德国铀计划的特殊性(1939-1945)

IF 0.5 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.3390/jne4030040
Manfred Popp, Piet de Klerk
{"title":"德国铀计划的特殊性(1939-1945)","authors":"Manfred Popp, Piet de Klerk","doi":"10.3390/jne4030040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An analysis of the peculiarities of the German Uranium Project (1939–1945) reveals that it was, in many ways, different from what one would expect. There was no work at all on a possible bomb, nor on plutonium. The reactor experiments were limited to subcritical systems and did not attempt to achieve the proclaimed goal of a self-sustaining chain reaction. The so-far identified deficits (lack of interest in Nazi circles, mismanagement, scientific mistakes, and deteriorating work conditions during the war) are relevant but not sufficient for explaining the peculiarities. We deduce that the scientists involved, and even the Heereswaffenamt (army ordnance), shied away from making progress, not only towards a bomb but even towards a reactor. They did not fail; they rather renounced a possible success in order not to provoke political interest in the development of a bomb.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Peculiarities of the German Uranium Project (1939–1945)\",\"authors\":\"Manfred Popp, Piet de Klerk\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jne4030040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An analysis of the peculiarities of the German Uranium Project (1939–1945) reveals that it was, in many ways, different from what one would expect. There was no work at all on a possible bomb, nor on plutonium. The reactor experiments were limited to subcritical systems and did not attempt to achieve the proclaimed goal of a self-sustaining chain reaction. The so-far identified deficits (lack of interest in Nazi circles, mismanagement, scientific mistakes, and deteriorating work conditions during the war) are relevant but not sufficient for explaining the peculiarities. We deduce that the scientists involved, and even the Heereswaffenamt (army ordnance), shied away from making progress, not only towards a bomb but even towards a reactor. They did not fail; they rather renounced a possible success in order not to provoke political interest in the development of a bomb.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jne4030040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jne4030040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对德国铀计划(1939-1945)特点的分析表明,它在许多方面与人们所期望的不同。根本就没有制造核弹的工作,也没有钚的工作。反应堆实验仅限于亚临界系统,并没有试图达到自持链式反应的目标。迄今为止发现的缺陷(对纳粹圈子缺乏兴趣,管理不善,科学错误,战争期间工作条件恶化)是相关的,但不足以解释这些特点。我们推断,参与其中的科学家们,甚至是陆军军械部队(Heereswaffenamt),都在回避取得进展,不仅是在制造炸弹方面,甚至在反应堆方面。他们没有失败;他们宁可放弃可能取得的成功,以免引起政治上对研制原子弹的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Peculiarities of the German Uranium Project (1939–1945)
An analysis of the peculiarities of the German Uranium Project (1939–1945) reveals that it was, in many ways, different from what one would expect. There was no work at all on a possible bomb, nor on plutonium. The reactor experiments were limited to subcritical systems and did not attempt to achieve the proclaimed goal of a self-sustaining chain reaction. The so-far identified deficits (lack of interest in Nazi circles, mismanagement, scientific mistakes, and deteriorating work conditions during the war) are relevant but not sufficient for explaining the peculiarities. We deduce that the scientists involved, and even the Heereswaffenamt (army ordnance), shied away from making progress, not only towards a bomb but even towards a reactor. They did not fail; they rather renounced a possible success in order not to provoke political interest in the development of a bomb.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.
期刊最新文献
Verification and Geometry Optimization of a One Fluid Molten Salt Reactor (OFMSR) with Fixed Volume The Transfer of Xenon-135 to Molten Salt Reactor Graphite Molten Salt Pump Journal-Bearings Dynamic Characteristics Under Hydrodynamic Lubrication Conditions Technical Brief: Safeguardability Analysis of a Molten Salt Sampling System Design An Improved Heat Flux Partitioning Model of Nucleate Boiling Under Saturated Pool Boiling Condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1