巩固关于社会媒体如何支持医疗保健提供者在临床实践中的知识使用的程序理论:一项现实主义者知情的定性研究

Junqiang Zhao, Gillian Harvey, Amanda Vandyk, Mandy Huang, Wendy Gifford
{"title":"巩固关于社会媒体如何支持医疗保健提供者在临床实践中的知识使用的程序理论:一项现实主义者知情的定性研究","authors":"Junqiang Zhao, Gillian Harvey, Amanda Vandyk, Mandy Huang, Wendy Gifford","doi":"10.1097/nr9.0000000000000038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: This study aimed to consolidate a program theory, developed from a previous realist review, to further understand how and under what circumstances social media supports healthcare providers’ knowledge use. Methods: A realist-informed qualitative study was conducted. We carried out in-depth interviews with 11 participants, including content developers and healthcare providers from China, Australia, and Canada. The data analysis was informed by categorizing and connecting strategies. Results: Ten context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOs) were developed to consolidate the program theory. Among these, four CMOs confirmed the original CMOs from the realist review, four refined the original ones, and two were new propositions. These 10 CMOs were situated within four interconnected levels of outcomes: social media product, access, engagement, and knowledge use. They considered 1) content developers’ capabilities and capacities, 2) healthcare providers’ increased attention, 3) fulfillment of information needs, 4) access to social influence and support, 5) perception of message value and implementability, 6) behaviour capabilities, self-efficacy, intention, and awareness; and 7) ability to exercise professional autonomy as the key mechanisms. We developed the consolidated program theory based on the 10 CMOs. Conclusions: Social media can promote knowledge use by healthcare providers. Future empirical studies drawing on the program theory need to be conducted to further optimize the theoretical understanding.","PeriodicalId":73407,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consolidating a program theory on how social media supports healthcare providers’ knowledge use in clinical practice: a realist-informed qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Junqiang Zhao, Gillian Harvey, Amanda Vandyk, Mandy Huang, Wendy Gifford\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/nr9.0000000000000038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: This study aimed to consolidate a program theory, developed from a previous realist review, to further understand how and under what circumstances social media supports healthcare providers’ knowledge use. Methods: A realist-informed qualitative study was conducted. We carried out in-depth interviews with 11 participants, including content developers and healthcare providers from China, Australia, and Canada. The data analysis was informed by categorizing and connecting strategies. Results: Ten context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOs) were developed to consolidate the program theory. Among these, four CMOs confirmed the original CMOs from the realist review, four refined the original ones, and two were new propositions. These 10 CMOs were situated within four interconnected levels of outcomes: social media product, access, engagement, and knowledge use. They considered 1) content developers’ capabilities and capacities, 2) healthcare providers’ increased attention, 3) fulfillment of information needs, 4) access to social influence and support, 5) perception of message value and implementability, 6) behaviour capabilities, self-efficacy, intention, and awareness; and 7) ability to exercise professional autonomy as the key mechanisms. We developed the consolidated program theory based on the 10 CMOs. Conclusions: Social media can promote knowledge use by healthcare providers. Future empirical studies drawing on the program theory need to be conducted to further optimize the theoretical understanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary nursing research\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary nursing research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/nr9.0000000000000038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/nr9.0000000000000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:本研究旨在巩固一个程序理论,从之前的现实主义回顾发展,以进一步了解社交媒体如何以及在什么情况下支持医疗保健提供者的知识使用。方法:采用现实知情的定性研究。我们对11名参与者进行了深入访谈,其中包括来自中国、澳大利亚和加拿大的内容开发商和医疗保健提供商。数据分析是通过分类和连接策略进行的。结果:建立了十个情境-机制-结果配置(cmo)来巩固程序理论。其中,4个cmo从现实主义的审视中确认了原来的cmo, 4个对原来的cmo进行了提炼,2个是新的命题。这10个cmo位于四个相互关联的结果层次:社交媒体产品、访问、参与和知识使用。他们考虑了1)内容开发者的能力和能力,2)医疗保健提供者的更多关注,3)满足信息需求,4)获得社会影响和支持,5)对信息价值和可实现性的感知,6)行为能力、自我效能、意图和意识;7)专业自主能力作为关键机制。我们发展了基于10个cmo的综合程序理论。结论:社交媒体可以促进医护人员的知识使用。未来的实证研究需要借鉴程序理论,进一步优化理论认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consolidating a program theory on how social media supports healthcare providers’ knowledge use in clinical practice: a realist-informed qualitative study
Abstract Objective: This study aimed to consolidate a program theory, developed from a previous realist review, to further understand how and under what circumstances social media supports healthcare providers’ knowledge use. Methods: A realist-informed qualitative study was conducted. We carried out in-depth interviews with 11 participants, including content developers and healthcare providers from China, Australia, and Canada. The data analysis was informed by categorizing and connecting strategies. Results: Ten context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOs) were developed to consolidate the program theory. Among these, four CMOs confirmed the original CMOs from the realist review, four refined the original ones, and two were new propositions. These 10 CMOs were situated within four interconnected levels of outcomes: social media product, access, engagement, and knowledge use. They considered 1) content developers’ capabilities and capacities, 2) healthcare providers’ increased attention, 3) fulfillment of information needs, 4) access to social influence and support, 5) perception of message value and implementability, 6) behaviour capabilities, self-efficacy, intention, and awareness; and 7) ability to exercise professional autonomy as the key mechanisms. We developed the consolidated program theory based on the 10 CMOs. Conclusions: Social media can promote knowledge use by healthcare providers. Future empirical studies drawing on the program theory need to be conducted to further optimize the theoretical understanding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interdisciplinary collaboration for chronic illness prevention and management through digital health interventions. Association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and neurodevelopmental outcomes among black and white preterm infants up to two years of age. Nurse-led self-management support to improve symptom management and self-reported outcomes in people with irritable bowel syndrome. Research of assisted housing design for the bedridden elderly and their family caregivers Digital twin prevalence in the medical caring fields: a bibliomatrics study and visualization analysis via CiteSpace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1