对警察不当行为的看法和对警察的满意度:对警察的信心和合法化的作用

IF 1.1 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS African Security Review Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1080/10246029.2023.2226118
Adeola Samuel Adebusuyi, Odunayo Oluwasanmi Oluwafemi, Hauwa Mary Aigboje
{"title":"对警察不当行为的看法和对警察的满意度:对警察的信心和合法化的作用","authors":"Adeola Samuel Adebusuyi, Odunayo Oluwasanmi Oluwafemi, Hauwa Mary Aigboje","doi":"10.1080/10246029.2023.2226118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAnchored on the social exchange theory, this study investigated citizens’ perception of police misconduct on satisfaction with police through the mediating influence of confidence in the police and the moderating influence of legitimisation. The study is cross-sectional, and a sample size of three hundred and thirty-three citizens of Nigeria was recruited through an online survey. The data were analysed using Hayes's PROCESS macro, model 8. We found that the perception of police misconduct did not directly influence confidence and satisfaction in the police. However, the perception of police misconduct led to less satisfaction with police through low confidence in the police. Furthermore, we found that citizens high in police misconduct perception and high in police legitimacy were low in confidence in the police. Additionally, citizens high in police misconduct perception and high in police legitimacy were low in satisfaction with police through less confidence in the police. Finally, we discussed the theoretical and practical implications of this study.KEYWORDS: Police misconductpolice legitimisationconfidence in policesatisfaction with police Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Dia and Jiang, ‘Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Police’, 30–52; Dia and Johnson, ‘Is Neighbourhood Context a Confounder?’, 595–612; Gracia and Cao, ‘Race and Satisfaction with Police’, 191–99; Haberman et al., ‘Satisfaction with Police’, 525–57; Jiang, Sun and Wang, ‘Citizens’ Satisfaction with Police’, 801–21; Karakus, McGarrell, and Basibuyuk, ‘Public Satisfaction with Law Enforcement’, 304–25; Nivette and Akoensi, ‘Determinants of Satisfaction with Police’, 471–87; Reisig and Parks, ‘Experience, Quality of Life, and Neighbourhood Context’, 607–30; Sims, Hooper, and Peterson, ‘Determinant of Citizens’ Attitudes towards Police’, 457–71; Wu, Sun, and Smith, ‘Race, Immigration, and Policing’, 745–74; Wu, Sun, and Triplett, ‘Race, Class or Neighbourhood Context’, 125–56; Zhao et al., ‘Public Satisfaction with Police’, 394–420.2 Boateng, ‘Crime Reporting Behaviour’, 1; Bolger and Walters, ‘Relationship between Police Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy’, 95; Kochel, Parks and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 918.3 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 243.4 Weitzer, ‘Citizens’ Perceptions of Police Misconduct’, 822–24.5 De Angelis and Wolf, ‘Accountability and Public Attitudes towards Local Police’, 232; McNeeley and Grothoff, ‘Racial Tension and Attitudes towards the Police’, 383.6 Lai and Zhao, ‘Impact of Race/Ethnicity, Neighbourhood Context, and Police/Citizen Interaction on Attitudes toward the Police’, 685; Ratcliffe et al., ‘Citizens’ Reactions to Hot Spots Policing’, 393.7 Wu, Sun, and Triplett, ‘Race, Class or Neighbourhood Context’, 125; Gabbidon and Higgins, ‘Role of Race/Ethnicity and Race Relations on Public Opinion’, 102.8 Dai and Jiang, ‘Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Police’, 40.9 Ibid., 41; McNeeley and Grothoff, ‘Racial Tension and Attitudes towards the Police’, 391.10 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 1.11 Akinlabi, ‘Citizens’ Accounts of Police Use of Force’.12 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 242–43.13 Ibid., 241.14 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 4.15 Jang, Lee, and