动态中风患者的体力活动时间及其基于步态速度的比较-一项初步研究

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Indian Journal of Medical Specialities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/injms.injms_28_23
Mansi Soni, Balaganapathy Muruganantham
{"title":"动态中风患者的体力活动时间及其基于步态速度的比较-一项初步研究","authors":"Mansi Soni, Balaganapathy Muruganantham","doi":"10.4103/injms.injms_28_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Physical activity is proven to have beneficial effects in the prevention and management of stroke. This makes it an important modifiable risk factor Stroke is a condition resulting in various functional deficits. The higher functional ability of stroke patients may result in their higher physical activity. Gait speed is a functional parameter to differentiate between the ability of mobility of patients with stroke. However, if it is reflected in the time spent in an activity needs to be explored. Objectives: This pilot study attempts to explore time spent in PA by ambulatory stroke patients and compare time spent in different activity levels based on gait speed. Subjects and Methods: This pilot study recruited 26 ambulatory patients with stroke after obtaining informed consent. Their PA was recorded with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT for 1 day. Differences in time spent in the different level of PA were compared between people with gait speed ≤0.49 m/s and >0.49 m/s. Results: The result of the study shows that patients with stroke having gait speed ≤0.49 m/s had higher time spent in sedentary (686.02 ± 80.35 min/day) and light activity (612 ± 69.84 min/day) as compared to those with >0.49 m/s (646.42 ± 137.52 min/day and 593.57 ± 119.95 min/day, respectively). While time spent in moderate activity was higher in patients with stroke having gait speed >0.49 m/s (199.73 ± 111.17 min/day) as compared to those whose gait speed was ≤0.49 m/s (141.84 ± 76.75 min/day). However, this difference failed to demonstrate statistical significance. Conclusion: Patients with stroke were less physically active as compared to recommendations. Gait speed-based comparison demonstrates a nonsignificant difference between both groups. This suggests that factors other than gait speed may contribute to ambulatory stroke patients’ time spent in PA.","PeriodicalId":43811,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Specialities","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time spent in physical activity by ambulatory stroke patients and its comparison based on gait speed – A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Mansi Soni, Balaganapathy Muruganantham\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/injms.injms_28_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Physical activity is proven to have beneficial effects in the prevention and management of stroke. This makes it an important modifiable risk factor Stroke is a condition resulting in various functional deficits. The higher functional ability of stroke patients may result in their higher physical activity. Gait speed is a functional parameter to differentiate between the ability of mobility of patients with stroke. However, if it is reflected in the time spent in an activity needs to be explored. Objectives: This pilot study attempts to explore time spent in PA by ambulatory stroke patients and compare time spent in different activity levels based on gait speed. Subjects and Methods: This pilot study recruited 26 ambulatory patients with stroke after obtaining informed consent. Their PA was recorded with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT for 1 day. Differences in time spent in the different level of PA were compared between people with gait speed ≤0.49 m/s and >0.49 m/s. Results: The result of the study shows that patients with stroke having gait speed ≤0.49 m/s had higher time spent in sedentary (686.02 ± 80.35 min/day) and light activity (612 ± 69.84 min/day) as compared to those with >0.49 m/s (646.42 ± 137.52 min/day and 593.57 ± 119.95 min/day, respectively). While time spent in moderate activity was higher in patients with stroke having gait speed >0.49 m/s (199.73 ± 111.17 min/day) as compared to those whose gait speed was ≤0.49 m/s (141.84 ± 76.75 min/day). However, this difference failed to demonstrate statistical significance. Conclusion: Patients with stroke were less physically active as compared to recommendations. Gait speed-based comparison demonstrates a nonsignificant difference between both groups. This suggests that factors other than gait speed may contribute to ambulatory stroke patients’ time spent in PA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Specialities\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Specialities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/injms.injms_28_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Specialities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/injms.injms_28_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

