二甲醚燃料农用拖拉机发动机循环燃烧变异性研究

Avinash Kumar Agarwal, Hardikk Valera, Vikram Kumar, Nalini Kanta Mukherjee, Shanti Mehra, Devendra Nene
{"title":"二甲醚燃料农用拖拉机发动机循环燃烧变异性研究","authors":"Avinash Kumar Agarwal, Hardikk Valera, Vikram Kumar, Nalini Kanta Mukherjee, Shanti Mehra, Devendra Nene","doi":"10.1115/1.4063201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Combustion in dimethyl-ether (DME)-fueled engines needs to be assessed carefully for its widespread acceptability from a drivability viewpoint. Since the test engine used in an off-highway segment, it was tested in a steady-state cycle for engine performance, combustion, emissions, and their cyclic variations, which were the only parameters to assess the drivability. This study investigated and analyzed the cyclic variations of a 100% DME-fueled engine equipped with modified mechanical fuel injection equipment. It was compared with baseline diesel to understand its positive and negative aspects. Experiments were conducted at different engine speeds (1200,1600, and 2000 rpm) and loads (No Load, 1.29, 2.59, 3.88, 5.18, and 6.47 bar brake mean effective pressure (BMEP)) . In-cylinder pressure was recorded for 250 consecutive engine cycles, and many combustion parameters were comparatively analyzed for diesel and DME fuelings. The coefficient of variation (COV) of maximum in-cylinder pressure (Pmax) was lower for DME than diesel at 1600 rpm and comparable at the other remaining engine speeds (1200 and 2000 rpm). Variations in COV of Pmax were higher at low loads and negligible at high loads for both test fuels. At 2000 rpm, the crank angle positions at which Pmax occurred were distributed in a narrow range for DME, representing higher combustion stability than baseline diesel. Variations in the maximum rate of pressure rise (RoPRmax) were lower for DME at 3.88 and 6.47 bar BMEP, while these were higher at 1.29 bar BMEP than baseline diesel. COV of indicated mean effective pressure (COVIMEP) decreased from lower to higher loads for diesel and DME fueling at 1600 and 2000 rpm engine speeds. The differences in COVIMEP between diesel and DME were negligible at higher loads, representing engine stability similar to baseline diesel. Combustion parameters assessed indicated that DME fueling led to lower cyclic variations than baseline diesel as the engine operated from lower to higher loads. At lower loads, DME fueling showed higher cyclic variations than baseline diesel.","PeriodicalId":8652,"journal":{"name":"ASME Open Journal of Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyclic Combustion Variability of Dimethyl-Ether-Fueled Agricultural Tractor Engine\",\"authors\":\"Avinash Kumar Agarwal, Hardikk Valera, Vikram Kumar, Nalini Kanta Mukherjee, Shanti Mehra, Devendra Nene\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Combustion in dimethyl-ether (DME)-fueled engines needs to be assessed carefully for its widespread acceptability from a drivability viewpoint. Since the test engine used in an off-highway segment, it was tested in a steady-state cycle for engine performance, combustion, emissions, and their cyclic variations, which were the only parameters to assess the drivability. This study investigated and analyzed the cyclic variations of a 100% DME-fueled engine equipped with modified mechanical fuel injection equipment. It was compared with baseline diesel to understand its positive and negative aspects. Experiments were conducted at different engine speeds (1200,1600, and 2000 rpm) and loads (No Load, 1.29, 2.59, 3.88, 5.18, and 6.47 bar brake mean effective pressure (BMEP)) . In-cylinder pressure was recorded for 250 consecutive engine cycles, and many combustion parameters were comparatively analyzed for diesel and DME fuelings. The coefficient of variation (COV) of maximum in-cylinder pressure (Pmax) was lower for DME than diesel at 1600 rpm and comparable at the other remaining engine speeds (1200 and 2000 rpm). Variations in COV of Pmax were higher at low loads and negligible at high loads for both test fuels. At 2000 rpm, the crank angle positions at which Pmax occurred were distributed in a narrow range for DME, representing higher combustion stability than baseline diesel. Variations in the maximum rate of pressure rise (RoPRmax) were lower for DME at 3.88 and 6.47 bar BMEP, while these were higher at 1.29 bar BMEP than baseline diesel. COV of indicated mean effective pressure (COVIMEP) decreased from lower to higher loads for diesel