“你的应该更像我的!”在非正式的工程设计活动中,竞争是什么样的?

ChangChia Liu, Dorothy Bennett
{"title":"“你的应该更像我的!”在非正式的工程设计活动中,竞争是什么样的?","authors":"ChangChia Liu, Dorothy Bennett","doi":"10.1080/24758779.2023.12318605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractExplore competitive learning environments, children's competitive behaviors, and the influence of these behaviors on engaging children and families in engineering learning.Keywords: Informal EducationEngineeringInclusionScienceEngineering PracticesSTEM ConclusionThe purpose of this study is to explore the role that goal orientation can play in better understanding and conceptualizing children’s and their families' engagement with engineering design activities in informal learning environments. Our aim is to depict the diverse ways in which children engage with engineering design processes and practices and to highlight potential factors that may influence their experiences. The results indicate the complexity of children’s goal orientations and potential contextual factors that may influence their goal orientations and yield new insights for future researchers and educators to better support children and their families to engage with engineering in informal learning environments.Notes1. Some motivation researchers also conceptualized a mastery-avoidance goal orientation, suggesting a two-by-two matrix of goal orientations, namely performance-approach, performance-avoidance, mastery-approach, and mastery-avoidance. However, studies also indicated that the mastery-avoidance goal orientation may not be conceptually valid or empirically supported, especially for young children (for more information, please see comprehensive reviews by Kaplan and Maehr 2007, and CitationVandewalle et al. 2019). In addition, our prior study (CitationLiu and Bennett 2022) also showed that young children may not separate performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations, and instead, had a general concept of performance goal orientation. In this study, we categorized children’s goal orientations into two simplified categories: performance and mastery goal orientation.Additional informationNotes on contributorsChangChia LiuChangChia Liu is a Senior Research Associate and Dorothy Bennett is the Director of Creative Pedagogy, both at the New York Hall of Science in Flushing, New York.Dorothy BennettChangChia Liu is a Senior Research Associate and Dorothy Bennett is the Director of Creative Pedagogy, both at the New York Hall of Science in Flushing, New York.","PeriodicalId":72694,"journal":{"name":"Connected science learning","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Yours need to be more like mine!” What does competition look like in informal engineering design activities?\",\"authors\":\"ChangChia Liu, Dorothy Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24758779.2023.12318605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractExplore competitive learning environments, children's competitive behaviors, and the influence of these behaviors on engaging children and families in engineering learning.Keywords: Informal EducationEngineeringInclusionScienceEngineering PracticesSTEM ConclusionThe purpose of this study is to explore the role that goal orientation can play in better understanding and conceptualizing children’s and their families' engagement with engineering design activities in informal learning environments. Our aim is to depict the diverse ways in which children engage with engineering design processes and practices and to highlight potential factors that may influence their experiences. The results indicate the complexity of children’s goal orientations and potential contextual factors that may influence their goal orientations and yield new insights for future researchers and educators to better support children and their families to engage with engineering in informal learning environments.Notes1. Some motivation researchers also conceptualized a mastery-avoidance goal orientation, suggesting a two-by-two matrix of goal orientations, namely performance-approach, performance-avoidance, mastery-approach, and mastery-avoidance. However, studies also indicated that the mastery-avoidance goal orientation may not be conceptually valid or empirically supported, especially for young children (for more information, please see comprehensive reviews by Kaplan and Maehr 2007, and CitationVandewalle et al. 2019). In addition, our prior study (CitationLiu and Bennett 2022) also showed that young children may not separate performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations, and instead, had a general concept of performance goal orientation. In this study, we categorized children’s goal orientations into two simplified categories: performance and mastery goal orientation.Additional informationNotes on contributorsChangChia LiuChangChia Liu is a Senior Research Associate and Dorothy Bennett is the Director of Creative Pedagogy, both at the New York Hall of Science in Flushing, New York.Dorothy BennettChangChia Liu is a Senior Research Associate and Dorothy Bennett is the Director of Creative Pedagogy, both at the New York Hall of Science in Flushing, New York.