Gibb, ‘Influence of National Government on Confidence in the Police’, 12; Zahnow et al., ‘Living Near Violence’, 4.16 Tyler, ‘Legitimacy and Legitimation’, 375.17 Meares, Tyler, and Gardener, ‘Lawful or Fair’, 101; Papachristos, Meares, and Fagan, ‘Why do Criminals Obey the Law?’, 435–36.18 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 241, 243.19 Boateng, ‘Crime Reporting Behaviour’, 16.20 Bolger and Walters, ‘Relationship between Police Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy’, 94; Murphy and Cherney, ‘Understanding Cooperation with Police’, 181.21 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 918.22 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 8.23 Agbiboa, ‘Policing is not Work’, 4; Akinlabi, ‘Do the Police Really Protect’, 158.24 Homan, Social Behaviour.25 Emerson, ‘Social Exchange Theory,’ 1.26 Homan, Social Behaviour.27 Ibid.28 Tyler and Huo, Trust in the Law.29 Homan, Social Behaviour.30 Davies, Meliala, and Buttle, ‘Gangnam Style versus Eye of the Tiger’, 468.31 Jonck and Swanepoel, ‘Influence of Corruption’, 159; Morris, ‘International Study on Public Confidence in Police’, 416.32 Homan, Social Behaviour.33 Dia and Jiang, ‘Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Police’; Schafer, Huebner, and Bynum, ‘Citizen Perceptions of Police Services’, 440; Weitzer, ‘Incidents of Police Misconduct’, 397; Weitzer and Tuch, ‘Perceptions of Police Misconduct’, 305; Weitzer and Tuch, ‘Public Satisfaction with the Police’, 279.34 Tyler, ‘Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and Effective Rule of Law’, 284.35 Cao, Stack, and Sun, ‘Public Attitudes toward the Police’, 279; Jackson and Sunshine, ‘Public Confidence in Policing’, 214; Jang, Joo, and Zhao, ‘Determinants of Public Confidence in Police’, 57.36 Bolger and Walters, ‘Relationship between Police Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy’, 93; Kochel, Parks and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 900.37 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 912.38 Weitzer, ‘Citizens’ Perceptions of Police Misconduct’, 819, 822–24.39 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 914.40 Murphy, Hinds, and Fleming, ‘Cooperation and Support for Police’, 143.41 Jackson et al., ‘Police Violence and Public Perceptions’, 308.42 Murphy, Hinds, and Fleming, ‘Cooperation and Support for Police’, 143.43 Jackson et al., ‘Police Violence and Public Perceptions’, 308.44 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 912–913.45 Tyler, ‘Trust and Legitimacy’, 254; Tyler, ‘Psychology and Institutional Design’, 50; Tyler, Psychology and Design of Legal Institutions.46 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 914.47 Jackson et al., ‘Police Violence and Public Perceptions’, 308.48 Ibid.49 Weston and Gore, ‘Guide to Structural Equation Modelling’, 735.50 Hayes, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis, x, 23, 440–449, 625.51 Ibid.52 Ibid.53 Davies, Meliala, and Buttle, ‘Gangnam Style versus Eye of the Tiger’, 468; Jonck and Swanepoel, ‘Influence of Corruption’, 159; Morris, ‘International Study on Public Confidence in Police’, 416.54 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 244.55 Ibid.56 Jackson and Bradford, ‘Trust and Confidence’, 241.57 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 1.58 Tyler, ‘Legitimacy and Legitimation’, 375–400.59 Sunshine and Tyler, ‘Procedural Justice and Legitimacy’, 513.60 Tankebe, Reisig, and Wang, ‘Model of Police Legitimacy’, 11.61 Pickett, Nix, and Roche, ‘Model of Police Procedural Justice’, 97; Rosenbaum et al., ‘Attitudes toward the Police’, 343.62 Hough, Jackson, and Bradford, ‘Drivers of Police Legitimacy’, 144.63 Homan, Social Behaviour.64 Akinlabi, ‘Police Use of Force’, 1.65 Akinlabi and Murphy, ‘Compulsion or Perceived Legitimacy?’, 193.66 Tyler, Why People Obey the Law.