ROAD2H:开发和评估用于管理共病和临床指南的开源可解释人工智能方法

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Learning Health Systems Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1002/lrh2.10391
Jesús Domínguez, Denys Prociuk, Branko Marović, Kristijonas Čyras, Oana Cocarascu, Francis Ruiz, Ella Mi, Emma Mi, Christian Ramtale, Antonio Rago, Ara Darzi, Francesca Toni, Vasa Curcin, Brendan Delaney
{"title":"ROAD2H:开发和评估用于管理共病和临床指南的开源可解释人工智能方法","authors":"Jesús Domínguez,&nbsp;Denys Prociuk,&nbsp;Branko Marović,&nbsp;Kristijonas Čyras,&nbsp;Oana Cocarascu,&nbsp;Francis Ruiz,&nbsp;Ella Mi,&nbsp;Emma Mi,&nbsp;Christian Ramtale,&nbsp;Antonio Rago,&nbsp;Ara Darzi,&nbsp;Francesca Toni,&nbsp;Vasa Curcin,&nbsp;Brendan Delaney","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical decision support (CDS) systems (CDSSs) that integrate clinical guidelines need to reflect real-world co-morbidity. In patient-specific clinical contexts, transparent recommendations that allow for contraindications and other conflicts arising from co-morbidity are a requirement. In this work, we develop and evaluate a non-proprietary, standards-based approach to the deployment of computable guidelines with explainable argumentation, integrated with a commercial electronic health record (EHR) system in Serbia, a middle-income country in West Balkans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used an ontological framework, the Transition-based Medical Recommendation (TMR) model, to represent, and reason about, guideline concepts, and chose the 2017 International global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guideline and a Serbian hospital as the deployment and evaluation site, respectively. To mitigate potential guideline conflicts, we used a TMR-based implementation of the Assumptions-Based Argumentation framework extended with preferences and Goals (ABA+G). Remote EHR integration of computable guidelines was via a microservice architecture based on HL7 FHIR and CDS Hooks. A prototype integration was developed to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with comorbid cardiovascular or chronic kidney diseases, and a mixed-methods evaluation was conducted with 20 simulated cases and five pulmonologists.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pulmonologists agreed 97% of the time with the GOLD-based COPD symptom severity assessment assigned to each patient by the CDSS, and 98% of the time with one of the proposed COPD care plans. Comments were favourable on the principles of explainable argumentation; inclusion of additional co-morbidities was suggested in the future along with customisation of the level of explanation with expertise.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An ontological model provided a flexible means of providing argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence for a long-term condition. Extension to other guidelines and multiple co-morbidities is needed to test the approach further.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10391","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ROAD2H: Development and evaluation of an open-source explainable artificial intelligence approach for managing co-morbidity and clinical guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Domínguez,&nbsp;Denys Prociuk,&nbsp;Branko Marović,&nbsp;Kristijonas Čyras,&nbsp;Oana Cocarascu,&nbsp;Francis Ruiz,&nbsp;Ella Mi,&nbsp;Emma Mi,&nbsp;Christian Ramtale,&nbsp;Antonio Rago,&nbsp;Ara Darzi,&nbsp;Francesca Toni,&nbsp;Vasa Curcin,&nbsp;Brendan Delaney\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lrh2.10391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinical decision support (CDS) systems (CDSSs) that integrate clinical guidelines need to reflect real-world co-morbidity. In patient-specific clinical contexts, transparent recommendations that allow for contraindications and other conflicts arising from co-morbidity are a requirement. In this work, we develop and evaluate a non-proprietary, standards-based approach to the deployment of computable guidelines with explainable argumentation, integrated with a commercial electronic health record (EHR) system in Serbia, a middle-income country in West Balkans.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used an ontological framework, the Transition-based Medical Recommendation (TMR) model, to represent, and reason about, guideline concepts, and chose the 2017 International global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guideline and a Serbian hospital as the deployment and evaluation site, respectively. To mitigate potential guideline conflicts, we used a TMR-based implementation of the Assumptions-Based Argumentation framework extended with preferences and Goals (ABA+G). Remote EHR integration of computable guidelines was via a microservice architecture based on HL7 FHIR and CDS Hooks. A prototype integration was developed to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with comorbid cardiovascular or chronic kidney diseases, and a mixed-methods evaluation was conducted with 20 simulated cases and five pulmonologists.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pulmonologists agreed 97% of the time with the GOLD-based COPD symptom severity assessment assigned to each patient by the CDSS, and 98% of the time with one of the proposed COPD care plans. Comments were favourable on the principles of explainable argumentation; inclusion of additional co-morbidities was suggested in the future along with customisation of the level of explanation with expertise.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>An ontological model provided a flexible means of providing argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence for a long-term condition. Extension to other guidelines and multiple co-morbidities is needed to test the approach further.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10391\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 整合临床指南的临床决策支持系统(CDS)需要反映现实世界中的共病情况。在针对特定患者的临床环境中,必须提供透明的建议,以考虑到禁忌症和其他因并发症而产生的冲突。在这项工作中,我们开发并评估了一种非专有的、基于标准的方法,用于部署具有可解释论证的可计算指南,并与塞尔维亚(西巴尔干半岛的一个中等收入国家)的商用电子健康记录(EHR)系统集成。 方法 我们使用本体论框架--基于转换的医疗建议(TMR)模型--来表示指南概念并对其进行推理,并选择 2017 年国际慢性阻塞性肺病全球倡议(GOLD)指南和一家塞尔维亚医院分别作为部署和评估地点。为了缓解潜在的指南冲突,我们使用了基于假设的论证框架(ABA+G)的 TMR 实现。可计算指南的远程 EHR 集成是通过基于 HL7 FHIR 和 CDS Hooks 的微服务架构实现的。开发了一个集成原型,用于管理合并心血管疾病或慢性肾脏疾病的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD),并对 20 个模拟病例和 5 位肺病专家进行了混合方法评估。 结果 97% 的肺科医生同意 CDSS 为每位患者指定的基于 GOLD 的慢性阻塞性肺病症状严重程度评估,98% 的肺科医生同意建议的慢性阻塞性肺病护理计划之一。对可解释论证原则的评论是积极的;建议今后纳入更多并发症,并根据专业知识定制解释程度。 结论 本体论模型为长期病症提供了灵活的论证方法和可解释的人工智能。需要将其推广到其他指南和多种并发症中,以进一步测试这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ROAD2H: Development and evaluation of an open-source explainable artificial intelligence approach for managing co-morbidity and clinical guidelines

