Yikang Li, Chenxi Li, Xiaomin Liu, Qian Zhang, Liu Yu
{"title":"创新与传统组合剪力墙体系的有限元模拟与强度评价","authors":"Yikang Li, Chenxi Li, Xiaomin Liu, Qian Zhang, Liu Yu","doi":"10.1002/tal.2060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Composite shear wall (CSW) system, which consists of a steel boundary frame and a steel panel with a reinforced concrete (RC) panel attached to one side of it using bolts, is commonly used in mid‐ to high‐rise buildings. In a CSW system, RC panel functions as out‐of‐plane restraint to prevent overall buckling of steel panel, thereby enhancing system behavior. However, for a traditional CSW system, the RC panel is in direct contact with the steel boundary frame. The RC panel tends to crush under seismic loading, thereby leading to a weak constraint to steel panel buckling. The innovative CSW system, where a gap remained between steel boundary frame and RC panel, demonstrated better cyclic behavior than the traditional CSW system. Current studies aimed to investigate cyclic behavior, parameter effects, and determination of RC panel stiffness of CSW systems. In this paper, detailed FE models were developed for simulating cyclic behavior of both innovative and traditional CSW systems and validated by test results. FE models accurately predicted lateral load‐drift response and failure patterns of both innovative and traditional CSW systems. System failure patterns and load‐carrying mechanism of RC panels were discussed. The effects of major parameters, including steel panel thickness, RC panel thickness, ratio of bolt spacing to steel panel thickness, and gap between frame and RC panel, were examined using the validated models. Simulation results indicated that steel panel thickness contributed to increase the lateral strength and initial stiffness of both innovative and traditional CSW systems. Although RC panel thickness, ratio of bolt spacing to steel panel thickness, and gap between frame and RC panel had negligible effects on system strength and stiffness, they should also be carefully designed to ensure local stability of the steel panel and system ductility. Formulations were proposed for predicting the lateral strength of both innovative and traditional CSW systems. The average difference between calculated and test/simulated lateral strength was less than 3%.","PeriodicalId":49470,"journal":{"name":"Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite element simulation and strength evaluation on innovative and traditional composite shear wall systems\",\"authors\":\"Yikang Li, Chenxi Li, Xiaomin Liu, Qian Zhang, Liu Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tal.2060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Composite shear wall (CSW) system, which consists of a steel boundary frame and a steel panel with a reinforced concrete (RC) panel attached to one side of it using bolts, is commonly used in mid‐ to high‐rise buildings. In a CSW system, RC panel functions as out‐of‐plane restraint to prevent overall buckling of steel panel, thereby enhancing system behavior. However, for a traditional CSW system, the RC panel is in direct contact with the steel boundary frame. The RC panel tends to crush under seismic loading, thereby leading to a weak constraint to steel panel buckling. The innovative CSW system, where a gap remained between steel boundary frame and RC panel, demonstrated better cyclic behavior than the traditional CSW system. Current studies aimed to investigate cyclic behavior, parameter effects, and determination of RC panel stiffness of CSW systems. In this paper, detailed FE models were developed for simulating cyclic behavior of both innovative and traditional CSW systems and validated by test results. FE models accurately predicted lateral load‐drift response and failure patterns of both innovative and traditional CSW systems. System failure patterns and load‐carrying mechanism of RC panels were discussed. The effects of major parameters, including steel panel thickness, RC panel thickness, ratio of bolt spacing to steel panel thickness, and gap between frame and RC panel, were examined using the validated models. Simulation results indicated that steel panel thickness contributed to increase the lateral strength and initial stiffness of both innovative and traditional CSW systems. Although RC panel thickness, ratio of bolt spacing to steel panel thickness, and gap between frame and RC panel had negligible effects on system strength and stiffness, they should also be carefully designed to ensure local stability of the steel panel and system ductility. Formulations were proposed for predicting the lateral strength of both innovative and traditional CSW systems. The average difference between calculated and test/simulated lateral strength was less than 3%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.2060\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.2060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Finite element simulation and strength evaluation on innovative and traditional composite shear wall systems
Summary Composite shear wall (CSW) system, which consists of a steel boundary frame and a steel panel with a reinforced concrete (RC) panel attached to one side of it using bolts, is commonly used in mid‐ to high‐rise buildings. In a CSW system, RC panel functions as out‐of‐plane restraint to prevent overall buckling of steel panel, thereby enhancing system behavior. However, for a traditional CSW system, the RC panel is in direct contact with the steel boundary frame. The RC panel tends to crush under seismic loading, thereby leading to a weak constraint to steel panel buckling. The innovative CSW system, where a gap remained between steel boundary frame and RC panel, demonstrated better cyclic behavior than the traditional CSW system. Current studies aimed to investigate cyclic behavior, parameter effects, and determination of RC panel stiffness of CSW systems. In this paper, detailed FE models were developed for simulating cyclic behavior of both innovative and traditional CSW systems and validated by test results. FE models accurately predicted lateral load‐drift response and failure patterns of both innovative and traditional CSW systems. System failure patterns and load‐carrying mechanism of RC panels were discussed. The effects of major parameters, including steel panel thickness, RC panel thickness, ratio of bolt spacing to steel panel thickness, and gap between frame and RC panel, were examined using the validated models. Simulation results indicated that steel panel thickness contributed to increase the lateral strength and initial stiffness of both innovative and traditional CSW systems. Although RC panel thickness, ratio of bolt spacing to steel panel thickness, and gap between frame and RC panel had negligible effects on system strength and stiffness, they should also be carefully designed to ensure local stability of the steel panel and system ductility. Formulations were proposed for predicting the lateral strength of both innovative and traditional CSW systems. The average difference between calculated and test/simulated lateral strength was less than 3%.
期刊介绍：
The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings provides structural engineers and contractors with a detailed written presentation of innovative structural engineering and construction practices for tall and special buildings. It also presents applied research on new materials or analysis methods that can directly benefit structural engineers involved in the design of tall and special buildings. The editor''s policy is to maintain a reasonable balance between papers from design engineers and from research workers so that the Journal will be useful to both groups. The problems in this field and their solutions are international in character and require a knowledge of several traditional disciplines and the Journal will reflect this.
The main subject of the Journal is the structural design and construction of tall and special buildings. The basic definition of a tall building, in the context of the Journal audience, is a structure that is equal to or greater than 50 meters (165 feet) in height, or 14 stories or greater. A special building is one with unique architectural or structural characteristics.
However, manuscripts dealing with chimneys, water towers, silos, cooling towers, and pools will generally not be considered for review. The journal will present papers on new innovative structural systems, materials and methods of analysis.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