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAdeola Samuel AdebusuyiAdeola Samuel Adebusuyi is an industrial/organisational psychologist. He is currently a senior lecturer in the Department of Psychology of the Nigeria Police Academy, Wudil Kano. His research interest includes career self-management, especially among youths and young adults, psychology of entrepreneurship, police psychology, and all organisational behaviour-related research. He has published several papers in scholarly journals.Odunayo Oluwasanmi OluwafemiOdunayo Oluwasanmi Oluwafemi is a doctoral candidate at the University of Jos, Nigeria. He has taught Police Psychology, among other courses, at the Nigeria Police Academy, Wudil, Kano, for over nine years. He is currently researching factors influencing relocation stress and adopted coping strategies among transferred police officers in Nigeria. He has published on several topics in academic journals using police and police cadet populations.Hauwa Mary AigbojeHauwa Mary Aigboje is a Nigerian Clinical Psychologist who holds the position of Senior Lecturer and is the current Head of the Department of Psychology at the Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna. She earned a Clinical Psychology doctorate from the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Her research interests include trauma, stress-related reactions, developing resilience, psychological assessment, and the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions focusing on military families, children, and other vulnerable populations. She authors many scholarly articles in her areas of interest and has several years of teaching/research experience.","PeriodicalId":44882,"journal":{"name":"African Security Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception of police misconduct and satisfaction with police: The role of confidence in police and legitimisation\",\"authors\":\"Adeola Samuel Adebusuyi, Odunayo Oluwasanmi Oluwafemi, Hauwa Mary Aigboje\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10246029.2023.2226118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTAnchored on the social exchange theory, this study investigated citizens’ perception of police misconduct on satisfaction with police through the mediating influence of confidence in the police and the moderating influence of legitimisation. The study is cross-sectional, and a sample size of three hundred and thirty-three citizens of Nigeria was recruited through an online survey. The data were analysed using Hayes's PROCESS macro, model 8. We found that the perception of police misconduct did not directly influence confidence and satisfaction in the police. However, the perception of police misconduct led to less satisfaction with police through low confidence in the police. Furthermore, we found that citizens high in police misconduct perception and high in police legitimacy were low in confidence in the police. Additionally, citizens high in police misconduct perception and high in police legitimacy were low in satisfaction with police through less confidence in the police. Finally, we discussed the theoretical and practical implications of this study.KEYWORDS: Police misconductpolice legitimisationconfidence in policesatisfaction with police Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Dia and Jiang, ‘Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Police’, 30–52; Dia and Johnson, ‘Is Neighbourhood Context a Confounder?’, 595–612; Gracia and Cao, ‘Race and Satisfaction with Police’, 191–99; Haberman et al., ‘Satisfaction with Police’, 525–57; Jiang, Sun and Wang, ‘Citizens’ Satisfaction with Police’, 801–21; Karakus, McGarrell, and Basibuyuk, ‘Public Satisfaction with Law Enforcement’, 304–25; Nivette and Akoensi, ‘Determinants of Satisfaction with Police’, 471–87; Reisig and Parks, ‘Experience, Quality of Life, and Neighbourhood