使用层次分析法评估移动即服务(MaaS)应用

IF 4.6 3区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Journal of Urban Technology Pub Date : 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1080/10630732.2023.2253421
Aldiyar Belossarov, Attila Aba, Domokos Esztergár-Kiss
{"title":"使用层次分析法评估移动即服务(MaaS)应用","authors":"Aldiyar Belossarov, Attila Aba, Domokos Esztergár-Kiss","doi":"10.1080/10630732.2023.2253421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe Mobility as a Service (MaaS) concept is widely discussed, but only a small number of publications consider real-world solutions and a quantified evaluation of travel-related applications. Therefore, this article aims to evaluate and rank existing MaaS services to support the development of future MaaS applications by highlighting the most relevant features. Thus, a framework of the technical aspects is created, where the aspects are categorized into routing, booking, payment, ticketing, and supplementary services. Based on the defined aspects and their sub-aspects, an evaluation of selected applications is performed in three stages by applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. In the first stage, the assessment of the examined MaaS services is carried out by using a multi-criteria analysis (i.e., scoring). In the second stage, the relative importance of the aspects is weighted (i.e., weighting). The third stage is based on the ranking of MaaS services by taking the weights of the aspects into account. According to the achieved scores, the analyzed MaaS services earn only 44 percent of their potential maximum value, and the payment is the most important among the technical aspects. The applied method reveals quantified results, which provides valuable guidelines for future implementations, especially for application developers.KEYWORDS: Mobility as a Service (MaaS)MaaS featuresAnalytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)application rankingmulti-criteria analysis AcknowledgmentProject no. TKP2021-NVA-02 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-NVA funding scheme.Declaration of InterestThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAldiyar BelossarovAldiyar Belossarov is an MSc student in the Department of Transport Technology and Economics at Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME).Attila AbaAttila Aba is an assistant research fellow in the Department of Transport Technology and Economics in the Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering at Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME).Domokos Esztergár-KissDomokos Esztergár-Kiss is a senior lecturer in the Department of Transport Technology and Economics in the Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering at Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME).","PeriodicalId":47593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Evaluate Mobility as a Service ( <i>MaaS</i> ) Applications\",\"authors\":\"Aldiyar Belossarov, Attila Aba, Domokos Esztergár-Kiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10630732.2023.2253421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe Mobility as a Service (MaaS) concept is widely discussed, but only a small number of publications consider real-world solutions and a quantified evaluation of travel-related applications. Therefore, this article aims to evaluate and rank existing MaaS services to support the development of future MaaS applications by highlighting the most relevant features. Thus, a framework of the technical aspects is created, where the aspects are categorized into routing, booking, payment, ticketing, and supplementary services. Based on the defined aspects and their sub-aspects, an evaluation of selected applications is performed in three stages by applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. In the first stage, the assessment of the examined MaaS services is carried out by using a multi-criteria analysis (i.e., scoring). In the second stage, the relative importance of the aspects is weighted (i.e., weighting). The third stage is based on the ranking of MaaS services by taking the weights of the aspects into account. According to the achieved scores, the analyzed MaaS services earn only 44 percent of their potential maximum value, and the payment is the most important among the technical aspects. The applied method reveals quantified results, which provides valuable guidelines for future implementations, especially for application developers.KEYWORDS: Mobility as a Service (MaaS)MaaS featuresAnalytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)application rankingmulti-criteria analysis AcknowledgmentProject no. TKP2021-NVA-02 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-NVA funding scheme.Declaration of InterestThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAldiyar BelossarovAldiyar Belossarov is an MSc student in the Department of Transport Technology and Economics at Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME).Attila AbaAttila Aba is an assistant research fellow in the Department of Transport Technology and Economics in the Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering at Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME).Domokos Esztergár-KissDomokos Esztergár-Kiss is a senior lecturer in the Department of Transport Technology and Economics in the Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering at Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2023.2253421\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2023.2253421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要移动即服务(MaaS)的概念被广泛讨论,但只有少数出版物考虑了现实世界的解决方案和对旅行相关应用的量化评估。