MiniCone, CPT和桩相关性的主导因素:基于数据的方法

Seyed Sajad Shirani, Abolfazl Eslami, Amirhossein Ebrahimipour, Moses Karakouzian
{"title":"MiniCone, CPT和桩相关性的主导因素:基于数据的方法","authors":"Seyed Sajad Shirani,&nbsp;Abolfazl Eslami,&nbsp;Amirhossein Ebrahimipour,&nbsp;Moses Karakouzian","doi":"10.1002/dug2.12055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cone penetration test (CPT) contributes to the design and analysis of piles regarding geometry, installation effect, and pile capacity (shaft and toe resistance). MiniCone, as an alternative to CPT sounding, has been used to carry out field and laboratory investigations by physical modeling. More tests can be practically carried out through light equipment and small soil mass, involving fewer errors caused by boundary conditions. Furthermore, it can be used for in situ testing, such as quality control, assessment of ground improvement, and subgrade characterization. A database comprising MiniCone and CPT records in field and physical modeling is proposed with a variety of cone diameters. The case study records in the database have been obtained from 140 tests compiled from data from 26 sources. The sources include the results of 20 physical modelings and field data from six sites in 10 countries. The data comprise MiniCone and CPT cone tip resistance (), and sleeve friction (). The different cones are used in sandy, silty sand, and clayey soils via simple chambers (1 g), calibration chambers, and frustum confining vessels. In addition, correlations were found in penetration records in terms of physical modeling types, cone diameters, penetration rates, and soil densities. Moreover, and are related to capacities of pile toes and shafts using proper correlation coefficients less than unity, respectively. Correlations and dominant factors in geotechnical practice between MiniCone, CPT, and pile have been reviewed and discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100363,"journal":{"name":"Deep Underground Science and Engineering","volume":"2 4","pages":"346-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dug2.12055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dominant factors in MiniCone, CPT and pile correlations: A data-based approach\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Sajad Shirani,&nbsp;Abolfazl Eslami,&nbsp;Amirhossein Ebrahimipour,&nbsp;Moses Karakouzian\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dug2.12055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The cone penetration test (CPT) contributes to the design and analysis of piles regarding geometry, installation effect, and pile capacity (shaft and toe resistance). MiniCone, as an alternative to CPT sounding, has been used to carry out field and laboratory investigations by physical modeling. More tests can be practically carried out through light equipment and small soil mass, involving fewer errors caused by boundary conditions. Furthermore, it can be used for in situ testing, such as quality control, assessment of ground improvement, and subgrade characterization. A database comprising MiniCone and CPT records in field and physical modeling is proposed with a variety of cone diameters. The case study records in the database have been obtained from 140 tests compiled from data from 26 sources. The sources include the results of 20 physical modelings and field data from six sites in 10 countries. The data comprise MiniCone and CPT cone tip resistance (), and sleeve friction (). The different cones are used in sandy, silty sand, and clayey soils via simple chambers (1 g), calibration chambers, and frustum confining vessels. In addition, correlations were found in penetration records in terms of physical modeling types, cone diameters, penetration rates, and soil densities. Moreover, and are related to capacities of pile toes and shafts using proper correlation coefficients less than unity, respectively. Correlations and dominant factors in geotechnical practice between MiniCone, CPT, and pile have been reviewed and discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deep Underground Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"346-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dug2.12055\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deep Underground Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dug2.12055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deep Underground Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dug2.12055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

圆锥贯入试验(CPT)有助于设计和分析桩的几何形状、安装效果和桩的承载力(轴和趾阻力)。MiniCone作为CPT测深的替代方案,已被用于通过物理建模进行现场和实验室调查。通过较轻的设备和较小的土体,可以实际地进行更多的试验,涉及较少的边界条件引起的误差。此外,它可以用于现场测试,如质量控制,评估地基改善,和路基表征。提出了一个包含MiniCone和CPT现场记录和物理建模记录的数据库,具有不同的锥体直径。数据库中的案例研究记录是从26个来源的数据汇编而成的140项试验中获得的。资料来源包括20个物理模型的结果和来自10个国家6个地点的现场数据。数据包括MiniCone和CPT锥尖阻力()和套筒摩擦()。不同的锥体通过简单的腔室(1克)、校准腔室和锥台限制容器在沙质、粉质和粘土中使用。此外,在物理模拟类型、锥体直径、渗透速率和土壤密度方面,还发现了渗透记录的相关性。与桩端承载力和桩身承载力分别采用小于1的相关系数进行关联。对MiniCone、CPT和桩在岩土工程实践中的相关性和主导因素进行了综述和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dominant factors in MiniCone, CPT and pile correlations: A data-based approach

The cone penetration test (CPT) contributes to the design and analysis of piles regarding geometry, installation effect, and pile capacity (shaft and toe resistance). MiniCone, as an alternative to CPT sounding, has been used to carry out field and laboratory investigations by physical modeling. More tests can be practically carried out through light equipment and small soil mass, involving fewer errors caused by boundary conditions. Furthermore, it can be used for in situ testing, such as quality control, assessment of ground improvement, and subgrade characterization. A database comprising MiniCone and CPT records in field and physical modeling is proposed with a variety of cone diameters. The case study records in the database have been obtained from 140 tests compiled from data from 26 sources. The sources include the results of 20 physical modelings and field data from six sites in 10 countries. The data comprise MiniCone and CPT cone tip resistance (), and sleeve friction (). The different cones are used in sandy, silty sand, and clayey soils via simple chambers (1 g), calibration chambers, and frustum confining vessels. In addition, correlations were found in penetration records in terms of physical modeling types, cone diameters, penetration rates, and soil densities. Moreover, and are related to capacities of pile toes and shafts using proper correlation coefficients less than unity, respectively. Correlations and dominant factors in geotechnical practice between MiniCone, CPT, and pile have been reviewed and discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Two-year growth of Deep Underground Science and Engineering: A perspective Acknowledgment of reviewers A review of mechanical deformation and seepage mechanism of rock with filled joints Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1