自我保护与实用的自动驾驶汽车

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Informacios Tarsadalom Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.22503/inftars.xxiii.2023.2.5
Beáta Laki
{"title":"自我保护与实用的自动驾驶汽车","authors":"Beáta Laki","doi":"10.22503/inftars.xxiii.2023.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following examination focuses on the moral dilemmas surrounding the comparison of self-protective and utilitarian autonomous vehicles. These vehicles can be programmed to prioritize the safety of passengers in an accident or prioritize the greater good to save more lives. The essay will explore various ethical questions such as evaluating the numbers game approach, analyzing the principles of beneficence correlated with social inequality, and interpreting the principle of autonomy in the context of autonomous vehicles. Additionally, the examination will consider the harm–benefit ratio. In the sense of methods, this analysis uses the classical issues in a new way and provides recommendations for decision-makers to consider.","PeriodicalId":41114,"journal":{"name":"Informacios Tarsadalom","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-protective versus utilitarian autonomous vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Beáta Laki\",\"doi\":\"10.22503/inftars.xxiii.2023.2.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following examination focuses on the moral dilemmas surrounding the comparison of self-protective and utilitarian autonomous vehicles. These vehicles can be programmed to prioritize the safety of passengers in an accident or prioritize the greater good to save more lives. The essay will explore various ethical questions such as evaluating the numbers game approach, analyzing the principles of beneficence correlated with social inequality, and interpreting the principle of autonomy in the context of autonomous vehicles. Additionally, the examination will consider the harm–benefit ratio. In the sense of methods, this analysis uses the classical issues in a new way and provides recommendations for decision-makers to consider.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informacios Tarsadalom\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informacios Tarsadalom\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.xxiii.2023.2.5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacios Tarsadalom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.xxiii.2023.2.5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下面的研究重点是围绕自我保护和功利的自动驾驶汽车的比较的道德困境。这些车辆可以被编程为在事故中优先考虑乘客的安全,或者优先考虑拯救更多生命的更大利益。本文将探讨各种伦理问题,如评估数字游戏方法,分析与社会不平等相关的慈善原则,以及在自动驾驶汽车的背景下解释自治原则。此外,审查将考虑损益比。在方法意义上,本文对经典问题进行了新的分析,并为决策者提供了考虑的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-protective versus utilitarian autonomous vehicles
The following examination focuses on the moral dilemmas surrounding the comparison of self-protective and utilitarian autonomous vehicles. These vehicles can be programmed to prioritize the safety of passengers in an accident or prioritize the greater good to save more lives. The essay will explore various ethical questions such as evaluating the numbers game approach, analyzing the principles of beneficence correlated with social inequality, and interpreting the principle of autonomy in the context of autonomous vehicles. Additionally, the examination will consider the harm–benefit ratio. In the sense of methods, this analysis uses the classical issues in a new way and provides recommendations for decision-makers to consider.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informacios Tarsadalom
Informacios Tarsadalom INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
„Feltaláltuk újra az internetet?” Szülői bevonódás a digitális nevelésben: szisztematikus szakirodalom-elemzés Makrogazdasági adatok által determinált teniszsikerek 38 OECD-ország elit női játékosának vizsgálatában Az adatműveltség és a kritikai szellem Kiállítási kommunikáció a kiterjesztett térben
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1