人身监护安排、儿童年龄和儿童心理健康:德国和挪威的比较

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Comparative Family Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.3138/jcfs.54.2.020
Lara Augustijn, Anja Steinbach, Tonje Holt, Maren Sand Helland, Linda Larsen
{"title":"人身监护安排、儿童年龄和儿童心理健康:德国和挪威的比较","authors":"Lara Augustijn, Anja Steinbach, Tonje Holt, Maren Sand Helland, Linda Larsen","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.54.2.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated potential differences in mental health among children living in sole physical custody (SPC), asymmetric joint physical custody (JPC), and symmetric JPC; and it tested whether children’s age moderated the association between physical custody arrangements and children’s mental health. Using data from the Family Models in Germany (FAMOD) and Norwegian Dynamics of Family Conflict (FAMC) studies, we estimated OLS regression models for children aged 2 to 14. In the German sample, children in asymmetric JPC had fewer mental health problems than children in SPC. However, this difference disappeared when controlling for various background variables, including the quality of parent-child relationships. Additionally, children’s age moderated the association between physical custody arrangements and children’s mental health problems, with increasing age being related to fewer mental health problems in asymmetric JPC. This association remained even after controlling for the background variables. In the Norwegian sample, no differences were found in children’s mental health across physical custody arrangements; nor did children’s age moderate the association. The results of this study emphasize that there may be cultural differences in how children’s mental health is related to their physical custody arrangements. Furthermore, there are modest indications that asymmetric JPC may be related to better mental health among older children in Germany.","PeriodicalId":47212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Custody Arrangements, Children’s Age, and Children’s Mental Health: A Comparison of Germany and Norway\",\"authors\":\"Lara Augustijn, Anja Steinbach, Tonje Holt, Maren Sand Helland, Linda Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/jcfs.54.2.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated potential differences in mental health among children living in sole physical custody (SPC), asymmetric joint physical custody (JPC), and symmetric JPC; and it tested whether children’s age moderated the association between physical custody arrangements and children’s mental health. Using data from the Family Models in Germany (FAMOD) and Norwegian Dynamics of Family Conflict (FAMC) studies, we estimated OLS regression models for children aged 2 to 14. In the German sample, children in asymmetric JPC had fewer mental health problems than children in SPC. However, this difference disappeared when controlling for various background variables, including the quality of parent-child relationships. Additionally, children’s age moderated the association between physical custody arrangements and children’s mental health problems, with increasing age being related to fewer mental health problems in asymmetric JPC. This association remained even after controlling for the background variables. In the Norwegian sample, no differences were found in children’s mental health across physical custody arrangements; nor did children’s age moderate the association. The results of this study emphasize that there may be cultural differences in how children’s mental health is related to their physical custody arrangements. Furthermore, there are modest indications that asymmetric JPC may be related to better mental health among older children in Germany.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Family Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Family Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.54.2.020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.54.2.020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了单独监护权(SPC)、非对称共同监护权(JPC)和对称共同监护权(JPC)儿童心理健康的潜在差异。该研究还测试了儿童的年龄是否会调节身体监护安排与儿童心理健康之间的关系。使用来自德国家庭模型(FAMOD)和挪威家庭冲突动力学(FAMC)研究的数据,我们估计了2至14岁儿童的OLS回归模型。在德国样本中,非对称JPC的儿童比SPC的儿童有更少的心理健康问题。然而,当控制各种背景变量,包括亲子关系的质量,这种差异就消失了。此外,儿童年龄调节了实际监护安排与儿童心理健康问题之间的关系,非对称JPC中年龄的增加与心理健康问题的减少有关。即使在控制了背景变量之后,这种关联仍然存在。在挪威的样本中,在实际监护安排中没有发现儿童心理健康的差异;儿童的年龄也没有缓和这种联系。本研究的结果强调,儿童的心理健康与他们的身体监护安排之间的关系可能存在文化差异。此外,有少量迹象表明,不对称的JPC可能与德国较大儿童的心理健康状况较好有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical Custody Arrangements, Children’s Age, and Children’s Mental Health: A Comparison of Germany and Norway
This study investigated potential differences in mental health among children living in sole physical custody (SPC), asymmetric joint physical custody (JPC), and symmetric JPC; and it tested whether children’s age moderated the association between physical custody arrangements and children’s mental health. Using data from the Family Models in Germany (FAMOD) and Norwegian Dynamics of Family Conflict (FAMC) studies, we estimated OLS regression models for children aged 2 to 14. In the German sample, children in asymmetric JPC had fewer mental health problems than children in SPC. However, this difference disappeared when controlling for various background variables, including the quality of parent-child relationships. Additionally, children’s age moderated the association between physical custody arrangements and children’s mental health problems, with increasing age being related to fewer mental health problems in asymmetric JPC. This association remained even after controlling for the background variables. In the Norwegian sample, no differences were found in children’s mental health across physical custody arrangements; nor did children’s age moderate the association. The results of this study emphasize that there may be cultural differences in how children’s mental health is related to their physical custody arrangements. Furthermore, there are modest indications that asymmetric JPC may be related to better mental health among older children in Germany.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Do Living Conditions Differ Among Different Types of Single Mothers?: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam Physical Custody Arrangements, Children’s Age, and Children’s Mental Health: A Comparison of Germany and Norway Changes in Policy, Changes in Fertility? An Examination of Changes in Fertility Aspirations in China South Korea’s Fertility Puzzle: A Mismatch Between Sustained Childbearing Desires and Declining Fertility Dobrotić, Ivana, Sonja Blum, Alison Koslowski (Eds.). Research Handbook on Leave Policy: Parenting and Social Inequalities in a Global Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1