为什么人们不合作?通过实验探讨合作的不足

Q4 Social Sciences Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-008
Fabricio Baron Mussi, Anderson Catapan, Ubiratã Tortato
{"title":"为什么人们不合作?通过实验探讨合作的不足","authors":"Fabricio Baron Mussi, Anderson Catapan, Ubiratã Tortato","doi":"10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study sought to investigate, from the perspective of Game Theory, the reasons for the “non-cooperation” of certain groups that depend on a specific reservoir for water supply, considering the influence of economic incentives.
 
 Method: Public good game experiments were carried out with 60 recyclable material collectors, 63 indigenous people, 55 university students and 68 professional fishermen. Subsequently, semi-structured interviews complemented the data collection strategy.
 
 Results and conclusion: Among the main results, we can mention the opportunistic behavior in the group of collectors, sociocultural issues in the indigenous context, the perception of inequality of earnings among students, individual work and independence from the group, in this case of fishermen. It appears that understanding this multiplicity of factors involved in the decision not to cooperate can encourage new discussions regarding the formulation of policies aimed at preserving public goods, going beyond the mere use of punishment and reward based on inspection actions.
 
 Originality/value: The need to understand the context of these groups, and others equally benefiting from certain public goods, would be valuable to reduce non-cooperative behavior.","PeriodicalId":38210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why don’t People Cooperate? Exploring the Lack of Cooperation Through the use of Experiments\",\"authors\":\"Fabricio Baron Mussi, Anderson Catapan, Ubiratã Tortato\",\"doi\":\"10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study sought to investigate, from the perspective of Game Theory, the reasons for the “non-cooperation” of certain groups that depend on a specific reservoir for water supply, considering the influence of economic incentives.
 
 Method: Public good game experiments were carried out with 60 recyclable material collectors, 63 indigenous people, 55 university students and 68 professional fishermen. Subsequently, semi-structured interviews complemented the data collection strategy.
 
 Results and conclusion: Among the main results, we can mention the opportunistic behavior in the group of collectors, sociocultural issues in the indigenous context, the perception of inequality of earnings among students, individual work and independence from the group, in this case of fishermen. It appears that understanding this multiplicity of factors involved in the decision not to cooperate can encourage new discussions regarding the formulation of policies aimed at preserving public goods, going beyond the mere use of punishment and reward based on inspection actions.
 
 Originality/value: The need to understand the context of these groups, and others equally benefiting from certain public goods, would be valuable to reduce non-cooperative behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究试图从博弈论的角度,在考虑经济激励的影响下,探讨依赖特定水库供水的特定群体“不合作”的原因。 & # x0D;方法:对60名回收材料收集者、63名土著居民、55名大学生和68名职业渔民进行公益博弈实验。随后,半结构化访谈补充了数据收集策略。 & # x0D;结果和结论:在主要结果中,我们可以提到收集者群体中的机会主义行为、土著背景下的社会文化问题、学生对收入不平等的看法、个人工作和独立于群体(在本例中是渔民)。看来,了解不合作决定所涉及的这种多重因素可以鼓励就制定旨在维护公共利益的政策进行新的讨论,而不仅仅是根据检查行动使用奖惩。& # x0D;原创性/价值:需要了解这些群体的背景,以及其他同样受益于某些公共产品的群体,这对于减少非合作行为是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why don’t People Cooperate? Exploring the Lack of Cooperation Through the use of Experiments
Objective: This study sought to investigate, from the perspective of Game Theory, the reasons for the “non-cooperation” of certain groups that depend on a specific reservoir for water supply, considering the influence of economic incentives. Method: Public good game experiments were carried out with 60 recyclable material collectors, 63 indigenous people, 55 university students and 68 professional fishermen. Subsequently, semi-structured interviews complemented the data collection strategy. Results and conclusion: Among the main results, we can mention the opportunistic behavior in the group of collectors, sociocultural issues in the indigenous context, the perception of inequality of earnings among students, individual work and independence from the group, in this case of fishermen. It appears that understanding this multiplicity of factors involved in the decision not to cooperate can encourage new discussions regarding the formulation of policies aimed at preserving public goods, going beyond the mere use of punishment and reward based on inspection actions. Originality/value: The need to understand the context of these groups, and others equally benefiting from certain public goods, would be valuable to reduce non-cooperative behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Barriers and Drivers to Adoption of Water Reuse In Buildings: A Sociotechnical Analysis in Ceará, Brazil Analysis of the Integrated Basic Sanitation Concession Model Adopted by the Municipality of São Simão, Goiás Evaluation of the Technological Properties of Artificial Agglomerated Stones in Epoxy Resin and Castor Oil-Based Vegetable Polyurethane Matrix Future Scenarios For Land use and Coverage in the Morro do Chapéu State Park/Bahia/Brazil My Home is no Longer a Safe Place for my Emotional Health: Home-Office Work and its Consequences on Emotional Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1