不同代理水平学生的自我提升策略

Vladimir Georgievich Maralov, Vyacheslav Alekseevich Sitarov, Adlet Dyusembaevich Kariyev, Olga Valerievna Krezhevskikh, Marina Aleksandrovna Kudaka, Larissa Yevgenievna Ageyeva, Yelena Nikolayevna Agranovich
{"title":"不同代理水平学生的自我提升策略","authors":"Vladimir Georgievich Maralov, Vyacheslav Alekseevich Sitarov, Adlet Dyusembaevich Kariyev, Olga Valerievna Krezhevskikh, Marina Aleksandrovna Kudaka, Larissa Yevgenievna Ageyeva, Yelena Nikolayevna Agranovich","doi":"10.51847/4cityrcqsn","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the issue is due to the importance of studying the psychological mechanisms and factors of personal self-development. The goal of this research was to identify factors of students' choice of self-improvement strategies: acquisition, rejection, transformation, and restriction, dep ending on the students’ agency levels. Our study involved students from several universities in Russia and Kazakhstan, with a total of 271 people aged 17 to 27, mostly female, with an average age of 19.5 (SD=1.5) years. As diagnostic tools, we developed an original technique, \"Square of self-improvement\" and also used M.A. Shchukina’s questionnaire, “Level of personal autonomy development.” The processing was performed with the φ* criterion (Fisher's angular transformation). As a result, it was found that s tudents with high levels of agency prefer three strategies: acquisition, disposal, and transformation. Among students with low levels of agency, fewer participants choose the \"transformation\" strategy, whereas the number of students who prefer \"acquisition\" increases. The process depends on intrinsic value as an indicator of the agency. We have found that manifestations of the \"acquisition\" strategy vary between students with higher and lower agency levels, and these are qualitative differences. The study led us to the conclusion that the choice of self-improvement strategies is largely determined by the person’s level of agency, i.e., their capability to be the masters and shapers of their lives and their self-development. The results obtained can be used in professional training (to plan trajectories of individual self-development) and in psychological consultancy at universities.","PeriodicalId":53845,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Organizational Behavior Research","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies of Self-Improvement for Students with Different Agency Levels\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Georgievich Maralov, Vyacheslav Alekseevich Sitarov, Adlet Dyusembaevich Kariyev, Olga Valerievna Krezhevskikh, Marina Aleksandrovna Kudaka, Larissa Yevgenievna Ageyeva, Yelena Nikolayevna Agranovich\",\"doi\":\"10.51847/4cityrcqsn\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relevance of the issue is due to the importance of studying the psychological mechanisms and factors of personal self-development. The goal of this research was to identify factors of students' choice of self-improvement strategies: acquisition, rejection, transformation, and restriction, dep ending on the students’ agency levels. Our study involved students from several universities in Russia and Kazakhstan, with a total of 271 people aged 17 to 27, mostly female, with an average age of 19.5 (SD=1.5) years. As diagnostic tools, we developed an original technique, \\\"Square of self-improvement\\\" and also used M.A. Shchukina’s questionnaire, “Level of personal autonomy development.” The processing was performed with the φ* criterion (Fisher's angular transformation). As a result, it was found that s tudents with high levels of agency prefer three strategies: acquisition, disposal, and transformation. Among students with low levels of agency, fewer participants choose the \\\"transformation\\\" strategy, whereas the number of students who prefer \\\"acquisition\\\" increases. The process depends on intrinsic value as an indicator of the agency. We have found that manifestations of the \\\"acquisition\\\" strategy vary between students with higher and lower agency levels, and these are qualitative differences. The study led us to the conclusion that the choice of self-improvement strategies is largely determined by the person’s level of agency, i.e., their capability to be the masters and shapers of their lives and their self-development. The results obtained can be used in professional training (to plan trajectories of individual self-development) and in psychological consultancy at universities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Of Organizational Behavior Research\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Of Organizational Behavior Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51847/4cityrcqsn\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Organizational Behavior Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51847/4cityrcqsn","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategies of Self-Improvement for Students with Different Agency Levels
The relevance of the issue is due to the importance of studying the psychological mechanisms and factors of personal self-development. The goal of this research was to identify factors of students' choice of self-improvement strategies: acquisition, rejection, transformation, and restriction, dep ending on the students’ agency levels. Our study involved students from several universities in Russia and Kazakhstan, with a total of 271 people aged 17 to 27, mostly female, with an average age of 19.5 (SD=1.5) years. As diagnostic tools, we developed an original technique, "Square of self-improvement" and also used M.A. Shchukina’s questionnaire, “Level of personal autonomy development.” The processing was performed with the φ* criterion (Fisher's angular transformation). As a result, it was found that s tudents with high levels of agency prefer three strategies: acquisition, disposal, and transformation. Among students with low levels of agency, fewer participants choose the "transformation" strategy, whereas the number of students who prefer "acquisition" increases. The process depends on intrinsic value as an indicator of the agency. We have found that manifestations of the "acquisition" strategy vary between students with higher and lower agency levels, and these are qualitative differences. The study led us to the conclusion that the choice of self-improvement strategies is largely determined by the person’s level of agency, i.e., their capability to be the masters and shapers of their lives and their self-development. The results obtained can be used in professional training (to plan trajectories of individual self-development) and in psychological consultancy at universities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Technology, Artificial Intelligence, and Robotics in Future Wars Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Employee's Commitment: An E m p i rical Research in Viet Nam Joint-Stock Commercial Banks The Effect of Political Connection on The Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises The Influence of Personal Resources on Job Engagement of Employees in Tourism Companies Empirical Study on Gamification Effect on Brand Engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1