因此,本文旨在通过突出显示最相关的功能,对现有MaaS服务进行评估和排序,以支持未来MaaS应用程序的开发。因此,创建了一个技术方面的框架,其中的方面被分类为路由、预订、支付、票务和补充服务。在已定义的方面及其子方面的基础上,采用层次分析法(AHP)分三个阶段对选定的应用程序进行评价。在第一阶段,通过使用多标准分析(即评分)对检查的MaaS服务进行评估。在第二阶段,对各方面的相对重要性进行加权(即加权)。第三阶段是通过考虑各方面的权重对MaaS服务进行排名。根据获得的分数,分析的MaaS服务仅获得其潜在最大价值的44%,而支付是技术方面最重要的。应用的方法揭示了量化的结果,这为未来的实现提供了有价值的指导方针,特别是对于应用程序开发人员。关键词:移动即服务(MaaS)MaaS特性;层次分析法(AHP);应用排序;TKP2021-NVA-02在匈牙利文化和创新部的国家研究、发展和创新基金的支持下实施,该基金由TKP2021-NVA资助计划资助。利益声明作者报告说,没有竞争利益需要申报。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者简介:valdiyar Belossarov是布达佩斯科技经济大学(BME)交通技术与经济系的一名硕士学生。阿提拉·阿巴,布达佩斯科技经济大学交通运输工程与车辆工程学院交通技术与经济学系助理研究员。Domokos Esztergár-KissDomokos Esztergár-Kiss是布达佩斯科技经济大学交通运输工程与车辆工程学院交通技术与经济系的高级讲师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Evaluate Mobility as a Service ( MaaS ) Applications
ABSTRACTThe Mobility as a Service (MaaS) concept is widely discussed, but only a small number of publications consider real-world solutions and a quantified evaluation of travel-related applications. Therefore, this article aims to evaluate and rank existing MaaS services to support the development of future MaaS applications by highlighting the most relevant features. Thus, a framework of the technical aspects is created, where the aspects are categorized into routing, booking, payment, ticketing, and supplementary services. Based on the defined aspects and their sub-aspects, an evaluation of selected applications is performed in three stages by applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. In the first stage, the assessment of the examined MaaS services is carried out by using a multi-criteria analysis (i.e., scoring). In the second stage, the relative importance of the aspects is weighted (i.e., weighting). The third stage is based on the ranking of MaaS services by taking the weights of the aspects into account. According to the achieved scores, the analyzed MaaS services earn only 44 percent of their potential maximum value, and the payment is the most important among the technical aspects. The applied method reveals quantified results, which provides valuable guidelines for future implementations, especially for application developers.KEYWORDS: Mobility as a Service (MaaS)MaaS featuresAnalytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)application rankingmulti-criteria analysis AcknowledgmentProject no. TKP2021-NVA-02 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-NVA funding scheme.Declaration of InterestThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAldiyar BelossarovAldiyar Belossarov is an MSc student in the Department of Transport Technology and Economics at Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME).Attila AbaAttila Aba is an assistant research fellow in the Department of Transport Technology and Economics in the Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering at Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME).Domokos Esztergár-KissDomokos Esztergár-Kiss is a senior lecturer in the Department of Transport Technology and Economics in the Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering at Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Technology publishes articles that review and analyze developments in urban technologies as well as articles that study the history and the political, economic, environmental, social, esthetic, and ethical effects of those technologies. The goal of the journal is, through education and discussion, to maximize the positive and minimize the adverse effects of technology on cities. The journal"s mission is to open a conversation between specialists and non-specialists (or among practitioners of different specialities) and is designed for both scholars and a general audience whose businesses, occupations, professions, or studies require that they become aware of the effects of new technologies on urban environments.
期刊最新文献
Tweeting during the Pandemic in New York City: Unveiling the Evolving Sentiment Landscape of NYC through a Spatiotemporal Analysis of Geolocated Tweets Can Smart Cities Be Sustainable? An Emerging Field of Research Informational Modeling of Cities: Method and Challenges for Institutional Implementation Investigating Digitally Inflected Intercity Cycle Commuting The Role of Digital Management and Smart Technologies for Sports Education in a Dynamic Environment: Employment, Green Growth, and Tourism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1