我们怎么办?按合同类型和技能特殊性解释培训偏好的小故事研究

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS International Labour Review Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12414
Ferry KOSTER
{"title":"我们怎么办?按合同类型和技能特殊性解释培训偏好的小故事研究","authors":"Ferry KOSTER","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article presents a vignette experiment conducted in the Netherlands to study workers’ training preferences. Human capital theory, signalling theory and insights from the “new employment relationship” inform the hypothesis that training preferences depend on the specificity of the skills targeted by training in combination with employment contract type. The results confirm this hypothesis and indicate that, although workers on open-ended contracts have a stronger relative preference for organization-specific skills than temporary workers - who have a stronger relative preference for general skills - all workers prefer training aimed at general over organization-specific skills. Workers on temporary contracts are moreover found to receive less training in practice than they would like.</p>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"163 2","pages":"225-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What about us? A vignette study explaining training preferences by contract type and skill specificity\",\"authors\":\"Ferry KOSTER\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ilr.12414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article presents a vignette experiment conducted in the Netherlands to study workers’ training preferences. Human capital theory, signalling theory and insights from the “new employment relationship” inform the hypothesis that training preferences depend on the specificity of the skills targeted by training in combination with employment contract type. The results confirm this hypothesis and indicate that, although workers on open-ended contracts have a stronger relative preference for organization-specific skills than temporary workers - who have a stronger relative preference for general skills - all workers prefer training aimed at general over organization-specific skills. Workers on temporary contracts are moreover found to receive less training in practice than they would like.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Labour Review\",\"volume\":\"163 2\",\"pages\":\"225-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Labour Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12414\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了荷兰为研究工人的培训偏好而开展的一项小实验。人力资本理论、信号理论和对 "新雇佣关系 "的理解为我们提出了一个假设,即培训偏好取决于培训目标技能的特殊性和雇佣合同类型。研究结果证实了这一假设,并表明,尽管与临时工相比,无固定期限合同工对组织特定技能的相对偏好更高(临时工对一般技能的相对偏好更高),但所有工人都更喜欢针对一般技能的培训,而不是针对组织特定技能的培训。此外,还发现临时合同工实际接受的培训比他们希望的要少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What about us? A vignette study explaining training preferences by contract type and skill specificity

This article presents a vignette experiment conducted in the Netherlands to study workers’ training preferences. Human capital theory, signalling theory and insights from the “new employment relationship” inform the hypothesis that training preferences depend on the specificity of the skills targeted by training in combination with employment contract type. The results confirm this hypothesis and indicate that, although workers on open-ended contracts have a stronger relative preference for organization-specific skills than temporary workers - who have a stronger relative preference for general skills - all workers prefer training aimed at general over organization-specific skills. Workers on temporary contracts are moreover found to receive less training in practice than they would like.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.
期刊最新文献
The persistence of informality in paid domestic work in Argentina Introduction: The formalization of paid domestic work – Current trajectories and challenges ahead Issue Information – TOC From dead letter to functional policy? Domestic workers' rights and “disformality” in Peru Domestic workers' organizations and participatory approaches to labour standards enforcement: The case of Jamaica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1