利用裂缝特征函数和机器学习模型识别页岩气藏天然裂缝

Atif Ismail , Farshid Torabi , Saman Azadbakht , Qamar Yasin
{"title":"利用裂缝特征函数和机器学习模型识别页岩气藏天然裂缝","authors":"Atif Ismail ,&nbsp;Farshid Torabi ,&nbsp;Saman Azadbakht ,&nbsp;Qamar Yasin","doi":"10.1016/j.uncres.2023.100069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Identifying fractures is important for optimizing recovery and enhancing oil recovery techniques. Identifying natural fractures using FMI and cores is expensive and unavailable for all wells. Therefore, predictive models based on conventional wireline logs are necessary. Extreme Gradient Boosting, Decision tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Feed Forward Neural Network, and Recurrent Neural Network were applied to identify natural fractures. This study uses well logs to develop a new Fracture Signature Function equation for determining natural fractures in the shale reservoir. This unsupervised approach requires no special image log to identify natural fractures. However, the class imbalance problem between the fracture and non-fractured zone often restricts the accuracy of the machine learning models, which require a predictive model not dependent upon the special logs and class imbalance problems in the prediction of fractured zones. Synthetic Minority Oversampling (SMOTE) and Random Oversampling (ROS) were applied to solve the class imbalance problem in the data. The results show that the machine learning models did not predict the fracture and non-fracture zones with acceptable accuracy even after applying SMOTE and ROS. Relative to all machine learning models, Random Forest predicted the results with the highest accuracy of 91 % and F1-Score of 17.6 %. The Fracture Signature Function (FSFn'') predicted the natural fractures with high accuracy except in zones with very complex borehole environments. A Forward Neural Network is more efficient in identifying fracture and non-fractured zones in imbalance class problems of the dataset. The Recurrent Neural Network's predictions were biased toward the major class related to the non-fractured zone of the studied interval. The newly developed equation can be used for natural fracture identification in drilling and production strategy design by using the easily available well-log data in class imbalanced conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101263,"journal":{"name":"Unconventional Resources","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100069"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666519023000481/pdfft?md5=f4c8df06c5a7f285727503103734bcb3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666519023000481-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of natural fractures in shale gas reservoirs using fracture signature function and machine learning models\",\"authors\":\"Atif Ismail ,&nbsp;Farshid Torabi ,&nbsp;Saman Azadbakht ,&nbsp;Qamar Yasin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.uncres.2023.100069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Identifying fractures is important for optimizing recovery and enhancing oil recovery techniques. Identifying natural fractures using FMI and cores is expensive and unavailable for all wells. Therefore, predictive models based on conventional wireline logs are necessary. Extreme Gradient Boosting, Decision tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Feed Forward Neural Network, and Recurrent Neural Network were applied to identify natural fractures. This study uses well logs to develop a new Fracture Signature Function equation for determining natural fractures in the shale reservoir. This unsupervised approach requires no special image log to identify natural fractures. However, the class imbalance problem between the fracture and non-fractured zone often restricts the accuracy of the machine learning models, which require a predictive model not dependent upon the special logs and class imbalance problems in the prediction of fractured zones. Synthetic Minority Oversampling (SMOTE) and Random Oversampling (ROS) were applied to solve the class imbalance problem in the data. The results show that the machine learning models did not predict the fracture and non-fracture zones with acceptable accuracy even after applying SMOTE and ROS. Relative to all machine learning models, Random Forest predicted the results with the highest accuracy of 91 % and F1-Score of 17.6 %. The Fracture Signature Function (FSFn'') predicted the natural fractures with high accuracy except in zones with very complex borehole environments. A Forward Neural Network is more efficient in identifying fracture and non-fractured zones in imbalance class problems of the dataset. The Recurrent Neural Network's predictions were biased toward the major class related to the non-fractured zone of the studied interval. The newly developed equation can be used for natural fracture identification in drilling and production strategy design by using the easily available well-log data in class imbalanced conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unconventional Resources\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666519023000481/pdfft?md5=f4c8df06c5a7f285727503103734bcb3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666519023000481-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unconventional Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666519023000481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unconventional Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666519023000481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

裂缝识别对于优化采收率和提高采收率技术具有重要意义。利用FMI和岩心识别天然裂缝是昂贵的,而且并非所有井都适用。因此,基于常规电缆测井的预测模型是必要的。应用极端梯度增强、决策树、随机森林、支持向量机、前馈神经网络和递归神经网络识别天然裂缝。该研究利用测井资料建立了一种新的裂缝特征函数方程,用于确定页岩储层中的天然裂缝。这种无监督的方法不需要特殊的图像测井来识别天然裂缝。然而,裂缝区与非裂缝区之间的类不平衡问题往往限制了机器学习模型的准确性,这就需要一个不依赖于特殊测井曲线的预测模型和裂缝区预测中的类不平衡问题。采用合成少数派过采样(SMOTE)和随机过采样(ROS)来解决数据中的类不平衡问题。结果表明,即使应用了SMOTE和ROS,机器学习模型也不能以可接受的精度预测裂缝和非裂缝区域。相对于所有机器学习模型,Random Forest预测结果的准确率最高,为91%,F1-Score为17.6%。裂缝特征函数(FSFn)除了在井眼环境非常复杂的区域外,对天然裂缝的预测精度很高。在数据集的不平衡类问题中,前向神经网络能够更有效地识别裂缝和非裂缝区域。递归神经网络的预测偏向于研究层段中与非压裂区相关的主要类别。新建立的方程可以利用易获得的类不平衡条件下的测井资料,用于钻井和生产策略设计中的天然裂缝识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identification of natural fractures in shale gas reservoirs using fracture signature function and machine learning models

Identifying fractures is important for optimizing recovery and enhancing oil recovery techniques. Identifying natural fractures using FMI and cores is expensive and unavailable for all wells. Therefore, predictive models based on conventional wireline logs are necessary. Extreme Gradient Boosting, Decision tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Feed Forward Neural Network, and Recurrent Neural Network were applied to identify natural fractures. This study uses well logs to develop a new Fracture Signature Function equation for determining natural fractures in the shale reservoir. This unsupervised approach requires no special image log to identify natural fractures. However, the class imbalance problem between the fracture and non-fractured zone often restricts the accuracy of the machine learning models, which require a predictive model not dependent upon the special logs and class imbalance problems in the prediction of fractured zones. Synthetic Minority Oversampling (SMOTE) and Random Oversampling (ROS) were applied to solve the class imbalance problem in the data. The results show that the machine learning models did not predict the fracture and non-fracture zones with acceptable accuracy even after applying SMOTE and ROS. Relative to all machine learning models, Random Forest predicted the results with the highest accuracy of 91 % and F1-Score of 17.6 %. The Fracture Signature Function (FSFn'') predicted the natural fractures with high accuracy except in zones with very complex borehole environments. A Forward Neural Network is more efficient in identifying fracture and non-fractured zones in imbalance class problems of the dataset. The Recurrent Neural Network's predictions were biased toward the major class related to the non-fractured zone of the studied interval. The newly developed equation can be used for natural fracture identification in drilling and production strategy design by using the easily available well-log data in class imbalanced conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing climate strategies of major energy corporations and examining projections in relation to Paris Agreement objectives within the framework of sustainable energy Reservoir evaluation method based on explainable machine learning with small samples Thermodynamic analysis for definition of low-potential heat sources The influence of pore throat heterogeneity and fractal characteristics on reservoir quality: A case study of chang 8 member tight sandstones, Ordos Basin Transitioning to sustainable economic resilience through renewable energy and green hydrogen: The case of Iraq
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1