为减少海水入侵而优化泵送和注入方案

IF 12.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Resources Environment and Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100140
Assaad Kassem , Kassem El Cheikh Ali , Ahmed Sefelnasr , Mohsen Sherif
{"title":"为减少海水入侵而优化泵送和注入方案","authors":"Assaad Kassem ,&nbsp;Kassem El Cheikh Ali ,&nbsp;Ahmed Sefelnasr ,&nbsp;Mohsen Sherif","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seawater intrusion (SWI) stands as a significant challenge impacting coastal aquifers worldwide. The emergence of SWI is a natural phenomenon owing to the density difference between seawater and freshwater. Even without any pumping, the seawater naturally advances inland until a hydrostatic equilibrium between the two water sources is reached. However, human interventions, such as excessive groundwater extraction, coastal developments, and land use as well as climate change intensify the SWI predicament. Efficient solutions to counteract the SWI problem involve the implementation of hydraulic barriers. By employing the Henry problem as a benchmark, the Finite Element Simulator (FEFLOW), which is a numerical modeling software, was used for simulating the flow and transport processes. An integrated FEFLOW-Python code was developed to optimize hydraulic barriers for mitigating SWI. The methodology aims to achieve the maximum possible reduction in SWI by iteratively adjusting the locations and rates of pumping and injection wells. Unlike other investigations, this study explores the utilization of negative SWI barriers to extract brackish water from the dispersion zone and potentially offer a cost-effective alternative water source for desalination plants’ intakes. For the Henry Problem, to maximize the reduction in of SWI, brackish water extraction wells should be situated near the center-bottom of the intrusion zone, with a pumping rate of 2.5 m<sup>3</sup>/day. For injection wells, the optimal location varies depending on the injection rate (I). Achieving the highest retardation (61%) occurs when the injection rate is 1 m<sup>3</sup>/day, positioned at the aquifer’s bottom and close to the coastal boundary. However, for injection rates below 0.7 m<sup>3</sup>/day, the injection well’s optimal location shifts towards the seawater intrusion toe. This study presents a novel approach by establishing explicit correlations for optimizing hydraulic barriers to effectively manage and mitigate SWI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100140"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000336/pdfft?md5=772b1fbdf0f26a6459765e72b7178f4b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666916123000336-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of pumping and injection regimes for mitigation of seawater intrusion\",\"authors\":\"Assaad Kassem ,&nbsp;Kassem El Cheikh Ali ,&nbsp;Ahmed Sefelnasr ,&nbsp;Mohsen Sherif\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Seawater intrusion (SWI) stands as a significant challenge impacting coastal aquifers worldwide. The emergence of SWI is a natural phenomenon owing to the density difference between seawater and freshwater. Even without any pumping, the seawater naturally advances inland until a hydrostatic equilibrium between the two water sources is reached. However, human interventions, such as excessive groundwater extraction, coastal developments, and land use as well as climate change intensify the SWI predicament. Efficient solutions to counteract the SWI problem involve the implementation of hydraulic barriers. By employing the Henry problem as a benchmark, the Finite Element Simulator (FEFLOW), which is a numerical modeling software, was used for simulating the flow and transport processes. An integrated FEFLOW-Python code was developed to optimize hydraulic barriers for mitigating SWI. The methodology aims to achieve the maximum possible reduction in SWI by iteratively adjusting the locations and rates of pumping and injection wells. Unlike other investigations, this study explores the utilization of negative SWI barriers to extract brackish water from the dispersion zone and potentially offer a cost-effective alternative water source for desalination plants’ intakes. For the Henry Problem, to maximize the reduction in of