and DME fueling at 1600 and 2000 rpm engine speeds. The differences in COVIMEP between diesel and DME were negligible at higher loads, representing engine stability similar to baseline diesel. Combustion parameters assessed indicated that DME fueling led to lower cyclic variations than baseline diesel as the engine operated from lower to higher loads. At lower loads, DME fueling showed higher cyclic variations than baseline diesel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASME Open Journal of Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASME Open Journal of Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME Open Journal of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要二甲醚(DME)燃料发动机的燃烧需要从驾驶性能的角度对其广泛的可接受性进行仔细的评估。由于测试发动机用于非公路路段,因此在稳态循环中测试了发动机性能,燃烧,排放及其循环变化,这些是评估驾驶性能的唯一参数。本文研究并分析了安装改进的机械燃油喷射装置的100%二甲醚燃料发动机的循环变化。将其与基线柴油进行比较,以了解其积极和消极方面。在不同发动机转速(1200、1600和2000 rpm)和负载(空载、1.29、2.59、3.88、5.18和6.47 bar制动平均有效压力(BMEP))下进行了实验。记录了250个连续发动机循环的缸内压力,并对柴油和二甲醚燃料的许多燃烧参数进行了比较分析。DME发动机最大缸内压力(Pmax)的变异系数(COV)在1600 rpm时低于柴油发动机,在其他发动机转速(1200和2000 rpm)下也相当。两种试验燃料的Pmax COV在低负荷时变化较大,在高负荷时变化可以忽略不计。在2000 rpm时,DME出现Pmax的曲柄角位置分布在一个较窄的范围内,表现出比基线柴油更高的燃烧稳定性。DME在3.88和6.47 bar BMEP时最大压力上升率(RoPRmax)的变化较低,而在1.29 bar BMEP时,这些变化高于基线柴油。在1600转/分和2000转/分的发动机转速下,柴油和二甲醚加油时,指示平均有效压力(COVIMEP)的COV从低负荷到高负荷下降。在更高的负载下,柴油和二甲醚的COVIMEP差异可以忽略不计,这表明发动机的稳定性与基线柴油相似。燃烧参数评估表明,当发动机从低负荷到高负荷运行时,DME燃料比基线柴油的循环变化更小。在较低负荷下,DME加注比基线柴油表现出更高的循环变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cyclic Combustion Variability of Dimethyl-Ether-Fueled Agricultural Tractor Engine
Abstract Combustion in dimethyl-ether (DME)-fueled engines needs to be assessed carefully for its widespread acceptability from a drivability viewpoint. Since the test engine used in an off-highway segment, it was tested in a steady-state cycle for engine performance, combustion, emissions, and their cyclic variations, which were the only parameters to assess the drivability. This study investigated and analyzed the cyclic variations of a 100% DME-fueled engine equipped with modified mechanical fuel injection equipment. It was compared with baseline diesel to understand its positive and negative aspects. Experiments were conducted at different engine speeds (1200,1600, and 2000 rpm) and loads (No Load, 1.29, 2.59, 3.88, 5.18, and 6.47 bar brake mean effective pressure (BMEP)) . In-cylinder pressure was recorded for 250 consecutive engine cycles, and many combustion parameters were comparatively analyzed for diesel and DME fuelings. The coefficient of variation (COV) of maximum in-cylinder pressure (Pmax) was lower for DME than diesel at 1600 rpm and comparable at the other remaining engine speeds (1200 and 2000 rpm). Variations in COV of Pmax were higher at low loads and negligible at high loads for both test fuels. At 2000 rpm, the crank angle positions at which Pmax occurred were distributed in a narrow range for DME, representing higher combustion stability than baseline diesel. Variations in the maximum rate of pressure rise (RoPRmax) were lower for DME at 3.88 and 6.47 bar BMEP, while these were higher at 1.29 bar BMEP than baseline diesel. COV of indicated mean effective pressure (COVIMEP) decreased from lower to higher loads for diesel and DME fueling at 1600 and 2000 rpm engine speeds. The differences in COVIMEP between diesel and DME were negligible at higher loads, representing engine stability similar to baseline diesel. Combustion parameters assessed indicated that DME fueling led to lower cyclic variations than baseline diesel as the engine operated from lower to higher loads. At lower loads, DME fueling showed higher cyclic variations than baseline diesel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current Trends and Innovations in Enhancing the Aerodynamic Performance of Small-Scale, Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines: A Review Effect of Filament Color and Fused Deposition Modeling/Fused Filament Fabrication Process on the Development of Bistability in Switchable Bistable Squares Thermodynamic Analysis of Comprehensive Performance of Carbon Dioxide(R744) and Its Mixture With Ethane(R170) Used in Refrigeration and Heating System at Low Evaporation Temperature Current Status and Emerging Techniques for Measuring the Dielectric Properties of Biological Tissues Replacing All Fossil Fuels With Nuclear-Enabled Hydrogen, Cellulosic Hydrocarbon Biofuels, and Dispatchable Electricity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1