Context’, 607–30; Sims, Hooper, and Peterson, ‘Determinant of Citizens’ Attitudes towards Police’, 457–71; Wu, Sun, and Smith, ‘Race, Immigration, and Policing’, 745–74; Wu, Sun, and Triplett, ‘Race, Class or Neighbourhood Context’, 125–56; Zhao et al., ‘Public Satisfaction with Police’, 394–420.2 Boateng, ‘Crime Reporting Behaviour’, 1; Bolger and Walters, ‘Relationship between Police Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy’, 95; Kochel, Parks and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 918.3 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 243.4 Weitzer, ‘Citizens’ Perceptions of Police Misconduct’, 822–24.5 De Angelis and Wolf, ‘Accountability and Public Attitudes towards Local Police’, 232; McNeeley and Grothoff, ‘Racial Tension and Attitudes towards the Police’, 383.6 Lai and Zhao, ‘Impact of Race/Ethnicity, Neighbourhood Context, and Police/Citizen Interaction on Attitudes toward the Police’, 685; Ratcliffe et al., ‘Citizens’ Reactions to Hot Spots Policing’, 393.7 Wu, Sun, and Triplett, ‘Race, Class or Neighbourhood Context’, 125; Gabbidon and Higgins, ‘Role of Race/Ethnicity and Race Relations on Public Opinion’, 102.8 Dai and Jiang, ‘Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Police’, 40.9 Ibid., 41; McNeeley and Grothoff, ‘Racial Tension and Attitudes towards the Police’, 391.10 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 1.11 Akinlabi, ‘Citizens’ Accounts of Police Use of Force’.12 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 242–43.13 Ibid., 241.14 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 4.15 Jang, Lee, and Gibb, ‘Influence of National Government on Confidence in the Police’, 12; Zahnow et al., ‘Living Near Violence’, 4.16 Tyler, ‘Legitimacy and Legitimation’, 375.17 Meares, Tyler, and Gardener, ‘Lawful or Fair’, 101; Papachristos, Meares, and Fagan, ‘Why do Criminals Obey the Law?’, 435–36.18 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 241, 243.19 Boateng, ‘Crime Reporting Behaviour’, 16.20 Bolger and Walters, ‘Relationship between Police Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy’, 94; Murphy and Cherney, ‘Understanding Cooperation with Police’, 181.21 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 918.22 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 8.23 Agbiboa, ‘Policing is not Work’, 4; Akinlabi, ‘Do the Police Really Protect’, 158.24 Homan, Social Behaviour.25 Emerson, ‘Social Exchange Theory,’ 1.26 Homan, Social Behaviour.27 Ibid.28 Tyler and Huo, Trust in the Law.29 Homan, Social Behaviour.30 Davies, Meliala, and Buttle, ‘Gangnam Style versus Eye of the Tiger’, 468.31 Jonck and Swanepoel, ‘Influence of Corruption’, 159; Morris, ‘International Study on Public Confidence in Police’, 416.32 Homan, Social Behaviour.33 Dia and Jiang, ‘Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Police’; Schafer, Huebner, and Bynum, ‘Citizen Perceptions of Police Services’, 440; Weitzer, ‘Incidents of Police Misconduct’, 397; Weitzer and Tuch, ‘Perceptions of Police Misconduct’, 305; Weitzer and Tuch, ‘Public Satisfaction with the Police’, 279.34 Tyler, ‘Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and Effective Rule of Law’, 284.35 Cao, Stack, and Sun, ‘Public Attitudes toward the Police’, 279; Jackson and Sunshine, ‘Public Confidence in Policing’, 214; Jang, Joo, and Zhao, ‘Determinants of Public Confidence in Police’, 57.36 Bolger and Walters, ‘Relationship between Police Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy’, 93; Kochel, Parks and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 900.37 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 912.38 Weitzer, ‘Citizens’ Perceptions of Police Misconduct’, 819, 822–24.39 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 914.40 Murphy, Hinds, and Fleming, ‘Cooperation and Support for Police’, 143.41 Jackson et