使用新提出的浆液细胞学报告国际系统的标准化细胞病理学报告-单一机构经验

Murugan R, Kandasamy S, Gunasekaran KP, Ramalingam GS, Kulandaivel AL
{"title":"使用新提出的浆液细胞学报告国际系统的标准化细胞病理学报告-单一机构经验","authors":"Murugan R, Kandasamy S, Gunasekaran KP, Ramalingam GS, Kulandaivel AL","doi":"10.17727/jmsr.2023/11-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Serous fluids are commonly produced in many disease conditions and it is relatively easy to collect it. Subjecting it to analysis will help identify the etiology of the disease process and thereby help the clinicians to plan the treatment strategy appropriately. The application of the international system for reporting serous fluid cytology will further make it easy for the clinicians with its simpler terminologies and clear categorization of entities. Materials and method: All effusion samples that were received from 2020 to 2022 were examined and categorized according to international system for reporting serous fluid cytology. Risk of malignancy (ROM) was also calculated. Results: Among 400 cases, 140 (35%) were pleural fluid, 260 (65%) were ascitic fluid. Among 140 pleural fluid, 8 (5.7%) were ND, 121 (86.4%) were NFM, 2 (1.4%) were AUS, 5(3.6%) were SFM and 4 (2.9%) were MAL. Among the 260 peritoneal fluid, 13 (5%), 226 (86.9%), 9 (3.5%), 9 (3.5%), and 3 (1.1%) were reported as ND, NFM, AUS, SFM and MAL respectively. Risk of Malignancy (ROM) calculated for the cases collected in this study were 0% for ND, 0.9% for NFM, 45.5% for AUS, 71.4% for SFM and 100% for MAL. Conclusion: The international system (TIS) for reporting serous fluid cytopathology is very easy to employ and gives high accuracy with clear diagnostic criteria for each category, hence makes it easy to communicate with the clinicians by employing simple terminologies.","PeriodicalId":32890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Scientific Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardized cytopathology reporting of fluids using newly proposed international system for reporting serous fluid cytology - A single institutional experience\",\"authors\":\"Murugan R, Kandasamy S, Gunasekaran KP, Ramalingam GS, Kulandaivel AL\",\"doi\":\"10.17727/jmsr.2023/11-41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Serous fluids are commonly produced in many disease conditions and it is relatively easy to collect it. Subjecting it to analysis will help identify the etiology of the disease process and thereby help the clinicians to plan the treatment strategy appropriately. The application of the international system for reporting serous fluid cytology will further make it easy for the clinicians with its simpler terminologies and clear categorization of entities. Materials and method: All effusion samples that were received from 2020 to 2022 were examined and categorized according to international system for reporting serous fluid cytology. Risk of malignancy (ROM) was also calculated. Results: Among 400 cases, 140 (35%) were pleural fluid, 260 (65%) were ascitic fluid. Among 140 pleural fluid, 8 (5.7%) were ND, 121 (86.4%) were NFM, 2 (1.4%) were AUS, 5(3.6%) were SFM and 4 (2.9%) were MAL. Among the 260 peritoneal fluid, 13 (5%), 226 (86.9%), 9 (3.5%), 9 (3.5%), and 3 (1.1%) were reported as ND, NFM, AUS, SFM and MAL respectively. Risk of Malignancy (ROM) calculated for the cases collected in this study were 0% for ND, 0.9% for NFM, 45.5% for AUS, 71.4% for SFM and 100% for MAL. Conclusion: The international system (TIS) for reporting serous fluid cytopathology is very easy to employ and gives high accuracy with clear diagnostic criteria for each category, hence makes it easy to communicate with the clinicians by employing simple terminologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical and Scientific Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical and Scientific Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17727/jmsr.2023/11-41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17727/jmsr.2023/11-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:浆液通常在许多疾病条件下产生,并且相对容易收集。对其进行分析将有助于确定疾病过程的病因,从而帮助临床医生制定适当的治疗策略。国际浆液细胞学报告系统的应用将使临床医生更容易使用其更简单的术语和明确的实体分类。材料和方法:根据国际浆液细胞学报告系统对2020 - 2022年收到的所有积液样本进行检查和分类。恶性风险(ROM)也被计算。结果:400例患者中,140例(35%)为胸腔积液,260例(65%)为腹水。140例胸膜液中ND 8例(5.7%),NFM 121例(86.4%),AUS 2例(1.4%),SFM 5例(3.6%),MAL 4例(2.9%)。260例腹膜液中ND、NFM、AUS、SFM、MAL分别为13例(5%)、226例(86.9%)、9例(3.5%)、9例(3.5%)、3例(1.1%)。本研究收集的病例计算的恶性肿瘤风险(Risk of malignant, ROM)为:ND为0%,NFM为0.9%,AUS为45.5%,SFM为71.4%,MAL为100%。结论:浆液细胞病理学报告的国际系统(TIS)易于使用,准确率高,每一类诊断标准明确,因此使用简单的术语便于与临床医生沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standardized cytopathology reporting of fluids using newly proposed international system for reporting serous fluid cytology - A single institutional experience
Background: Serous fluids are commonly produced in many disease conditions and it is relatively easy to collect it. Subjecting it to analysis will help identify the etiology of the disease process and thereby help the clinicians to plan the treatment strategy appropriately. The application of the international system for reporting serous fluid cytology will further make it easy for the clinicians with its simpler terminologies and clear categorization of entities. Materials and method: All effusion samples that were received from 2020 to 2022 were examined and categorized according to international system for reporting serous fluid cytology. Risk of malignancy (ROM) was also calculated. Results: Among 400 cases, 140 (35%) were pleural fluid, 260 (65%) were ascitic fluid. Among 140 pleural fluid, 8 (5.7%) were ND, 121 (86.4%) were NFM, 2 (1.4%) were AUS, 5(3.6%) were SFM and 4 (2.9%) were MAL. Among the 260 peritoneal fluid, 13 (5%), 226 (86.9%), 9 (3.5%), 9 (3.5%), and 3 (1.1%) were reported as ND, NFM, AUS, SFM and MAL respectively. Risk of Malignancy (ROM) calculated for the cases collected in this study were 0% for ND, 0.9% for NFM, 45.5% for AUS, 71.4% for SFM and 100% for MAL. Conclusion: The international system (TIS) for reporting serous fluid cytopathology is very easy to employ and gives high accuracy with clear diagnostic criteria for each category, hence makes it easy to communicate with the clinicians by employing simple terminologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of beliefs and attitude towards blood donation among the population of Tumkur district: A cross sectional study A cross sectional study on seroprevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections among blood donors at tertiary care hospital Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without concomitant meniscal repair: A prospective comparative study Demystifying the three different types of COVID-19 associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: Experience from a tertiary care hospital An observational study of gastrointestinal stromal tumors by histopathology and immunohistochemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1