Introduction

Clinical decision support (CDS) systems (CDSSs) that integrate clinical guidelines need to reflect real-world co-morbidity. In patient-specific clinical contexts, transparent recommendations that allow for contraindications and other conflicts arising from co-morbidity are a requirement. In this work, we develop and evaluate a non-proprietary, standards-based approach to the deployment of computable guidelines with explainable argumentation, integrated with a commercial electronic health record (EHR) system in Serbia, a middle-income country in West Balkans.

Methods

We used an ontological framework, the Transition-based Medical Recommendation (TMR) model, to represent, and reason about, guideline concepts, and chose the 2017 International global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guideline and a Serbian hospital as the deployment and evaluation site, respectively. To mitigate potential guideline conflicts, we used a TMR-based implementation of the Assumptions-Based Argumentation framework extended with preferences and Goals (ABA+G). Remote EHR integration of computable guidelines was via a microservice architecture based on HL7 FHIR and CDS Hooks. A prototype integration was developed to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with comorbid cardiovascular or chronic kidney diseases, and a mixed-methods evaluation was conducted with 20 simulated cases and five pulmonologists.

Results

Pulmonologists agreed 97% of the time with the GOLD-based COPD symptom severity assessment assigned to each patient by the CDSS, and 98% of the time with one of the proposed COPD care plans. Comments were favourable on the principles of explainable argumentation; inclusion of additional co-morbidities was suggested in the future along with customisation of the level of explanation with expertise.

Conclusion

An ontological model provided a flexible means of providing argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence for a long-term condition. Extension to other guidelines and multiple co-morbidities is needed to test the approach further.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Envisioning public health as a learning health system Thanks to our peer reviewers Learning health systems to implement chronic disease prevention programs: A novel framework and perspectives from an Australian health service The translation-to-policy learning cycle to improve public health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1