al., ‘Police Violence and Public Perceptions’, 308.42 Murphy, Hinds, and Fleming, ‘Cooperation and Support for Police’, 143.43 Jackson et al., ‘Police Violence and Public Perceptions’, 308.44 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 912–913.45 Tyler, ‘Trust and Legitimacy’, 254; Tyler, ‘Psychology and Institutional Design’, 50; Tyler, Psychology and Design of Legal Institutions.46 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 914.47 Jackson et al., ‘Police Violence and Public Perceptions’, 308.48 Ibid.49 Weston and Gore, ‘Guide to Structural Equation Modelling’, 735.50 Hayes, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis, x, 23, 440–449, 625.51 Ibid.52 Ibid.53 Davies, Meliala, and Buttle, ‘Gangnam Style versus Eye of the Tiger’, 468; Jonck and Swanepoel, ‘Influence of Corruption’, 159; Morris, ‘International Study on Public Confidence in Police’, 416.54 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 244.55 Ibid.56 Jackson and Bradford, ‘Trust and Confidence’, 241.57 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 1.58 Tyler, ‘Legitimacy and Legitimation’, 375–400.59 Sunshine and Tyler, ‘Procedural Justice and Legitimacy’, 513.60 Tankebe, Reisig, and Wang, ‘Model of Police Legitimacy’, 11.61 Pickett, Nix, and Roche, ‘Model of Police Procedural Justice’, 97; Rosenbaum et al., ‘Attitudes toward the Police’, 343.62 Hough, Jackson, and Bradford, ‘Drivers of Police Legitimacy’, 144.63 Homan, Social Behaviour.64 Akinlabi, ‘Police Use of Force’, 1.65 Akinlabi and Murphy, ‘Compulsion or Perceived Legitimacy?’, 193.66 Tyler, Why People Obey the Law.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAdeola Samuel AdebusuyiAdeola Samuel Adebusuyi is an industrial/organisational psychologist. He is currently a senior lecturer in the Department of Psychology of the Nigeria Police Academy, Wudil Kano. His research interest includes career self-management, especially among youths and young adults, psychology of entrepreneurship, police psychology, and all organisational behaviour-related research. He has published several papers in scholarly journals.Odunayo Oluwasanmi OluwafemiOdunayo Oluwasanmi Oluwafemi is a doctoral candidate at the University of Jos, Nigeria. He has taught Police Psychology, among other courses, at the Nigeria Police Academy, Wudil, Kano, for over nine years. He is currently researching factors influencing relocation stress and adopted coping strategies among transferred police officers in Nigeria. He has published on several topics in academic journals using police and police cadet populations.Hauwa Mary AigbojeHauwa Mary Aigboje is a Nigerian Clinical Psychologist who holds the position of Senior Lecturer and is the current Head of the Department of Psychology at the Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna. She earned a Clinical Psychology doctorate from the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Her research interests include trauma, stress-related reactions, developing resilience, psychological assessment, and the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions focusing on military families, children, and other vulnerable populations. She authors many scholarly articles in her areas of interest and has several years of teaching/research experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Security Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2023.2226118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2023.2226118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要基于社会交换理论,本研究通过警察信任的中介作用和合法化的调节作用,考察了公民对警察不当行为的感知对警察满意度的影响。这项研究是横断面的,通过在线调查招募了330名尼日利亚公民的样本。使用Hayes的PROCESS宏模型8对数据进行分析。我们发现,对警察不当行为的看法并不直接影响对警察的信心和满意度。然而,对警察不当行为的感知导致对警察的满意度降低,对警察的信心降低。此外,我们发现对警察不当行为认知高和警察合法性高的公民对警察的信心较低。此外,对警察不当行为认知较高和警察合法性较高的公民对警察的满意度较低,因为他们对警察的信心较低。最后,我们讨论了本研究的理论和实践意义。