测试一屋顶,以优化印尼公民的监管制度

Ahmad Gelora Mahardika
{"title":"测试一屋顶,以优化印尼公民的监管制度","authors":"Ahmad Gelora Mahardika","doi":"10.52947/morality.v9i1.311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disharmonization of Indonesia's regulatory system has become a complicated issue. Many factors cause it. One of the factors causing disharmony of statutory regulations is the absence of centralized review of statutory regulations in a separate institution. Based on Articles 24A and 24C of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the review of statutory regulations in the Indonesian constitutional system is carried out by two separate institutions, namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The decisions of the two judiciary institutions are final and binding and cannot be appealed, so the decisions must be implemented. Problems occur in the Indonesian constitutional system when the two institutions issue conflicting decisions, resulting in legal uncertainty regarding which norms should be applied. Therefore, one rooftop testing is something that is urgent to be implemented in the Indonesian constitutional system, as an effort to create regulatory harmonization. The research method used in this research is normative juridical. The research hypothesis is that a one-stop examination is necessary and should be given to the Constitutional Court.","PeriodicalId":231432,"journal":{"name":"MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengujian Satu Atap Sebagai Optimalisasi Penataan Regulasi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Gelora Mahardika\",\"doi\":\"10.52947/morality.v9i1.311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disharmonization of Indonesia's regulatory system has become a complicated issue. Many factors cause it. One of the factors causing disharmony of statutory regulations is the absence of centralized review of statutory regulations in a separate institution. Based on Articles 24A and 24C of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the review of statutory regulations in the Indonesian constitutional system is carried out by two separate institutions, namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The decisions of the two judiciary institutions are final and binding and cannot be appealed, so the decisions must be implemented. Problems occur in the Indonesian constitutional system when the two institutions issue conflicting decisions, resulting in legal uncertainty regarding which norms should be applied. Therefore, one rooftop testing is something that is urgent to be implemented in the Indonesian constitutional system, as an effort to create regulatory harmonization. The research method used in this research is normative juridical. The research hypothesis is that a one-stop examination is necessary and should be given to the Constitutional Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v9i1.311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v9i1.311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印尼监管体系的不协调已经成为一个复杂的问题。许多因素导致它。造成法规不协调的因素之一是没有在单独的机构中对法规进行集中审查。根据1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》第24A和24C条,印度尼西亚宪法制度中的法定条例的审查由两个独立的机构,即最高法院和宪法法院进行。这两个司法机构的决定是最终的、有约束力的,不能上诉,因此必须执行。当这两个机构发布相互冲突的决定时,印度尼西亚的宪法制度就会出现问题,导致在法律上不确定应该适用哪些规范。因此,屋顶测试是印尼宪法体系中急需实施的一项措施,作为建立监管协调的一项努力。本研究采用的研究方法是规范法学。研究假设是,有必要由宪法法院进行一站式审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pengujian Satu Atap Sebagai Optimalisasi Penataan Regulasi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia
Disharmonization of Indonesia's regulatory system has become a complicated issue. Many factors cause it. One of the factors causing disharmony of statutory regulations is the absence of centralized review of statutory regulations in a separate institution. Based on Articles 24A and 24C of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the review of statutory regulations in the Indonesian constitutional system is carried out by two separate institutions, namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The decisions of the two judiciary institutions are final and binding and cannot be appealed, so the decisions must be implemented. Problems occur in the Indonesian constitutional system when the two institutions issue conflicting decisions, resulting in legal uncertainty regarding which norms should be applied. Therefore, one rooftop testing is something that is urgent to be implemented in the Indonesian constitutional system, as an effort to create regulatory harmonization. The research method used in this research is normative juridical. The research hypothesis is that a one-stop examination is necessary and should be given to the Constitutional Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Budaya Korupsi Dan Kebijakan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Pencegahan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan Pada Sektor Perbankan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Covid-19 Sebagai Keadaan Overmacht Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kedudukan Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Analisis Yuridis Prinsip Teritorial Pada Cross Border Insolvency Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia Penafsiran Otoritatif dan Hermeneutika Yuridis Pada Frasa Repertorium Kewajiban Notaris
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1