SWI, brackish water extraction wells should be situated near the center-bottom of the intrusion zone, with a pumping rate of 2.5 m<sup>3</sup>/day. For injection wells, the optimal location varies depending on the injection rate (I). Achieving the highest retardation (61%) occurs when the injection rate is 1 m<sup>3</sup>/day, positioned at the aquifer’s bottom and close to the coastal boundary. However, for injection rates below 0.7 m<sup>3</sup>/day, the injection well’s optimal location shifts towards the seawater intrusion toe. This study presents a novel approach by establishing explicit correlations for optimizing hydraulic barriers to effectively manage and mitigate SWI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000336/pdfft?md5=772b1fbdf0f26a6459765e72b7178f4b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666916123000336-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海水入侵(SWI)是影响全球沿海含水层的重大挑战。SWI的出现是由于海水和淡水之间的密度差异造成的自然现象。即使没有任何泵送,海水也会自然地向内陆移动,直到两个水源之间达到流体静力学平衡。然而,过度抽取地下水、沿海开发、土地利用以及气候变化等人为干预加剧了SWI的困境。解决SWI问题的有效方法包括实施水力屏障。以Henry问题为基准,利用数值模拟软件Finite Element Simulator (FEFLOW)对流动和输运过程进行模拟。开发了一个集成的FEFLOW-Python代码来优化水力屏障以减轻SWI。该方法旨在通过迭代调整泵注井的位置和速率,最大限度地降低SWI。与其他研究不同的是,本研究探索了利用负SWI屏障从分散区提取微咸水,并可能为海水淡化厂的进水口提供一种具有成本效益的替代水源。对于Henry问题,为了最大限度地降低SWI,苦咸水抽取井应位于侵入区的中底附近,泵送量为2.5 m3/d。注水井的最佳位置取决于注入速度(I)。当注入速度为1 m3/天时,位于含水层底部,靠近海岸边界,达到最高的延迟(61%)。然而,当注入速率低于0.7 m3/天时,注入井的最佳位置转向海水侵入趾。注水井位置的选择与注入速率密切相关,最大阻滞率可能达到61%。该研究提出了一种新的方法,通过建立显式相关性来优化水力屏障,从而有效地管理和减轻SWI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimization of pumping and injection regimes for mitigation of seawater intrusion

Seawater intrusion (SWI) stands as a significant challenge impacting coastal aquifers worldwide. The emergence of SWI is a natural phenomenon owing to the density difference between seawater and freshwater. Even without any pumping, the seawater naturally advances inland until a hydrostatic equilibrium between the two water sources is reached. However, human interventions, such as excessive groundwater extraction, coastal developments, and land use as well as climate change intensify the SWI predicament. Efficient solutions to counteract the SWI problem involve the implementation of hydraulic barriers. By employing the Henry problem as a benchmark, the Finite Element Simulator (FEFLOW), which is a numerical modeling software, was used for simulating the flow and transport processes. An integrated FEFLOW-Python code was developed to optimize hydraulic barriers for mitigating SWI. The methodology aims to achieve the maximum possible reduction in SWI by iteratively adjusting the locations and rates of pumping and injection wells. Unlike other investigations, this study explores the utilization of negative SWI barriers to extract brackish water from the dispersion zone and potentially offer a cost-effective alternative water source for desalination plants’ intakes. For the Henry Problem, to maximize the reduction in of SWI, brackish water extraction wells should be situated near the center-bottom of the intrusion zone, with a pumping rate of 2.5 m3/day. For injection wells, the optimal location varies depending on the injection rate (I). Achieving the highest retardation (61%) occurs when the injection rate is 1 m3/day, positioned at the aquifer’s bottom and close to the coastal boundary. However, for injection rates below 0.7 m3/day, the injection well’s optimal location shifts towards the seawater intrusion toe. This study presents a novel approach by establishing explicit correlations for optimizing hydraulic barriers to effectively manage and mitigate SWI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Effects of asymmetric policies to achieve emissions reduction on energy trade: A North American perspective An efficient strategy to promote food waste composting by adding black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae during the compost maturation phase Household energy use and barriers in clean transition in the Tibetan Plateau Enhancing the performance of runoff prediction in data-scarce hydrological domains using advanced transfer learning Unveiling driving disparities between satisfaction and equity of ecosystem services in urbanized areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1