关键词:警察的不当行为;警察的合法性;对警察的信心;对警察的满意度;注1:Dia和Jiang,“警察满意度比较研究”,30-52;Dia和Johnson的《邻里环境是一个混杂因素吗?》”,595 - 612;格拉西亚和曹,“种族和对警察的满意度”,191-99;Haberman等人,“对警察的满意度”,525-57;蒋、孙、王,《公民对警察的满意度》,第801-21页;Karakus, McGarrell和Basibuyuk,“公众对执法的满意度”,304-25;Nivette和Akoensi,“警察满意度的决定因素”,471-87;Reisig and Parks,“体验、生活质量和邻里环境”,607-30;Sims, Hooper, and Peterson,“公民对警察态度的决定因素”,457-71;吴、孙、史密斯,《种族、移民和治安》,第745-74页;Wu, Sun, and Triplett,“种族,阶级或邻里语境”,125-56;Zhao et al.,“公众对警察的满意度”,394-420.2 Boateng,“犯罪报告行为”,1;Bolger and Walters,“警察程序正义与警察合法性的关系”,1995;Kochel, Parks和Mastrofski,“与警察的合法性和合作”,918.3 Cao,“对警察的信心”,243.4 Weitzer,“公民对警察不当行为的看法”,822-24.5 De Angelis和Wolf,“问责制和公众对地方警察的态度”,232;McNeeley和Grothoff,“种族紧张和对警察的态度”,383.6 Lai和Zhao,“种族/民族、邻里背景和警察/公民互动对警察态度的影响”,685;Ratcliffe et al.,“公民对热点警务的反应”,393.7 Wu, Sun, and Triplett,“种族,阶级或社区背景”,125;加比顿和希金斯,“种族/民族和种族关系对公众舆论的作用”,102.8戴和江,“对警察满意度的比较研究”,40.9同上,41;McNeeley和Grothoff,“种族紧张关系和对警察的态度”,391.10 Bolger, Lytle和Bolger,“公民对警察满意度的影响因素”,1.11 Akinlabi,“公民对警察使用武力的描述”,12曹,“对警察的信心”,242-43.13同上,241.14 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger,“公民对警察满意度的影响”,4.15 Jang, Lee, and Gibb,“国家政府对警察信心的影响”,12;Zahnow等人,《生活在暴力附近》,4.16 Tyler,《合法性和正当性》,375.17 Meares, Tyler和Gardener,《合法或公平》,101;Papachristos, Meares和Fagan,为什么罪犯遵守法律?, 435-36.18曹,“对警察的信心”,241,243.19博阿滕,“犯罪报告行为”,16.20博尔格和沃尔特斯,“警察程序正义与警察合法性的关系”,94;Murphy和Cherney,“理解与警察的合作”,181.21 Kochel, Parks和Mastrofski,“与警察的合法性和合作”,918.22 Bolger, Lytle和Bolger,“公民对警察满意度的影响因素”,8.23 Agbiboa,“警察不是工作”,4;25艾默森,“社会交换理论”,1.26霍曼,“社会行为学”,27同上。28泰勒和霍,“对法律的信任”。29霍曼,“社会行为学”。30戴维斯,梅利亚拉和巴托,“江南Style vs .老虎之眼”,468.31 Jonck和Swanepoel,“腐败的影响”,159;Morris,“公众对警察信心的国际研究”,《社会行为学》,416.32。33 Dia和Jiang,“警察满意度的比较研究”;Schafer, Huebner, and Bynum,“警察服务的公民感知”,440;Weitzer,“警察不当行为事件”,397;Weitzer和Tuch,“对警察不当行为的看法”,305;Weitzer和Tuch,“公众对警察的满意度”,279.34 Tyler,“程序正义、合法性和有效法治”,284。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perception of police misconduct and satisfaction with police: The role of confidence in police and legitimisation
ABSTRACTAnchored on the social exchange theory, this study investigated citizens’ perception of police misconduct on satisfaction with police through the mediating influence of confidence in the police and the moderating influence of legitimisation. The study is cross-sectional, and a sample size of three hundred and thirty-three citizens of Nigeria was recruited through an online survey. The data were analysed using Hayes's PROCESS macro, model 8. We found that the perception of police misconduct did not directly influence confidence and satisfaction in the police. However, the perception of police misconduct led to less satisfaction with police through low confidence in the police. Furthermore, we found that citizens high in police misconduct perception and high in police legitimacy were low in confidence in the police. Additionally, citizens high in police misconduct perception and high in police legitimacy were low in satisfaction with police through less confidence in the police. Finally, we discussed the theoretical and practical implications of this study.KEYWORDS: Police misconductpolice legitimisationconfidence in policesatisfaction with police Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Dia and Jiang, ‘Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Police’, 30–52; Dia and Johnson, ‘Is Neighbourhood Context a Confounder?’, 595–612; Gracia and Cao, ‘Race and Satisfaction with Police’, 191–99; Haberman et al., ‘Satisfaction with Police’, 525–57; Jiang, Sun and Wang, ‘Citizens’ Satisfaction with Police’, 801–21; Karakus, McGarrell, and Basibuyuk, ‘Public Satisfaction with Law Enforcement’, 304–25; Nivette and Akoensi, ‘Determinants of Satisfaction with Police’, 471–87; Reisig and Parks, ‘Experience, Quality of Life, and Neighbourhood Context’, 607–30; Sims, Hooper, and Peterson, ‘Determinant of Citizens’ Attitudes towards Police’, 457–71; Wu, Sun, and Smith, ‘Race, Immigration, and Policing’, 745–74; Wu, Sun, and