在“贫民窟”社区重建权威:基本收入促进权利的必要性

IF 0.5 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Open Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1515/culture-2022-0190
Matthew Thomas Johnson
{"title":"在“贫民窟”社区重建权威:基本收入促进权利的必要性","authors":"Matthew Thomas Johnson","doi":"10.1515/culture-2022-0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents an immanent critique of neoliberal welfare reform using observation of participatory research involving left-behind communities in the North East of England and Australia. It argues that harms, such as passivity, invoked to reduce social security and increase conditionality are actually enhanced by austerity, conditionality and philanthropic giving. Deploying Mauss’ conception of the gift suggests that aggressive, conditional giving, combined with consumption through indebtedness, has served to strip individuals of authority. This leads to a radical conclusion: the stated aims of policy platforms like Big Society can only be realized through statutory entitlements like basic income.","PeriodicalId":41385,"journal":{"name":"Open Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rebuilding Authority in “Lumpen” Communities: The Need for Basic Income to Foster Entitlement\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Thomas Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/culture-2022-0190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article presents an immanent critique of neoliberal welfare reform using observation of participatory research involving left-behind communities in the North East of England and Australia. It argues that harms, such as passivity, invoked to reduce social security and increase conditionality are actually enhanced by austerity, conditionality and philanthropic giving. Deploying Mauss’ conception of the gift suggests that aggressive, conditional giving, combined with consumption through indebtedness, has served to strip individuals of authority. This leads to a radical conclusion: the stated aims of policy platforms like Big Society can only be realized through statutory entitlements like basic income.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2022-0190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2022-0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文通过对英格兰东北部和澳大利亚留守社区参与性研究的观察,提出了对新自由主义福利改革的内在批判。它认为,为了减少社会保障和增加条件限制而援引的被动等危害,实际上会因紧缩、条件限制和慈善捐赠而加剧。采用莫斯的礼物概念表明,激进的、有条件的捐赠,加上通过负债进行的消费,已经剥夺了个人的权威。这导致了一个激进的结论:像“大社会”这样的政策平台的既定目标只能通过基本收入等法定权利来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rebuilding Authority in “Lumpen” Communities: The Need for Basic Income to Foster Entitlement
Abstract This article presents an immanent critique of neoliberal welfare reform using observation of participatory research involving left-behind communities in the North East of England and Australia. It argues that harms, such as passivity, invoked to reduce social security and increase conditionality are actually enhanced by austerity, conditionality and philanthropic giving. Deploying Mauss’ conception of the gift suggests that aggressive, conditional giving, combined with consumption through indebtedness, has served to strip individuals of authority. This leads to a radical conclusion: the stated aims of policy platforms like Big Society can only be realized through statutory entitlements like basic income.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Cultural Studies
Open Cultural Studies CULTURAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum to “‘Thrice the brindled cat hath mew’d’ – The Three Trials of William Hone” Data that Should Not Have Been Given: Noise and Immunity in James Newitt’s HAVEN Tracing Exilience Through Literature and Translation: A Portuguese Gargantua in Paris (1848) Montana as Place of (Un)Belonging: Landscape, Identity, and the American West in Bella Vista (2014) A Syphilis-Giving God? On the Interpretation of the Philistine’s Scourge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1