考虑几何非线性和材料各向异性的薄硅模环球试验中双向弯曲强度的修正因素

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS Journal of Mechanics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jom/ufad026
M Y Tsai, P J Hsieh, T C Kuo
{"title":"考虑几何非线性和材料各向异性的薄硅模环球试验中双向弯曲强度的修正因素","authors":"M Y Tsai, P J Hsieh, T C Kuo","doi":"10.1093/jom/ufad026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The ball-on-ring test (BoR) is one of the standard tests for biaxial bending, suggested in ASTM F394-78. This test has been applied to determine the biaxial bending strength of silicon dies to avoid the die edge effect of the three-point bending tests. However, from the literature, when the relatively thin silicon dies are tested, this test suffers from a contact-nonlinearity effect, due to a maximum applied stress moving away from the loading pin center before the specimen failure, and thus results in overestimated maximum stress calculated by the theoretical linear solution. This study aims to investigate this mechanical issue experimentally, theoretically and numerically by taking into account the specimen material anisotropy and thickness effects on the maximum stresses and deflections, and then propose new correction factor equations to the theoretical linear solutions, based on the numerical fitting results of the geometric nonlinear finite element solutions. Those correction factor equations proposed in this study are material-property independent, but specimen thickness dependent, which can be estimated by an interpolation function. It has been proved that the BoR test using the conventional theory associated with the proposed correction factor equations can successfully determine the bending strength of the thin silicon dies on untreated surfaces, which mostly fails in the contact-nonlinear region.","PeriodicalId":50136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction Factors to Biaxial Bending Strength of Thin Silicon Die in the Ball-on-Ring Test by Considering Geometric Nonlinearity and Material Anisotropy\",\"authors\":\"M Y Tsai, P J Hsieh, T C Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jom/ufad026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The ball-on-ring test (BoR) is one of the standard tests for biaxial bending, suggested in ASTM F394-78. This test has been applied to determine the biaxial bending strength of silicon dies to avoid the die edge effect of the three-point bending tests. However, from the literature, when the relatively thin silicon dies are tested, this test suffers from a contact-nonlinearity effect, due to a maximum applied stress moving away from the loading pin center before the specimen failure, and thus results in overestimated maximum stress calculated by the theoretical linear solution. This study aims to investigate this mechanical issue experimentally, theoretically and numerically by taking into account the specimen material anisotropy and thickness effects on the maximum stresses and deflections, and then propose new correction factor equations to the theoretical linear solutions, based on the numerical fitting results of the geometric nonlinear finite element solutions. Those correction factor equations proposed in this study are material-property independent, but specimen thickness dependent, which can be estimated by an interpolation function. It has been proved that the BoR test using the conventional theory associated with the proposed correction factor equations can successfully determine the bending strength of the thin silicon dies on untreated surfaces, which mostly fails in the contact-nonlinear region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jom/ufad026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jom/ufad026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:球环试验(BoR)是ASTM F394-78中提出的双轴弯曲试验标准之一。为了避免三点弯曲试验的模具边缘效应,应用该试验确定了硅模具的双轴弯曲强度。然而,从文献来看,当测试相对较薄的硅模具时,由于试样破坏前最大施加应力远离加载销中心,该测试受到接触非线性效应的影响,从而导致理论线性解计算的最大应力高估。本研究将考虑试件材料各向异性和厚度对最大应力和挠度的影响,从实验、理论和数值上探讨这一力学问题,并基于几何非线性有限元解的数值拟合结果,提出新的理论线性解的修正因子方程。本研究提出的修正因子方程与材料特性无关,但与试件厚度有关,可以通过插值函数估计。结果表明,采用常规理论和修正系数方程进行的BoR试验可以成功地确定未经处理表面上硅薄模具的弯曲强度,而这种测试大多在接触非线性区域失效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correction Factors to Biaxial Bending Strength of Thin Silicon Die in the Ball-on-Ring Test by Considering Geometric Nonlinearity and Material Anisotropy
Abstract The ball-on-ring test (BoR) is one of the standard tests for biaxial bending, suggested in ASTM F394-78. This test has been applied to determine the biaxial bending strength of silicon dies to avoid the die edge effect of the three-point bending tests. However, from the literature, when the relatively thin silicon dies are tested, this test suffers from a contact-nonlinearity effect, due to a maximum applied stress moving away from the loading pin center before the specimen failure, and thus results in overestimated maximum stress calculated by the theoretical linear solution. This study aims to investigate this mechanical issue experimentally, theoretically and numerically by taking into account the specimen material anisotropy and thickness effects on the maximum stresses and deflections, and then propose new correction factor equations to the theoretical linear solutions, based on the numerical fitting results of the geometric nonlinear finite element solutions. Those correction factor equations proposed in this study are material-property independent, but specimen thickness dependent, which can be estimated by an interpolation function. It has been proved that the BoR test using the conventional theory associated with the proposed correction factor equations can successfully determine the bending strength of the thin silicon dies on untreated surfaces, which mostly fails in the contact-nonlinear region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mechanics
Journal of Mechanics 物理-力学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
20
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Mechanics is to provide an international forum to foster exchange of ideas among mechanics communities in different parts of world. The Journal of Mechanics publishes original research in all fields of theoretical and applied mechanics. The Journal especially welcomes papers that are related to recent technological advances. The contributions, which may be analytical, experimental or numerical, should be of significance to the progress of mechanics. Papers which are merely illustrations of established principles and procedures will generally not be accepted. Reports that are of technical interest are published as short articles. Review articles are published only by invitation.
期刊最新文献
Auxetic metamaterial inspired by the seesaw motion Damage Creep Model and Application for Sandy Mudstone Considering the Effect of Immersion Deterioration Numerical Study of Motorbike Aerodynamic Wing Kit Power-law fluid annular flows between concentric rotating spheres subject to hydrodynamic slip Numerical Prediction of the Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics of a 25 kW Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1