how poverty is generated and reproduced.RÉSUMÉCet article examine les récentes politiques des institutions financières internationales et des gouvernements nationaux en Afrique du Nord visant à répondre à l’urgence climatique. Il se concentre sur le rôle de la Banque mondiale et sur les tendances politiques depuis les années 1970. Il s’agit d’une politique qui ne comprend pas le rôle central que continue de jouer l’agriculture familiale à petite échelle dans la reproduction sociale et la production alimentaire. L’article souligne l’importance des tendances historiques de sous-développement et l’intégration inégale de l’Afrique du Nord dans le capitalisme mondial. Une compréhension de la longue durée est cruciale pour comprendre pourquoi et comment les transformations agraires ont pris la forme qu’elles ont prise et pourquoi les projets souverains nationaux et les luttes populaires offrent une stratégie alternative pour contrer l’impérialisme et le néocolonialisme. La préoccupation des institutions financières internationales pour les politiques d’atténuation et d’adaptation au changement climatique ne tient pas compte de la manière dont la pauvreté est générée et reproduite.KEYWORDS: Political ecologyclimateagrarian questionsmall-scale farmersWorld BankNorth AfricaMOTS-CLÉS: Écologie politiqueclimatquestion agraireagriculteurs à petite échelleBanque MondialeAfrique du Nord AcknowledgementsThe work in this article was made possible with support from the Supporting Pastoralism and Agriculture in Recurrent and Protracted Crisis (SPARC) Programme funded by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) of the United Kingdom. The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the FCDO. Thanks to Dhouha Djerbi and Aymen Amayed for their help with research and data collection.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 We find the methodology of Watts (Citation2013) useful here in taking climate change as an opportunity to bring the entire structure of the society under scrutiny.2 The following account draws from Ajl (Citation2021).3 The Bandung conference in Indonesia on 18–24 April 1955 was a meeting of 29 Asian and African governments that debated, among other things, the importance of political self-determination, sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs of especially the newly independent decolonised states.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMax AjlMax Ajl is a Senior Fellow in the Department of Conflict and Development Studies, University of Ghent, and an editor at Agrarian South and Journal of Labor and Society. He has written for the Journal of Peasant Studies, Globalizations, Review of African Political Economy and Middle East Report. He researches climate politics, Tunisian national liberation, agrarian politics in the Arab region, and Arab intellectual history. He is the author of A people’s green new deal (2021).Habib AyebHabib Ayeb is a geographer and Professor Emeritus at Paris 8 University in Saint-Denis, France. His current research focuses on agrarian, food, ecological and climate issues. He is co-founder of the Observatoire de la Souveraineté Alimentaire et de l’Environnement (OSAE) in Tunisia. He is also a film-maker and is currently directing a documentary on climate change and its impact on the environment.Ray BushRay Bush is Professor Emeritus at the University of Leeds. He has published widely on the political economy of Africa and the Near East and is an editor of Review of African Political Economy.","PeriodicalId":47526,"journal":{"name":"Review of African Political Economy","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"North Africa: the climate emergency and family farming\",\"authors\":\"Max Ajl, Habib Ayeb, Ray Bush\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03056244.2023.2267311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis article examines recent international financial institution and national government policy in North Africa intended to address the climate emergency. It focuses on the role of the World Bank and general policy trends since the 1970s. These policy trends fail to understand the continuing centrality of small-scale family farming to social reproduction and food production. The article stresses the significance of historical patterns of underdevelopment, and the uneven incorporation of North Africa into global capitalism. An understanding of the longue durée is crucial in understanding why, and how, agrarian transformations have taken the form that they have, and why national sovereign projects and popular struggles offer an alternative strategy to counter imperialism and neo-colonialism. International financial institutions’ preoccupation with policies of mitigation and adaptation to climate change fails to address how poverty is generated and reproduced.RÉSUMÉCet article examine les récentes politiques des institutions financières internationales et des gouvernements nationaux en Afrique du Nord visant à répondre à l’urgence climatique. Il se concentre sur le rôle de la Banque mondiale et sur les tendances politiques depuis