Sharkia省剖宫产术中不同类型宫内节育器后胎盘植入与延迟宫内节育器植入的比较

Waleed Tawfik, AMAL AMIN, Mahmoud Fayed, Yousef Abdelzaher
{"title":"Sharkia省剖宫产术中不同类型宫内节育器后胎盘植入与延迟宫内节育器植入的比较","authors":"Waleed Tawfik, AMAL AMIN, Mahmoud Fayed, Yousef Abdelzaher","doi":"10.21608/bmfj.2023.233204.1886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: An intrauterine device (IUD) is a small, often T-shaped birth control device that is inserted into the uterus to prevent pregnancy. IUDs are one form of long-acting reversible birth control (LARC). This study's objective was to compare between post placental insertions of different types of IUD (PPIUD) during cesarean section versus delayed IUD (DIUD) insertion. Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted on 300 women who delivered via uncomplicated cesarean section and seeking IUD contraception. Patients were divided into two equal groups: PPIUD group: women received post placental insertion of different types of IUD (50 received copper T, 50 received Nova T, and 50 received multiload). DIUD Group: women received delayed insertion of different types of IUD (50 received copper T, 50 received Nova T, and 50 received multiload). Results: At 12 months follow-up there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups as regards complications. As regards satisfaction rates, 129 were satisfied with the IUD in the DIUD group, and 118 were satisfied with the IUD in PPIUD, and this difference was not statistically significant (p >0.05). Prevalence of outcomes according to type of device in patients in DIUD group, data was insignificant in all outcomes except bleeding. Conclusions: Post-placental insertion of IUD during a cesarean section appears to be a more effective and convenient method of contraception compared to delayed insertion of an IUD. This study showed that post-placental IUD insertion is associated with lower rates of expulsion, thread visibility and menorrhagia compared to delayed insertion.","PeriodicalId":8803,"journal":{"name":"Benha Veterinary Medical Journal","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post Placental Insertion of Different Types of Intrauterine Device During Cesarean Section versus Delayed Intrauterine Device Insertion in Sharkia Governorate\",\"authors\":\"Waleed Tawfik, AMAL AMIN, Mahmoud Fayed, Yousef Abdelzaher\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/bmfj.2023.233204.1886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Background: An intrauterine device (IUD) is a small, often T-shaped birth control device that is inserted into the uterus to prevent pregnancy. IUDs are one form of long-acting reversible birth control (LARC). This study's objective was to compare between post placental insertions of different types of IUD (PPIUD) during cesarean section versus delayed IUD (DIUD) insertion. Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted on 300 women who delivered via uncomplicated cesarean section and seeking IUD contraception. Patients were divided into two equal groups: PPIUD group: women received post placental insertion of different types of IUD (50 received copper T, 50 received Nova T, and 50 received multiload). DIUD Group: women received delayed insertion of different types of IUD (50 received copper T, 50 received Nova T, and 50 received multiload). Results: At 12 months follow-up there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups as regards complications. As regards satisfaction rates, 129 were satisfied with the IUD in the DIUD group, and 118 were satisfied with the IUD in PPIUD, and this difference was not statistically significant (p >0.05). Prevalence of outcomes according to type of device in patients in DIUD group, data was insignificant in all outcomes except bleeding. Conclusions: Post-placental insertion of IUD during a cesarean section appears to be a more effective and convenient method of contraception compared to delayed insertion of an IUD. This study showed that post-placental IUD insertion is associated with lower rates of expulsion, thread visibility and menorrhagia compared to delayed insertion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Benha Veterinary Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Benha Veterinary Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2023.233204.1886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Veterinary Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2023.233204.1886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post Placental Insertion of Different Types of Intrauterine Device During Cesarean Section versus Delayed Intrauterine Device Insertion in Sharkia Governorate
: Background: An intrauterine device (IUD) is a small, often T-shaped birth control device that is inserted into the uterus to prevent pregnancy. IUDs are one form of long-acting reversible birth control (LARC). This study's objective was to compare between post placental insertions of different types of IUD (PPIUD) during cesarean section versus delayed IUD (DIUD) insertion. Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted on 300 women who delivered via uncomplicated cesarean section and seeking IUD contraception. Patients were divided into two equal groups: PPIUD group: women received post placental insertion of different types of IUD (50 received copper T, 50 received Nova T, and 50 received multiload). DIUD Group: women received delayed insertion of different types of IUD (50 received copper T, 50 received Nova T, and 50 received multiload). Results: At 12 months follow-up there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups as regards complications. As regards satisfaction rates, 129 were satisfied with the IUD in the DIUD group, and 118 were satisfied with the IUD in PPIUD, and this difference was not statistically significant (p >0.05). Prevalence of outcomes according to type of device in patients in DIUD group, data was insignificant in all outcomes except bleeding. Conclusions: Post-placental insertion of IUD during a cesarean section appears to be a more effective and convenient method of contraception compared to delayed insertion of an IUD. This study showed that post-placental IUD insertion is associated with lower rates of expulsion, thread visibility and menorrhagia compared to delayed insertion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cowpea 11S globulin spray quadruples shrimp shelf-life and maintains freshness Prevalence of some Foodborne Pathogens (FBPs) in imported chilled and frozen beef in Egypt Evaluation of the antidiabetic and hepatoprotective effect of Origanum majorana leaf extract and its nanoparticles in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats Ameliorative effect of lemon balm on eltroxin induced-hyperthyroidism in rats Molecular characterization of isolated duck viral hepatitis and its pathogenicity in one day and seven day old ducklings in Qalyubia governorate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1