身体活动已被证明对中风的预防和管理有有益的作用。这使得它成为一个重要的可改变的危险因素中风是一种导致各种功能缺陷的疾病。脑卒中患者较高的功能能力可能导致其较高的体力活动。步态速度是区分脑卒中患者活动能力的功能参数。但是,如果它反映在活动中所花费的时间上,则需要进行探索。目的:本初步研究旨在探讨门诊脑卒中患者在PA中花费的时间,并比较基于步态速度的不同活动水平所花费的时间。研究对象和方法:本初步研究在获得知情同意后招募了26例卒中门诊患者。用ActiGraph wGT3X-BT记录PA 1天。比较步态速度≤0.49 m/s和>0.49 m/s两组在不同PA水平上花费的时间差异。结果:研究结果表明,步速≤0.49 m/s的脑卒中患者久坐时间(686.02±80.35 min/day)和轻度活动时间(612±69.84 min/day)均高于步速>0.49 m/s的患者(646.42±137.52 min/day和593.57±119.95 min/day)。步态速度>0.49 m/s(199.73±111.17 min/day)的脑卒中患者中度活动时间高于步态速度≤0.49 m/s(141.84±76.75 min/day)的脑卒中患者。然而,这种差异没有表现出统计学意义。结论:与建议相比,卒中患者的体力活动较少。基于步态速度的比较显示两组之间无显著差异。这表明,除了步态速度之外,其他因素可能会影响中风患者在门诊住院的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time spent in physical activity by ambulatory stroke patients and its comparison based on gait speed – A pilot study
Introduction: Physical activity is proven to have beneficial effects in the prevention and management of stroke. This makes it an important modifiable risk factor Stroke is a condition resulting in various functional deficits. The higher functional ability of stroke patients may result in their higher physical activity. Gait speed is a functional parameter to differentiate between the ability of mobility of patients with stroke. However, if it is reflected in the time spent in an activity needs to be explored. Objectives: This pilot study attempts to explore time spent in PA by ambulatory stroke patients and compare time spent in different activity levels based on gait speed. Subjects and Methods: This pilot study recruited 26 ambulatory patients with stroke after obtaining informed consent. Their PA was recorded with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT for 1 day. Differences in time spent in the different level of PA were compared between people with gait speed ≤0.49 m/s and >0.49 m/s. Results: The result of the study shows that patients with stroke having gait speed ≤0.49 m/s had higher time spent in sedentary (686.02 ± 80.35 min/day) and light activity (612 ± 69.84 min/day) as compared to those with >0.49 m/s (646.42 ± 137.52 min/day and 593.57 ± 119.95 min/day, respectively). While time spent in moderate activity was higher in patients with stroke having gait speed >0.49 m/s (199.73 ± 111.17 min/day) as compared to those whose gait speed was ≤0.49 m/s (141.84 ± 76.75 min/day). However, this difference failed to demonstrate statistical significance. Conclusion: Patients with stroke were less physically active as compared to recommendations. Gait speed-based comparison demonstrates a nonsignificant difference between both groups. This suggests that factors other than gait speed may contribute to ambulatory stroke patients’ time spent in PA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Medical Specialities
Indian Journal of Medical Specialities MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Specialities is an all-encompassing peer-reviewed quarterly journal. The journal publishes scholarly articles, reviews, case reports and original research papers from medical specialities specially pertaining to clinical patterns and epidemiological profile of diseases. An important highlight is the emphasis on undergraduate and postgraduate medical education including various aspects of scientific paper-writing. The journal gives priority to research originating from the developing world, including from the tropical regions of the world. The journal also publishes special issues on health topics of current interest. The Indian Journal of Medical Specialities is one of the very few quality multispeciality scientific medical journals.
期刊最新文献
Loss-to-follow-up rate among tuberculosis patients registered at two tuberculosis units of ballabgarh block of district Faridabad, Haryana: A desk review Sudden and unexpected seizure during emergency cesarean section in a nonhypertensive hypothyroid primigravida Systemic inflammation response index and systemic immune inflammation index for predicting acute cholecystitis Study of serum zinc level in liver cirrhosis and its correlation with stages of hepatic encephalopathy Lower gastrointestinal bleeding in children: Clinical profile and outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1