les années 1970. Il s’agit d’une politique qui ne comprend pas le rôle central que continue de jouer l’agriculture familiale à petite échelle dans la reproduction sociale et la production alimentaire. L’article souligne l’importance des tendances historiques de sous-développement et l’intégration inégale de l’Afrique du Nord dans le capitalisme mondial. Une compréhension de la longue durée est cruciale pour comprendre pourquoi et comment les transformations agraires ont pris la forme qu’elles ont prise et pourquoi les projets souverains nationaux et les luttes populaires offrent une stratégie alternative pour contrer l’impérialisme et le néocolonialisme. La préoccupation des institutions financières internationales pour les politiques d’atténuation et d’adaptation au changement climatique ne tient pas compte de la manière dont la pauvreté est générée et reproduite.KEYWORDS: Political ecologyclimateagrarian questionsmall-scale farmersWorld BankNorth AfricaMOTS-CLÉS: Écologie politiqueclimatquestion agraireagriculteurs à petite échelleBanque MondialeAfrique du Nord AcknowledgementsThe work in this article was made possible with support from the Supporting Pastoralism and Agriculture in Recurrent and Protracted Crisis (SPARC) Programme funded by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) of the United Kingdom. The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the FCDO. Thanks to Dhouha Djerbi and Aymen Amayed for their help with research and data collection.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 We find the methodology of Watts (Citation2013) useful here in taking climate change as an opportunity to bring the entire structure of the society under scrutiny.2 The following account draws from Ajl (Citation2021).3 The Bandung conference in Indonesia on 18–24 April 1955 was a meeting of 29 Asian and African governments that debated, among other things, the importance of political self-determination, sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs of especially the newly independent decolonised states.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMax AjlMax Ajl is a Senior Fellow in the Department of Conflict and Development Studies, University of Ghent, and an editor at Agrarian South and Journal of Labor and Society. He has written for the Journal of Peasant Studies, Globalizations, Review of African Political Economy and Middle East Report. He researches climate politics, Tunisian national liberation, agrarian politics in the Arab region, and Arab intellectual history. He is the author of A people’s green new deal (2021).Habib AyebHabib Ayeb is a geographer and Professor Emeritus at Paris 8 University in Saint-Denis, France. His current research focuses on agrarian, food, ecological and climate issues. He is co-founder of the Observatoire de la Souveraineté Alimentaire et de l’Environnement (OSAE) in Tunisia. He is also a film-maker and is currently directing a documentary on climate change and its impact on the environment.Ray BushRay Bush is Professor Emeritus at the University of Leeds. He has published widely on the political economy of Africa and the Near East and is an editor of Review of African Political Economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of African Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of African Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2023.2267311\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of African Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2023.2267311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文考察了最近国际金融机构和国家政府在北非旨在应对气候紧急情况的政策。它侧重于世界银行的作用和1970年代以来的一般政策趋势。这些政策趋势未能理解小规模家庭农业对社会再生产和粮食生产的持续中心地位。这篇文章强调了历史上不发达的模式的重要性,以及北非不平衡地融入全球资本主义。理解长期的经济转型对于理解土地转型为什么以及如何采取他们所拥有的形式,以及为什么国家主权项目和人民斗争提供了反帝国主义和新殖民主义的另一种战略是至关重要的。国际金融机构对减缓和适应气候变化政策的关注未能解决贫困的产生和再生产问题。RÉSUMÉCet文章考察了非洲北部地区的政治、机构、金融、国际、政府和国家的经济状况,以及非洲北部地区的经济状况。1970年,世界银行和政治事务委员会将集中于此rôle。我们将继续在我们的家庭农业、小型农业和社会再生产以及食品生产方面开展工作。第1章:“重要的是,在未来的时间里,我们将与其他的人一起,在未来的时间里,我们将与其他的人一起,在未来的时间里,我们将与其他的人一起,在未来的时间里,我们将与其他的人一起,在未来的时间里。”有一种办法,即在综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合、综合。La关注金融机构份倒les政治'attenuation et d 'adaptation盟换向机构的避暑不tient帐户de La方式不拉pauvrete est generee reproduite。关键词:政治生态气候农业问题小农世界银行北方AfricaMOTS-CLÉS: Écologie政治气候问题农业农民小型的农业小型的农业小型的农业)黎巴嫩世界感谢本文的工作得到了由英国外交、联邦和发展部(FCDO)资助的“在经常性和长期危机中支持畜牧和农业(SPARC)计划”的支持。内容是作者的责任,并不一定反映FCDO的意见。感谢Dhouha Djerbi和Aymen Amayed在研究和数据收集方面的帮助。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1:我们发现Watts (Citation2013)的方法在将气候变化作为审视整个社会结构的机会方面很有用下面的叙述摘自aj1 (Citation2021)1955年4月18日至24日在印度尼西亚举行的万隆会议是29个亚洲和非洲国家政府的一次会议,除其他事项外,会议讨论了政治自决、主权和不干涉内政的重要性,特别是新独立的非殖民化国家。作者简介max Ajl是根特大学冲突与发展研究系的高级研究员,也是《南方农业》和《劳动与社会杂志》的编辑。他曾为《农民研究杂志》、《全球化》、《非洲政治经济评论》和《中东报告》撰稿。他的研究领域包括气候政治、突尼斯民族解放、阿拉伯地区的农业政治和阿拉伯思想史。他是《人民的绿色新政》(2021)的作者。Habib Ayeb是法国圣德尼巴黎第八大学的地理学家和名誉教授。他目前的研究重点是农业、食品、生态和气候问题。他是突尼斯souverainet、Alimentaire和de l ' environment天文台(OSAE)的联合创始人。他还是一名电影制作人,目前正在执导一部关于气候变化及其对环境影响的纪录片。Ray Bush是利兹大学的名誉教授。他在非洲和近东的政治经济学方面发表了大量文章,是《非洲政治经济学评论》的编辑。
North Africa: the climate emergency and family farming