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Connected science learning\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Connected science learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24758779.2023.12318605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connected science learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24758779.2023.12318605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要探讨竞争性学习环境、儿童竞争性行为以及这些行为对儿童和家庭参与工程学习的影响。关键词:非正式教育工程包容科学工程实践stem结论本研究的目的是探讨目标导向在更好地理解和概念化儿童及其家庭在非正式学习环境中参与工程设计活动中的作用。我们的目标是描绘儿童参与工程设计过程和实践的各种方式,并强调可能影响他们体验的潜在因素。研究结果表明,儿童目标取向的复杂性和可能影响其目标取向的潜在背景因素,为未来的研究人员和教育工作者更好地支持儿童及其家庭在非正式学习环境中参与工程学习提供了新的见解。一些动机研究者还将掌握-回避目标取向概念化,提出了一个2乘2的目标取向矩阵,即绩效-趋近、绩效-回避、掌握-趋近和掌握-回避。然而,研究也表明,掌握-回避目标取向可能在概念上不有效,也没有经验支持,特别是对于幼儿(欲了解更多信息,请参阅Kaplan和Maehr 2007年的综合综述,以及CitationVandewalle等人2019年的综述)。此外,我们之前的研究(CitationLiu和Bennett 2022)也表明,幼儿可能不会区分绩效接近和绩效回避目标取向,而是对绩效目标取向有一个大致的概念。在本研究中,我们将儿童的目标取向简化为两类:表现目标取向和掌握目标取向。作者简介刘昌佳(changchia Liu)是位于纽约法拉盛的纽约科学馆的高级研究助理,多萝西·班尼特(Dorothy Bennett)是创意教育学主任。Dorothy Bennett刘长嘉是纽约法拉盛纽约科学馆的高级研究助理,Dorothy Bennett是创意教育学主任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Yours need to be more like mine!” What does competition look like in informal engineering design activities?
AbstractExplore competitive learning environments, children's competitive behaviors, and the influence of these behaviors on engaging children and families in engineering learning.Keywords: Informal EducationEngineeringInclusionScienceEngineering PracticesSTEM ConclusionThe purpose of this study is to explore the role that goal orientation can play in better understanding and conceptualizing children’s and their families' engagement with engineering design activities in informal learning environments. Our aim is to depict the diverse ways in which children engage with engineering design processes and practices and to highlight potential factors that may influence their experiences. The results indicate the complexity of children’s goal orientations and potential contextual factors that may influence their goal orientations and yield new insights for future researchers and educators to better support children and their families to engage with engineering in informal learning environments.Notes1. Some motivation researchers also conceptualized a mastery-avoidance goal orientation, suggesting a two-by-two matrix of goal orientations, namely performance-approach, performance-avoidance, mastery-approach, and mastery-avoidance. However, studies also indicated that the mastery-avoidance goal orientation may not be conceptually valid or empirically supported, especially for young children (for more information, please see comprehensive reviews by Kaplan and Maehr 2007, and CitationVandewalle et al. 2019). In addition, our prior study (CitationLiu and Bennett 2022) also showed that young children may not separate performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations, and instead, had a general concept of performance goal orientation. In this study, we categorized children’s goal orientations into two simplified categories: performance and mastery goal orientation.Additional informationNotes on contributorsChangChia LiuChangChia Liu is a Senior Research Associate and Dorothy Bennett is the Director of Creative Pedagogy, both at the New York Hall of Science in Flushing, New York.Dorothy BennettChangChia Liu is a Senior Research Associate and Dorothy Bennett is the Director of Creative Pedagogy, both at the New York Hall of Science in Flushing, New York.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing Electric Cars: A University-Based Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration with Elementary Schools Co-Designing Space Science Curricula for and with Neurodivergent Learners Supporting All Learners Multilingual Word Walls: An Entry Point to Translanguaging Engaging Neurodiverse Youth in Informal STEM Learning: Strategies and Recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1