编制面向教师候选人的技术价值取向感知量表

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Media International Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/09523987.2023.2262193
Mehmet Selim Yıldırım, Tuğba Yanpar Yelken, Hatice Sancar Tokmak
{"title":"编制面向教师候选人的技术价值取向感知量表","authors":"Mehmet Selim Yıldırım, Tuğba Yanpar Yelken, Hatice Sancar Tokmak","doi":"10.1080/09523987.2023.2262193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to measure teacher candidates’ perception of technological value orientations. Design/Methodology/ It was conducted based on data from 400 teacher candidates for explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and 680 teacher candidates for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in the 2018–2019 academic year. Expert opinions were sought for the content validity and face validity of the scale as well as the EFA and CFA were conducted for construct validity. EFA yielded a three-factor solution consisting of 12 items that accounted for 53.17% of total variance. These factors were labeled as “Negative Impact on Friendship, Honesty, and Responsibility”, “Negative Impact on Overall Values”, and “Positive Impact on Access to Information and Benevolence“. Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.75. Besides, findings from the CFA indicated that Technological Value Orientation Perception Scale of Teacher Candidates is of adequate fit with 12 items under a three-factor construct. In addition, the convergent and discriminant validity results also supported the three-factor structure. This scale could of help researchers to measure the perception of prospective teachers about the impact of technology on value-orientations and to plan desired studies accordingly.KEYWORDS: Values educationtechnologyteacher candidatesvalidity and reliability Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":46439,"journal":{"name":"Educational Media International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a technological value-orientation perception scale for teacher candidates\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Selim Yıldırım, Tuğba Yanpar Yelken, Hatice Sancar Tokmak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09523987.2023.2262193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to measure teacher candidates’ perception of technological value orientations. Design/Methodology/ It was conducted based on data from 400 teacher candidates for explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and 680 teacher candidates for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in the 2018–2019 academic year. Expert opinions were sought for the content validity and face validity of the scale as well as the EFA and CFA were conducted for construct validity. EFA yielded a three-factor solution consisting of 12 items that accounted for 53.17% of total variance. These factors were labeled as “Negative Impact on Friendship, Honesty, and Responsibility”, “Negative Impact on Overall Values”, and “Positive Impact on Access to Information and Benevolence“. Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.75. Besides, findings from the CFA indicated that Technological Value Orientation Perception Scale of Teacher Candidates is of adequate fit with 12 items under a three-factor construct. In addition, the convergent and discriminant validity results also supported the three-factor structure. This scale could of help researchers to measure the perception of prospective teachers about the impact of technology on value-orientations and to plan desired studies accordingly.KEYWORDS: Values educationtechnologyteacher candidatesvalidity and reliability Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Media International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Media International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2023.2262193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Media International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2023.2262193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在建立一个有效、可靠的测量工具来测量教师候选人对技术价值取向的感知。设计/方法/本研究基于2018-2019学年400名解释性因子分析(EFA)教师候选人和680名验证性因子分析(CFA)教师候选人的数据。对量表的内容效度和面效度征询专家意见,对量表的构念效度进行EFA和CFA测试。EFA产生了一个由12个项目组成的三因素解决方案,占总方差的53.17%。这些因素被标记为“对友谊、诚实和责任的负面影响”,“对整体价值观的负面影响”和“对获取信息和仁爱的积极影响”。量表的Cronbach 's Alpha内部一致性系数为0.75。此外,CFA的研究结果表明,在三因素结构下,教师候选人的技术价值取向感知量表有12个项目具有足够的拟合性。此外,收敛效度和判别效度结果也支持三因素结构。该量表可以帮助研究人员衡量未来教师对技术对价值取向影响的看法,并据此计划所需的研究。关键词:价值观教育技术教师候选人效度和信度披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing a technological value-orientation perception scale for teacher candidates
ABSTRACTThe aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to measure teacher candidates’ perception of technological value orientations. Design/Methodology/ It was conducted based on data from 400 teacher candidates for explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and 680 teacher candidates for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in the 2018–2019 academic year. Expert opinions were sought for the content validity and face validity of the scale as well as the EFA and CFA were conducted for construct validity. EFA yielded a three-factor solution consisting of 12 items that accounted for 53.17% of total variance. These factors were labeled as “Negative Impact on Friendship, Honesty, and Responsibility”, “Negative Impact on Overall Values”, and “Positive Impact on Access to Information and Benevolence“. Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.75. Besides, findings from the CFA indicated that Technological Value Orientation Perception Scale of Teacher Candidates is of adequate fit with 12 items under a three-factor construct. In addition, the convergent and discriminant validity results also supported the three-factor structure. This scale could of help researchers to measure the perception of prospective teachers about the impact of technology on value-orientations and to plan desired studies accordingly.KEYWORDS: Values educationtechnologyteacher candidatesvalidity and reliability Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Media International
Educational Media International EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
The impact of technostress on caregivers of primary and secondary school children during distance-learning throughout the COVID-19 pandemic Do class WhatsApp groups undermine perceived teacher authority? Perspectives of female students in religious high schools Transforming science education with virtual reality: an immersive representations model Elementary student experiences from digital safety immersion summer program Unveiling the underlying constructs of mobile assisted language learning technological pedagogical content knowledge (MALL TPACK): development and validation of a MALL TPACK scale for EFL teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1