ABSTRACTThis article examines recent international financial institution and national government policy in North Africa intended to address the climate emergency. It focuses on the role of the World Bank and general policy trends since the 1970s. These policy trends fail to understand the continuing centrality of small-scale family farming to social reproduction and food production. The article stresses the significance of historical patterns of underdevelopment, and the uneven incorporation of North Africa into global capitalism. An understanding of the longue durée is crucial in understanding why, and how, agrarian transformations have taken the form that they have, and why national sovereign projects and popular struggles offer an alternative strategy to counter imperialism and neo-colonialism. International financial institutions’ preoccupation with policies of mitigation and adaptation to climate change fails to address how poverty is generated and reproduced.RÉSUMÉCet article examine les récentes politiques des institutions financières internationales et des gouvernements nationaux en Afrique du Nord visant à répondre à l’urgence climatique. Il se concentre sur le rôle de la Banque mondiale et sur les tendances politiques depuis les années 1970. Il s’agit d’une politique qui ne comprend pas le rôle central que continue de jouer l’agriculture familiale à petite échelle dans la reproduction sociale et la production alimentaire. L’article souligne l’importance des tendances historiques de sous-développement et l’intégration inégale de l’Afrique du Nord dans le capitalisme mondial. Une compréhension de la longue durée est cruciale pour comprendre pourquoi et comment les transformations agraires ont pris la forme qu’elles ont prise et pourquoi les projets souverains nationaux et les luttes populaires offrent une stratégie alternative pour contrer l’impérialisme et le néocolonialisme. La préoccupation des institutions financières internationales pour les politiques d’atténuation et d’adaptation au changement climatique ne tient pas compte de la manière dont la pauvreté est générée et reproduite.KEYWORDS: Political ecologyclimateagrarian questionsmall-scale farmersWorld BankNorth AfricaMOTS-CLÉS: Écologie politiqueclimatquestion agraireagriculteurs à petite échelleBanque MondialeAfrique du Nord AcknowledgementsThe work in this article was made possible with support from the Supporting Pastoralism and Agriculture in Recurrent and Protracted Crisis (SPARC) Programme funded by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) of the United Kingdom. The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the FCDO. Thanks to Dhouha Djerbi and Aymen Amayed for their help with research and data collection.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 We find the methodology of Watts (Citation2013) useful here in taking climate change as an opportunity to bring the entire structure of the society under scrutiny.2 The following account draws from Ajl (Citation2021).3 The Bandung conference in Indonesia on 18–24 April 1955 was a meeting of 29 Asian and African governments that debated, among other things, the importance of political self-determination, sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs of especially the newly independent decolonised states.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMax AjlMax Ajl is a Senior Fellow in the Department of Conflict and Development Studies, University of Ghent, and an editor at Agrarian South and Journal of Labor and Society. He has written for the Journal of Peasant Studies, Globalizations, Review of African Political Economy and Middle East Report. He researches climate politics, Tunisian national liberation, agrarian politics in the Arab region, and Arab intellectual history. He is the author of A people’s green new deal (2021).Habib AyebHabib Ayeb is a geographer and Professor Emeritus at Paris 8 University in Saint-Denis, France. His current research focuses on agrarian, food, ecological and climate issues. He is co-founder of the Observatoire de la Souveraineté Alimentaire et de l’Environnement (OSAE) in Tunisia. He is also a film-maker and is currently directing a documentary on climate change and its impact on the environment.Ray BushRay Bush is Professor Emeritus at the University of Leeds. He has published widely on the political economy of Africa and the Near East and is an editor of Review of African Political Economy.
期刊介绍:
The Review of African Political Economy (ROAPE) is a refereed journal committed to encouraging high quality research and fostering excellence in the understanding of African political economy. Published quarterly by Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group for the ROAPE international collective it has since 1974 provided radical analysis of trends and issues in Africa. It has paid particular attention to the political economy of inequality, exploitation and oppression, whether driven by global forces or local ones (such as class, race, community and gender), and to materialist interpretations of change in Africa. It has sustained a critical analysis of the nature of power and the state in Africa.