印尼成文法视角下的NFT版权转让

Maya Ruhtiani
{"title":"印尼成文法视角下的NFT版权转让","authors":"Maya Ruhtiani","doi":"10.30742/perspektif.v28i1.845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of NFT use does not function for the public’s need of objects related to copyright. In general, when someone creating NFT using another person’s work needs approval from the copyright owner. This type of normative juridical research is used as an assessment of the application of positive legal norms or legal rules applied in Indonesia. The results of research on Transferring Copyright Ownership Of NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) On The Perspective Of Positive Law In Indonesia can be regulated by using the provisions of Article 18 UUHC related to selling-buying outright of copyrighted works which in practice must meet the requirements stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code concerning the conditions for the validity of the agreement which are the existence of an agreement, parties’ requirement, particular objects, and lawful cause. The transaction of copyrighted works on NFT is not merely a sale and purchase for ordinary works of art, but also includes the rights to a copyrighted work protected by positive law in Indonesia. NFTs are protected under copyright laws and therefore have 2 (two) rights attached: economic and moral. In this regard, changing or distributing as well as modifying actions is included in violating moral rights. Even though the ownership has been transferred, the copyright holder must still be entitled to the economic and moral rights of the creator attached to the NFT.","PeriodicalId":20002,"journal":{"name":"Perspektif","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TRANSFERRING COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP OF NFT ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF POSITIVE LAW IN INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"Maya Ruhtiani\",\"doi\":\"10.30742/perspektif.v28i1.845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of NFT use does not function for the public’s need of objects related to copyright. In general, when someone creating NFT using another person’s work needs approval from the copyright owner. This type of normative juridical research is used as an assessment of the application of positive legal norms or legal rules applied in Indonesia. The results of research on Transferring Copyright Ownership Of NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) On The Perspective Of Positive Law In Indonesia can be regulated by using the provisions of Article 18 UUHC related to selling-buying outright of copyrighted works which in practice must meet the requirements stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code concerning the conditions for the validity of the agreement which are the existence of an agreement, parties’ requirement, particular objects, and lawful cause. The transaction of copyrighted works on NFT is not merely a sale and purchase for ordinary works of art, but also includes the rights to a copyrighted work protected by positive law in Indonesia. NFTs are protected under copyright laws and therefore have 2 (two) rights attached: economic and moral. In this regard, changing or distributing as well as modifying actions is included in violating moral rights. Even though the ownership has been transferred, the copyright holder must still be entitled to the economic and moral rights of the creator attached to the NFT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspektif\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspektif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v28i1.845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspektif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v28i1.845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

NFT使用的发展并不能满足公众对版权相关物品的需求。一般来说,当某人使用他人的作品创建NFT时,需要获得版权所有者的批准。这种类型的规范性法律研究被用来评估印度尼西亚适用的积极法律规范或法律规则的适用情况。印度尼西亚成文法视角下对NFT(不可替代代币)版权所有权转让的研究结果可以通过使用uhc第18条有关版权作品直接买卖的规定来规范,这些规定在实践中必须满足民法典第1320条关于协议有效性条件的要求,这些条件是协议的存在、各方的要求、特定对象和合法原因。在印尼,NFT上版权作品的交易不仅仅是普通艺术品的买卖,还包括对受成文法保护的版权作品的权利。nft受版权法保护,因此附带两项权利:经济权利和道德权利。在这方面,改变或分发以及修改行为都包括在侵犯精神权利的范围内。即使所有权已经转移,版权所有者必须仍然有权享有附属于NFT的创作者的经济和精神权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TRANSFERRING COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP OF NFT ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF POSITIVE LAW IN INDONESIA
The development of NFT use does not function for the public’s need of objects related to copyright. In general, when someone creating NFT using another person’s work needs approval from the copyright owner. This type of normative juridical research is used as an assessment of the application of positive legal norms or legal rules applied in Indonesia. The results of research on Transferring Copyright Ownership Of NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) On The Perspective Of Positive Law In Indonesia can be regulated by using the provisions of Article 18 UUHC related to selling-buying outright of copyrighted works which in practice must meet the requirements stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code concerning the conditions for the validity of the agreement which are the existence of an agreement, parties’ requirement, particular objects, and lawful cause. The transaction of copyrighted works on NFT is not merely a sale and purchase for ordinary works of art, but also includes the rights to a copyrighted work protected by positive law in Indonesia. NFTs are protected under copyright laws and therefore have 2 (two) rights attached: economic and moral. In this regard, changing or distributing as well as modifying actions is included in violating moral rights. Even though the ownership has been transferred, the copyright holder must still be entitled to the economic and moral rights of the creator attached to the NFT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beriman di Tengah Sawit Agama sebagai Religiositas Masyarakat dalam Dunia Kehidupan Modern Memahami Kebahagiaan Hidup Perkawinan dalam Terang Etika Eudaimonia Aristoteles dan Korelasinya dengan Pandangan Gereja Katolik Memandang Eksistensi Pasukan Merah Dayak dalam Terang Iman Katolik Filosofi Mangalap Tondi Pada Budaya Batak Toba dalam Kaitannya dengan Model Antropologis Stephen Bevans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1