结构化的学习环境:心理教育报告中建议的通用性

IF 1.8 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Inclusive Education Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1080/13603116.2023.2258371
Thomas Szulevicz, Jon Busck Arnfred
{"title":"结构化的学习环境:心理教育报告中建议的通用性","authors":"Thomas Szulevicz, Jon Busck Arnfred","doi":"10.1080/13603116.2023.2258371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper analyses the recommendation section in psychoeducational reports. With educational psychologists (EPs) spending increasing time writing psychoeducational reports, the present study was conducted to analyse and assess the recommendations made by EPs in psychoeducational reports. Based on analysis of 109 psychoeducational reports from two Danish municipalities a highly interesting pattern was identified, as the need for clear structure in the learning environment was part of the recommendation section in 107 (98, 2%) of 109 analysed reports. An almost similar and identical recommendation was thus repeated across the reports, and the finding is used to discuss what this pattern in the recommendation of EP indicates about EP practices in general and EP’s report writing practices more specifically. The article concludes with a discussion in which the repeated ‘need-for-clear-structure-recommendation’ is understood in light of recent socio-political and global transformations within educational systems.KEYWORDS: Psychoeducational reportseducational psychology practicestructured learninginclusion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by TrygFonden [grant number 150499].Notes on contributorsThomas SzuleviczThomas Szulevicz is an associate professor of educational psychology. His main research interests are inclusive education and educational psychology practice.Jon Busck ArnfredJon Busck Arnfred has a background as a medical doctor, and he is now a postdoctoral research associate at the Department Communication and Psychology at Aalborg University","PeriodicalId":48025,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Inclusive Education","volume":"309 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A structured learning envi ronment: the generic nature of recommendations in psychoeducational reports\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Szulevicz, Jon Busck Arnfred\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13603116.2023.2258371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis paper analyses the recommendation section in psychoeducational reports. With educational psychologists (EPs) spending increasing time writing psychoeducational reports, the present study was conducted to analyse and assess the recommendations made by EPs in psychoeducational reports. Based on analysis of 109 psychoeducational reports from two Danish municipalities a highly interesting pattern was identified, as the need for clear structure in the learning environment was part of the recommendation section in 107 (98, 2%) of 109 analysed reports. An almost similar and identical recommendation was thus repeated across the reports, and the finding is used to discuss what this pattern in the recommendation of EP indicates about EP practices in general and EP’s report writing practices more specifically. The article concludes with a discussion in which the repeated ‘need-for-clear-structure-recommendation’ is understood in light of recent socio-political and global transformations within educational systems.KEYWORDS: Psychoeducational reportseducational psychology practicestructured learninginclusion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by TrygFonden [grant number 150499].Notes on contributorsThomas SzuleviczThomas Szulevicz is an associate professor of educational psychology. His main research interests are inclusive education and educational psychology practice.Jon Busck ArnfredJon Busck Arnfred has a background as a medical doctor, and he is now a postdoctoral research associate at the Department Communication and Psychology at Aalborg University\",\"PeriodicalId\":48025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Inclusive Education\",\"volume\":\"309 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Inclusive Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2258371\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Inclusive Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2258371","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文分析了心理教育报告中的推荐部分。随着教育心理学家撰写心理教育报告的时间越来越长,本研究旨在分析和评估教育心理学家在心理教育报告中提出的建议。根据对来自两个丹麦城市的109份心理教育报告的分析,发现了一个非常有趣的模式,因为109份分析报告中107份(98.2%)的建议部分需要明确的学习环境结构。因此,在报告中重复了一个几乎相似和相同的建议,并且该发现用于讨论EP建议中的这种模式对EP实践的一般意义和EP报告写作实践的更具体意义。文章最后进行了讨论,在讨论中,根据最近教育系统内的社会政治和全球变革,反复出现的“需要明确的结构建议”被理解。关键词:心理教育报告教育心理学实践结构化学习包容披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由TrygFonden资助[资助号150499]。作者简介:thomas Szulevicz,教育心理学副教授。主要研究方向为全纳教育和教育心理学实践。Jon Busck Arnfred有医学博士的背景,他现在是奥尔堡大学传播与心理学系的博士后研究员
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A structured learning envi ronment: the generic nature of recommendations in psychoeducational reports
ABSTRACTThis paper analyses the recommendation section in psychoeducational reports. With educational psychologists (EPs) spending increasing time writing psychoeducational reports, the present study was conducted to analyse and assess the recommendations made by EPs in psychoeducational reports. Based on analysis of 109 psychoeducational reports from two Danish municipalities a highly interesting pattern was identified, as the need for clear structure in the learning environment was part of the recommendation section in 107 (98, 2%) of 109 analysed reports. An almost similar and identical recommendation was thus repeated across the reports, and the finding is used to discuss what this pattern in the recommendation of EP indicates about EP practices in general and EP’s report writing practices more specifically. The article concludes with a discussion in which the repeated ‘need-for-clear-structure-recommendation’ is understood in light of recent socio-political and global transformations within educational systems.KEYWORDS: Psychoeducational reportseducational psychology practicestructured learninginclusion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by TrygFonden [grant number 150499].Notes on contributorsThomas SzuleviczThomas Szulevicz is an associate professor of educational psychology. His main research interests are inclusive education and educational psychology practice.Jon Busck ArnfredJon Busck Arnfred has a background as a medical doctor, and he is now a postdoctoral research associate at the Department Communication and Psychology at Aalborg University
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Inclusive Education
International Journal of Inclusive Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Inclusive Education provides a strategic forum for international and multi-disciplinary dialogue on inclusive education for all educators and educational policy-makers concerned with the form and nature of schools, universities and technical colleges. Papers published are original, refereed, multi-disciplinary research into pedagogies, curricula, organizational structures, policy-making, administration and cultures to include all students in education. The journal does not accept enrolment in school, college or university as a measure of inclusion. The focus is upon the nature of exclusion and on research, policy and practices that generate greater options for all people in education and beyond.
期刊最新文献
‘We need to change our way of thinking about education’: a thematic analysis of university staff’s experience supporting autistic students in France Can we talk? A correspondence study to examine responsiveness of physical educators to requests for a phone call from parents of children with disabilities Towards inclusion: a comparative examination of the status of disability acts in South Asia Parents and the gender and sexual violence assemblage in a rural school Transformative teaching around the world: Stories of cultural impact, technology integration, and innovative pedagogy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1