Triplett, ‘Race, Class or Neighbourhood Context’, 125–56; Zhao et al., ‘Public Satisfaction with Police’, 394–420.2 Boateng, ‘Crime Reporting Behaviour’, 1; Bolger and Walters, ‘Relationship between Police Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy’, 95; Kochel, Parks and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 918.3 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 243.4 Weitzer, ‘Citizens’ Perceptions of Police Misconduct’, 822–24.5 De Angelis and Wolf, ‘Accountability and Public Attitudes towards Local Police’, 232; McNeeley and Grothoff, ‘Racial Tension and Attitudes towards the Police’, 383.6 Lai and Zhao, ‘Impact of Race/Ethnicity, Neighbourhood Context, and Police/Citizen Interaction on Attitudes toward the Police’, 685; Ratcliffe et al., ‘Citizens’ Reactions to Hot Spots Policing’, 393.7 Wu, Sun, and Triplett, ‘Race, Class or Neighbourhood Context’, 125; Gabbidon and Higgins, ‘Role of Race/Ethnicity and Race Relations on Public Opinion’, 102.8 Dai and Jiang, ‘Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Police’, 40.9 Ibid., 41; McNeeley and Grothoff, ‘Racial Tension and Attitudes towards the Police’, 391.10 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 1.11 Akinlabi, ‘Citizens’ Accounts of Police Use of Force’.12 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 242–43.13 Ibid., 241.14 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 4.15 Jang, Lee, and Gibb, ‘Influence of National Government on Confidence in the Police’, 12; Zahnow et al., ‘Living Near Violence’, 4.16 Tyler, ‘Legitimacy and Legitimation’, 375.17 Meares, Tyler, and Gardener, ‘Lawful or Fair’, 101; Papachristos, Meares, and Fagan, ‘Why do Criminals Obey the Law?’, 435–36.18 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 241, 243.19 Boateng, ‘Crime Reporting Behaviour’, 16.20 Bolger and Walters, ‘Relationship between Police Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy’, 94; Murphy and Cherney, ‘Understanding Cooperation with Police’, 181.21 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 918.22 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 8.23 Agbiboa, ‘Policing is not Work’, 4; Akinlabi, ‘Do the Police Really Protect’, 158.24 Homan, Social Behaviour.25 Emerson, ‘Social Exchange Theory,’ 1.26 Homan, Social Behaviour.27 Ibid.28 Tyler and Huo, Trust in the Law.29 Homan, Social Behaviour.30 Davies, Meliala, and Buttle, ‘Gangnam Style versus Eye of the Tiger’, 468.31 Jonck and Swanepoel, ‘Influence of Corruption’, 159; Morris, ‘International Study on Public Confidence in Police’, 416.32 Homan, Social Behaviour.33 Dia and Jiang, ‘Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Police’; Schafer, Huebner, and Bynum, ‘Citizen Perceptions of Police Services’, 440; Weitzer, ‘Incidents of Police Misconduct’, 397; Weitzer and Tuch, ‘Perceptions of Police Misconduct’, 305; Weitzer and Tuch, ‘Public Satisfaction with the Police’, 279.34 Tyler, ‘Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and Effective Rule of Law’, 284.35 Cao, Stack, and Sun, ‘Public Attitudes toward the Police’, 279; Jackson and Sunshine, ‘Public Confidence in Policing’, 214; Jang, Joo, and Zhao, ‘Determinants of Public Confidence in Police’, 57.36 Bolger and Walters, ‘Relationship between Police Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy’, 93; Kochel, Parks and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 900.37 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 912.38 Weitzer, ‘Citizens’ Perceptions of Police Misconduct’, 819, 822–24.39 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 914.40 Murphy, Hinds, and Fleming, ‘Cooperation and Support for Police’, 143.41 Jackson et al., ‘Police Violence and Public Perceptions’, 308.42 Murphy, Hinds, and Fleming, ‘Cooperation and Support for Police’, 143.43 Jackson et al., ‘Police Violence and Public Perceptions’, 308.44 