妇女在国际商务谈判中的地位呈消极趋势

Q4 Social Sciences Human Research in Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.21554/hrr.092304
Suada A. Dzogovic, Anita Cucovic
{"title":"妇女在国际商务谈判中的地位呈消极趋势","authors":"Suada A. Dzogovic, Anita Cucovic","doi":"10.21554/hrr.092304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decade, many studies have been conducted on the ethical aspects of gender equality in international business negotiations. Research shows that, despite women’s success in solving global negotiation challenges, their participation is still limited. And while this influence may not be direct, it should be noted that women are generally considered less good negotiators than their male counterparts. In this sense, through analyzing theoretical discourse, this article examines the contemporary practice of business negotiation. The goal is to point out the (un)ethical continuity of the gender division of labor, whereby gender should not prejudge the individual, but rather his negotiation abilities. As the existing scientific literature requires further multidisciplinary research, we believe this article will contribute to a better understanding of the importance of ethical harmony of gender equality as the best strategy and practice for negotiating parties in international business negotiations.","PeriodicalId":32121,"journal":{"name":"Human Research in Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEGATIVE TREND IN THE POSITIONING OF WOMEN IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS NEGOTIATIONS\",\"authors\":\"Suada A. Dzogovic, Anita Cucovic\",\"doi\":\"10.21554/hrr.092304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past decade, many studies have been conducted on the ethical aspects of gender equality in international business negotiations. Research shows that, despite women’s success in solving global negotiation challenges, their participation is still limited. And while this influence may not be direct, it should be noted that women are generally considered less good negotiators than their male counterparts. In this sense, through analyzing theoretical discourse, this article examines the contemporary practice of business negotiation. The goal is to point out the (un)ethical continuity of the gender division of labor, whereby gender should not prejudge the individual, but rather his negotiation abilities. As the existing scientific literature requires further multidisciplinary research, we believe this article will contribute to a better understanding of the importance of ethical harmony of gender equality as the best strategy and practice for negotiating parties in international business negotiations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Research in Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Research in Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.092304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Research in Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.092304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年中,对国际商务谈判中性别平等的伦理方面进行了许多研究。研究表明,尽管女性在解决全球谈判挑战方面取得了成功,但她们的参与仍然有限。虽然这种影响可能不是直接的,但应该指出的是,女性通常被认为不如男性谈判者好。在这个意义上,本文通过对理论话语的分析,来考察当代商务谈判的实践。其目的是指出性别劳动分工的(非)伦理连续性,因此性别不应该预先判断个人,而是他的谈判能力。由于现有的科学文献需要进一步的多学科研究,我们相信本文将有助于更好地理解性别平等的伦理和谐作为谈判各方在国际商务谈判中的最佳策略和实践的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NEGATIVE TREND IN THE POSITIONING OF WOMEN IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS NEGOTIATIONS
Over the past decade, many studies have been conducted on the ethical aspects of gender equality in international business negotiations. Research shows that, despite women’s success in solving global negotiation challenges, their participation is still limited. And while this influence may not be direct, it should be noted that women are generally considered less good negotiators than their male counterparts. In this sense, through analyzing theoretical discourse, this article examines the contemporary practice of business negotiation. The goal is to point out the (un)ethical continuity of the gender division of labor, whereby gender should not prejudge the individual, but rather his negotiation abilities. As the existing scientific literature requires further multidisciplinary research, we believe this article will contribute to a better understanding of the importance of ethical harmony of gender equality as the best strategy and practice for negotiating parties in international business negotiations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Research in Rehabilitation
Human Research in Rehabilitation Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE SPREAD OF EXTREME TERRORISM IN KOSOVO THE LEGAL AND CRIMINAL VIEW OF THESE CRIMES PARATHYROIDECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERPARATHYROIDISM THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL EDUCATION OF YOUNG PEOPLE ON THEIR FINANCIAL PLANNING BEHAVIOUR SATISFACTION WITH THE USE OF HEARING AIDS IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA LEGAL RECORDS OF REAL ESTATE IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - PERSPECTIVES AND NEW TENDENCIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1