助推器活动能提高领导力培训的有效性吗?使用混合方法设计比较教练和电子邮件

Susanne Tafvelin, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, Andreas Stenling
{"title":"助推器活动能提高领导力培训的有效性吗?使用混合方法设计比较教练和电子邮件","authors":"Susanne Tafvelin, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, Andreas Stenling","doi":"10.16993/sjwop.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the widespread use of new information technology, calls have been made for leadership training research to examine if the effects of leadership training can be boosted over time by sending text messages or e-mails, in order to reinforce the lessons learned in training interventions. Based on media synchronicity theory (MST), the purpose of the current study was to contrast the usefulness of two booster activities: traditional telephone coaching, and exercises sent by e-mail. Managers were randomly assigned to one of the two booster conditions. We then used a mixed methods design including both quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate the boosters. We obtained the quantitative data from 20 managers and their 323 employees at four time points: before, during, and after the training. We also used focus group interviews to evaluate managers’ experience of both booster activities. The quantitative analyses indicated statistically significant differences between the two groups after the second session, where managers in the e-mail group scored higher on readiness for change and perceived applicability of the training. The latent growth curve analyses indicated a statistically significant increase in employees’ perception of managers’ autonomy support. The qualitative data suggest that the e-mail booster was considered informative and flexible but also time consuming, while the telephone coaching was perceived as flexible but somewhat unstructured. Our findings suggest that an e-mail booster could be a cost-effective alternative to reinforce lessons learned in leadership training.","PeriodicalId":31182,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Booster Activities Improve the Effectiveness of Leadership Training? Comparing Coaching to E-mails Using a Mixed Methods Design\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Tafvelin, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, Andreas Stenling\",\"doi\":\"10.16993/sjwop.184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the widespread use of new information technology, calls have been made for leadership training research to examine if the effects of leadership training can be boosted over time by sending text messages or e-mails, in order to reinforce the lessons learned in training interventions. Based on media synchronicity theory (MST), the purpose of the current study was to contrast the usefulness of two booster activities: traditional telephone coaching, and exercises sent by e-mail. Managers were randomly assigned to one of the two booster conditions. We then used a mixed methods design including both quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate the boosters. We obtained the quantitative data from 20 managers and their 323 employees at four time points: before, during, and after the training. We also used focus group interviews to evaluate managers’ experience of both booster activities. The quantitative analyses indicated statistically significant differences between the two groups after the second session, where managers in the e-mail group scored higher on readiness for change and perceived applicability of the training. The latent growth curve analyses indicated a statistically significant increase in employees’ perception of managers’ autonomy support. The qualitative data suggest that the e-mail booster was considered informative and flexible but also time consuming, while the telephone coaching was perceived as flexible but somewhat unstructured. Our findings suggest that an e-mail booster could be a cost-effective alternative to reinforce lessons learned in leadership training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着新信息技术的广泛使用,人们呼吁进行领导力培训研究,以检验是否可以通过发送短信或电子邮件来提高领导力培训的效果,以加强在培训干预中吸取的经验教训。基于媒介同步性理论(MST),本研究的目的是对比两种促进活动的有效性:传统的电话辅导和通过电子邮件发送的练习。管理人员被随机分配到两种助推器中的一种。然后,我们使用混合方法设计,包括定量和定性数据来评估助推器。我们在培训前、培训中、培训后四个时间点获得了20位管理者及其323名员工的定量数据。我们还使用焦点小组访谈来评估管理者的能力;两种助推器活动的经验。定量分析表明,在第二次培训后,两组之间存在统计学上的显著差异,其中电子邮件组的经理在培训的变革准备程度和感知的适用性方面得分更高。潜在增长曲线分析表明,员工人数有统计学意义上的显著增加;管理者的认知;自治的支持。定性数据表明,电子邮件助推器被认为信息量大、灵活,但也很耗时,而电话辅导被认为灵活,但有些非结构化。我们的研究结果表明,电子邮件助推器可能是一种具有成本效益的替代方案,可以强化在领导力培训中所学到的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can Booster Activities Improve the Effectiveness of Leadership Training? Comparing Coaching to E-mails Using a Mixed Methods Design
With the widespread use of new information technology, calls have been made for leadership training research to examine if the effects of leadership training can be boosted over time by sending text messages or e-mails, in order to reinforce the lessons learned in training interventions. Based on media synchronicity theory (MST), the purpose of the current study was to contrast the usefulness of two booster activities: traditional telephone coaching, and exercises sent by e-mail. Managers were randomly assigned to one of the two booster conditions. We then used a mixed methods design including both quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate the boosters. We obtained the quantitative data from 20 managers and their 323 employees at four time points: before, during, and after the training. We also used focus group interviews to evaluate managers’ experience of both booster activities. The quantitative analyses indicated statistically significant differences between the two groups after the second session, where managers in the e-mail group scored higher on readiness for change and perceived applicability of the training. The latent growth curve analyses indicated a statistically significant increase in employees’ perception of managers’ autonomy support. The qualitative data suggest that the e-mail booster was considered informative and flexible but also time consuming, while the telephone coaching was perceived as flexible but somewhat unstructured. Our findings suggest that an e-mail booster could be a cost-effective alternative to reinforce lessons learned in leadership training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology Psychology-Psychology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Measuring Trust in Public Sector Organizations – Research Note When a Crisis Hits, Send in the Psychologists? A Latent Transition Analysis of Help-Seeking Behavior Among Swedish Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic Collective Versus Individual Influence at Work Procedural Autonomy, Individual Arrangements, and Intention to Leave Work in the Eldercare Sector Collective Versus Individual Influence at Work Procedural Autonomy, Individual Arrangements, and Intention to Leave Work in the Eldercare Sector Applicants’ Faith in Recruiters’ Intuition Predicts Process Favorability for the Unstructured Employment Interview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1