{"title":"当环保声明是空洞的承诺:洗绿如何影响企业声誉和信誉","authors":"Juliane Keilmann, Thomas Koch","doi":"10.1080/17524032.2023.2267782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article examines mechanisms and effects of greenwashing on corporate reputation and credibility. We define greenwashing as the perception of a discrepancy between what an organization claims to do in terms of protecting the environment and what the organization actually does in this respect. In two experiments, we vary a company’s promises of green engagement. Afterward, participants are confronted with the company’s actual green engagement. The studies show that if a company claims to be green, its reputation and credibility are assessed more positively. However, the experiments also demonstrate that false green promises backfire: If the green promises are not kept, participants assess the company’s reputation and credibility more negatively as opposed to a group that evaluates a company without any false promises. Furthermore, both experiments provide insight into the underlying mechanisms responsible for these effects: Participants’ expectations are violated which leads to a perception of greenwashing and, in turn, worsens the perception of the company’s reputation and credibility.KEYWORDS: Greenwashingcorporate social responsibilityreputationcredibilityexperiments Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":54205,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Environmental Claims are Empty Promises: How Greenwashing Affects Corporate Reputation and Credibility\",\"authors\":\"Juliane Keilmann, Thomas Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17524032.2023.2267782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis article examines mechanisms and effects of greenwashing on corporate reputation and credibility. We define greenwashing as the perception of a discrepancy between what an organization claims to do in terms of protecting the environment and what the organization actually does in this respect. In two experiments, we vary a company’s promises of green engagement. Afterward, participants are confronted with the company’s actual green engagement. The studies show that if a company claims to be green, its reputation and credibility are assessed more positively. However, the experiments also demonstrate that false green promises backfire: If the green promises are not kept, participants assess the company’s reputation and credibility more negatively as opposed to a group that evaluates a company without any false promises. Furthermore, both experiments provide insight into the underlying mechanisms responsible for these effects: Participants’ expectations are violated which leads to a perception of greenwashing and, in turn, worsens the perception of the company’s reputation and credibility.KEYWORDS: Greenwashingcorporate social responsibilityreputationcredibilityexperiments Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":54205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2267782\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2267782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
When Environmental Claims are Empty Promises: How Greenwashing Affects Corporate Reputation and Credibility
ABSTRACTThis article examines mechanisms and effects of greenwashing on corporate reputation and credibility. We define greenwashing as the perception of a discrepancy between what an organization claims to do in terms of protecting the environment and what the organization actually does in this respect. In two experiments, we vary a company’s promises of green engagement. Afterward, participants are confronted with the company’s actual green engagement. The studies show that if a company claims to be green, its reputation and credibility are assessed more positively. However, the experiments also demonstrate that false green promises backfire: If the green promises are not kept, participants assess the company’s reputation and credibility more negatively as opposed to a group that evaluates a company without any false promises. Furthermore, both experiments provide insight into the underlying mechanisms responsible for these effects: Participants’ expectations are violated which leads to a perception of greenwashing and, in turn, worsens the perception of the company’s reputation and credibility.KEYWORDS: Greenwashingcorporate social responsibilityreputationcredibilityexperiments Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
期刊介绍:
Environmental Communication is an international, peer-reviewed forum for multidisciplinary research and analysis assessing the many intersections among communication, media, society, and environmental issues. These include but are not limited to debates over climate change, natural resources, sustainability, conservation, wildlife, ecosystems, water, environmental health, food and agriculture, energy, and emerging technologies. Submissions should contribute to our understanding of scientific controversies, political developments, policy solutions, institutional change, cultural trends, media portrayals, public opinion and participation, and/or professional decisions. Articles often seek to bridge gaps between theory and practice, and are written in a style that is broadly accessible and engaging.