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 912–913.45 Tyler, ‘Trust and Legitimacy’, 254; Tyler, ‘Psychology and Institutional Design’, 50; Tyler, Psychology and Design of Legal Institutions.46 Kochel, Parks, and Mastrofski, ‘Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police’, 914.47 Jackson et al., ‘Police Violence and Public Perceptions’, 308.48 Ibid.49 Weston and Gore, ‘Guide to Structural Equation Modelling’, 735.50 Hayes, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis, x, 23, 440–449, 625.51 Ibid.52 Ibid.53 Davies, Meliala, and Buttle, ‘Gangnam Style versus Eye of the Tiger’, 468; Jonck and Swanepoel, ‘Influence of Corruption’, 159; Morris, ‘International Study on Public Confidence in Police’, 416.54 Cao, ‘Confidence in the Police’, 244.55 Ibid.56 Jackson and Bradford, ‘Trust and Confidence’, 241.57 Bolger, Lytle, and Bolger, ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police’, 1.58 Tyler, ‘Legitimacy and Legitimation’, 375–400.59 Sunshine and Tyler, ‘Procedural Justice and Legitimacy’, 513.60 Tankebe, Reisig, and Wang, ‘Model of Police Legitimacy’, 11.61 Pickett, Nix, and Roche, ‘Model of Police Procedural Justice’, 97; Rosenbaum et al., ‘Attitudes toward the Police’, 343.62 Hough, Jackson, and Bradford, ‘Drivers of Police Legitimacy’, 144.63 Homan, Social Behaviour.64 Akinlabi, ‘Police Use of Force’, 1.65 Akinlabi and Murphy, ‘Compulsion or Perceived Legitimacy?’, 193.66 Tyler, Why People Obey the Law.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAdeola Samuel AdebusuyiAdeola Samuel Adebusuyi is an industrial/organisational psychologist. He is currently a senior lecturer in the Department of Psychology of the Nigeria Police Academy, Wudil Kano. His research interest includes career self-management, especially among youths and young adults, psychology of entrepreneurship, police psychology, and all organisational behaviour-related research. He has published several papers in scholarly journals.Odunayo Oluwasanmi OluwafemiOdunayo Oluwasanmi Oluwafemi is a doctoral candidate at the University of Jos, Nigeria. He has taught Police Psychology, among other courses, at the Nigeria Police Academy, Wudil, Kano, for over nine years. He is currently researching factors influencing relocation stress and adopted coping strategies among transferred police officers in Nigeria. He has published on several topics in academic journals using police and police cadet populations.Hauwa Mary AigbojeHauwa Mary Aigboje is a Nigerian Clinical Psychologist who holds the position of Senior Lecturer and is the current Head of the Department of Psychology at the Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna. She earned a Clinical Psychology doctorate from the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Her research interests include trauma, stress-related reactions, developing resilience, psychological assessment, and the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions focusing on military families, children, and other vulnerable populations. She authors many scholarly articles in her areas of interest and has several years of teaching/research experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Security Review
African Security Review INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Market warfare strategy and rural armed banditry in Zamfara State, Nigeria Reimagining counter-piracy efforts in the Gulf of Guinea: Lessons from the theory of infrastructure for coordination and information sharing* The Dynamics of African traditional justice systems: Perspectives and prospective Missed or misused opportunity? Social cohesion, national dialogue and peacebuilding in Cameroon Evaluation and clustering of health security performance in Africa: A comparative analysis through the entropy-TOPSIS-K-means approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1