伊朗电子健康档案的建立和利用:对过去四十年政策文件的回顾

Q3 Medicine Shiraz E Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.5812/semj-137492
Mohammad Bakhtiari Aliabad, Niusha Sadeghi, Mahdi Mokhtari-Payam, Somayeh Seddighi, Seyed Jafar Ehsanzadehsorati, Fatemeh Mohammad Beygi
{"title":"伊朗电子健康档案的建立和利用:对过去四十年政策文件的回顾","authors":"Mohammad Bakhtiari Aliabad, Niusha Sadeghi, Mahdi Mokhtari-Payam, Somayeh Seddighi, Seyed Jafar Ehsanzadehsorati, Fatemeh Mohammad Beygi","doi":"10.5812/semj-137492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study presents the legal obligations set for the main stakeholders in the establishment and implementation of electronic health (e-health) records in Iran and investigates the fulfillment of these obligations. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using document analysis. The research population comprised all the documents, laws, reports, and policies of the establishment and utilization of electronic health records in Iran. Sampling was purposive, and all the internal documents of Iran were included until the end of May 2022. A data extraction form was used to collect the data, and Scott's criterion was used to select the documents. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Based on the documents, 56% of the sentences were implemented, and 22% were not enforced according to the assigned tasks. The status of the execution of tasks by the main players was also extracted. The most important of these included the drafting of the electronic health security and privacy regulations, not providing the conditions for receiving electronic copies in the e-records, creating internal automation for the Ministry of Health and Medical Education instead of the e-health records system, instability of the integrated portal for exchanging health information and disconnection of the majority of service centers, eliminating the extension of the validity of paper booklets, operationalizing the online entitlement system, using the first phase of the electronic prescription project, not inserting nursing notes in the records, recording financial and administrative information instead of clinical ones, refusal of numerous doctors to write electronic prescriptions, using an alternative method of two-step verification instead of electronic signature, the progress of coding and drug authenticity, and the non-implementation of medical equipment coding. Conclusions: Reviewing the status of the enforcement of approvals also revealed that the format of actions since 2018 has ended with a positive result. The main achievement so far has been electronic prescription, while it should be noted that prescription is only part of the electronic health record project.","PeriodicalId":39157,"journal":{"name":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment and Utilization of Electronic Health Records in Iran: A Review of the Policy Documents of the Past Four Decades\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Bakhtiari Aliabad, Niusha Sadeghi, Mahdi Mokhtari-Payam, Somayeh Seddighi, Seyed Jafar Ehsanzadehsorati, Fatemeh Mohammad Beygi\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/semj-137492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study presents the legal obligations set for the main stakeholders in the establishment and implementation of electronic health (e-health) records in Iran and investigates the fulfillment of these obligations. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using document analysis. The research population comprised all the documents, laws, reports, and policies of the establishment and utilization of electronic health records in Iran. Sampling was purposive, and all the internal documents of Iran were included until the end of May 2022. A data extraction form was used to collect the data, and Scott's criterion was used to select the documents. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Based on the documents, 56% of the sentences were implemented, and 22% were not enforced according to the assigned tasks. The status of the execution of tasks by the main players was also extracted. The most important of these included the drafting of the electronic health security and privacy regulations, not providing the conditions for receiving electronic copies in the e-records, creating internal automation for the Ministry of Health and Medical Education instead of the e-health records system, instability of the integrated portal for exchanging health information and disconnection of the majority of service centers, eliminating the extension of the validity of paper booklets, operationalizing the online entitlement system, using the first phase of the electronic prescription project, not inserting nursing notes in the records, recording financial and administrative information instead of clinical ones, refusal of numerous doctors to write electronic prescriptions, using an alternative method of two-step verification instead of electronic signature, the progress of coding and drug authenticity, and the non-implementation of medical equipment coding. Conclusions: Reviewing the status of the enforcement of approvals also revealed that the format of actions since 2018 has ended with a positive result. The main achievement so far has been electronic prescription, while it should be noted that prescription is only part of the electronic health record project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shiraz E Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shiraz E Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-137492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-137492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究提出了在伊朗建立和实施电子健康(e-health)记录的主要利益相关者的法律义务,并调查了这些义务的履行情况。方法:采用文献分析法进行定性研究。研究对象包括伊朗建立和利用电子健康记录的所有文件、法律、报告和政策。抽样是有目的的,直到2022年5月底,伊朗的所有内部文件都被纳入。使用数据提取表收集数据,使用Scott标准选择文档。采用描述性分析对数据进行分析。结果:根据文件,56%的句子得到了执行,22%的句子没有按照指定的任务执行。还提取了主要参与者执行任务的状态。其中最重要的包括起草电子卫生安全和隐私条例,不提供接收电子记录中的电子副本的条件,为卫生和医学教育部创建内部自动化系统,而不是电子卫生记录系统,交换卫生信息的综合门户网站不稳定,大多数服务中心断开连接,取消纸质小册子的有效期延长,在线授权系统的运行,使用电子处方项目的第一阶段,在记录中不插入护理笔记,记录财务和行政信息而不是临床信息,许多医生拒绝写电子处方,使用两步验证替代电子签名的替代方法,编码和药物真实性的进展,以及未实施医疗设备编码。结论:审查批准的执行状况还显示,自2018年以来的行动形式已取得积极成果。到目前为止,主要的成果是电子处方,但需要注意的是,处方只是电子健康档案项目的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Establishment and Utilization of Electronic Health Records in Iran: A Review of the Policy Documents of the Past Four Decades
Background: This study presents the legal obligations set for the main stakeholders in the establishment and implementation of electronic health (e-health) records in Iran and investigates the fulfillment of these obligations. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using document analysis. The research population comprised all the documents, laws, reports, and policies of the establishment and utilization of electronic health records in Iran. Sampling was purposive, and all the internal documents of Iran were included until the end of May 2022. A data extraction form was used to collect the data, and Scott's criterion was used to select the documents. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Based on the documents, 56% of the sentences were implemented, and 22% were not enforced according to the assigned tasks. The status of the execution of tasks by the main players was also extracted. The most important of these included the drafting of the electronic health security and privacy regulations, not providing the conditions for receiving electronic copies in the e-records, creating internal automation for the Ministry of Health and Medical Education instead of the e-health records system, instability of the integrated portal for exchanging health information and disconnection of the majority of service centers, eliminating the extension of the validity of paper booklets, operationalizing the online entitlement system, using the first phase of the electronic prescription project, not inserting nursing notes in the records, recording financial and administrative information instead of clinical ones, refusal of numerous doctors to write electronic prescriptions, using an alternative method of two-step verification instead of electronic signature, the progress of coding and drug authenticity, and the non-implementation of medical equipment coding. Conclusions: Reviewing the status of the enforcement of approvals also revealed that the format of actions since 2018 has ended with a positive result. The main achievement so far has been electronic prescription, while it should be noted that prescription is only part of the electronic health record project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shiraz E Medical Journal
Shiraz E Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Patterns of Midface and Mandible Fractures in a Government Hospital. Attitudes of Healthcare Professionals and Internship Students Toward Patient Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Qom, Iran, 2021 Diagnosis of Rib Fracture and Related Complications in Patients with Blunt Chest Wall Trauma Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography Scan Artificial Intelligence and Its Potential Applications to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic Exploring the Potential of Chatbots in Medical Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1