同步远程协作数字媒体项目:对学习者宏观和微观水平口语能力和跨文化能力的比较影响

IF 6 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Computer Assisted Language Learning Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1080/09588221.2023.2269412
Marwa F. Hafour, Dustin De Felice, Greg Kessler
{"title":"同步远程协作数字媒体项目:对学习者宏观和微观水平口语能力和跨文化能力的比较影响","authors":"Marwa F. Hafour, Dustin De Felice, Greg Kessler","doi":"10.1080/09588221.2023.2269412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBeing described as two sides of one coin, language and culture are increasingly recommended to be inseparably addressed. Thanks to technological advances, this is now more feasible than before. In response, this study examined the comparative effects of synchronous and asynchronous telecollaborative digital media projects (DMPs) on learners’ macro-and micro-level oral proficiency and intercultural competence. Telecollaboration took place between Egyptian TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign Language) student-teachers (N = 56, randomly selected) and a convenient sample of English natives (N = 28) at Michigan State University in the US. Each group was randomly assigned to two groups: synchronous and asynchronous. The concurrent triangulation mixed-method design was followed to collect and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data. The study concluded that synchronous and asynchronous telecollaborative DMPs yielded improvements in all micro-and macro-level oral proficiency skills except discourse management, which did not only improve among the synchronous participants but also retreated among the asynchronous ones. Also, synchronous telecollaborators outperformed the asynchronous ones in all macro-and micro-level skills except vocabulary and grammar. Besides, despite improvement after telecollaboration, none of the four groups outdid the others either in overall or factor-level intercultural competence. Qualitative findings revealed that TEFL participants appreciated telecollaboration and DMP generation and exchange activities, whereas they were dissatisfied with the inadequate and unequal opportunities for interaction with the natives, native speakers being too natural, and being restricted to single-mode interaction. However, they reported a number of linguistic, cultural, and emotional gains from these experiences.Keywords: Synchronous and asynchronoustelecollaborationdigital media projectsmacro-and micro-level oral proficiencyintercultural competence Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethical approvalBoth the TEFL and native participants in the current study were volunteers. An informed consent form was filled out by them prior to participating in the study and after explaining the treatment procedures in detail. The participants’ anonymity was also assured. There are no essential conflicts of interest. The study protocol was reviewed by the IRB (Institutional Review Board) at Michigan State University (MSU) and, consequently, has been approved (MSU study IRB approval ID: STUDY00007691).","PeriodicalId":47787,"journal":{"name":"Computer Assisted Language Learning","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A/synchronous telecollaborative digital media projects: comparative effects on learners’ macro-and micro-level oral proficiency and intercultural competence\",\"authors\":\"Marwa F. Hafour, Dustin De Felice, Greg Kessler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09588221.2023.2269412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractBeing described as two sides of one coin, language and culture are increasingly recommended to be inseparably addressed. Thanks to technological advances, this is now more feasible than before. In response, this study examined the comparative effects of synchronous and asynchronous telecollaborative digital media projects (DMPs) on learners’ macro-and micro-level oral proficiency and intercultural competence. Telecollaboration took place between Egyptian TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign Language) student-teachers (N = 56, randomly selected) and a convenient sample of English natives (N = 28) at Michigan State University in the US. Each group was randomly assigned to two groups: synchronous and asynchronous. The concurrent triangulation mixed-method design was followed to collect and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data. The study concluded that synchronous and asynchronous telecollaborative DMPs yielded improvements in all micro-and macro-level oral proficiency skills except discourse management, which did not only improve among the synchronous participants but also retreated among the asynchronous ones. Also, synchronous telecollaborators outperformed the asynchronous ones in all macro-and micro-level skills except vocabulary and grammar. Besides, despite improvement after telecollaboration, none of the four groups outdid the others either in overall or factor-level intercultural competence. Qualitative findings revealed that TEFL participants appreciated telecollaboration and DMP generation and exchange activities, whereas they were dissatisfied with the inadequate and unequal opportunities for interaction with the natives, native speakers being too natural, and being restricted to single-mode interaction. However, they reported a number of linguistic, cultural, and emotional gains from these experiences.Keywords: Synchronous and asynchronoustelecollaborationdigital media projectsmacro-and micro-level oral proficiencyintercultural competence Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethical approvalBoth the TEFL and native participants in the current study were volunteers. An informed consent form was filled out by them prior to participating in the study and after explaining the treatment procedures in detail. The participants’ anonymity was also assured. There are no essential conflicts of interest. The study protocol was reviewed by the IRB (Institutional Review Board) at Michigan State University (MSU) and, consequently, has been approved (MSU study IRB approval ID: STUDY00007691).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Assisted Language Learning\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Assisted Language Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2269412\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Assisted Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2269412","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要语言和文化被称为一枚硬币的两面,越来越被认为是不可分割的。由于技术的进步,这比以前更可行。为此,本研究考察了同步和异步远程协作数字媒体项目(dmp)对学习者宏观和微观层面的口语能力和跨文化能力的比较影响。远程协作在埃及TEFL(英语作为外语教学)学生教师(N = 56,随机选择)和美国密歇根州立大学的英语母语学生(N = 28)之间进行。每组随机分为两组:同步组和异步组。采用并行三角剖分混合法设计,对定量和定性数据进行采集和分析。研究发现,同步和异步远程协作dmp在微观和宏观层面的口语熟练程度均有提高,但话语管理水平在同步参与者中有所提高,而在异步参与者中有所下降。此外,除了词汇和语法外,同步远程协作者在所有宏观和微观层面的技能上都优于异步远程协作者。此外,尽管远程协作后有所改善,但在整体或因素层面的跨文化能力方面,四组都没有超过其他组。定性研究发现,TEFL参与者对远程协作、DMP生成和交流活动表示赞赏,而对与母语人士互动的机会不足和不平等、母语人士过于自然、仅限于单一模式的互动感到不满。然而,他们从这些经历中获得了许多语言、文化和情感上的收获。关键词:同步与异步合作;数字媒体项目;宏观与微观水平;口语熟练程度;跨文化能力披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。道德认可在当前的研究中,TEFL和母语参与者都是志愿者。在参与研究之前和详细解释治疗程序之后,他们填写了知情同意书。参与者的匿名性也得到了保证。没有根本的利益冲突。研究方案由密歇根州立大学(MSU)的IRB(机构审查委员会)审查,因此已获得批准(MSU研究IRB批准ID: STUDY00007691)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A/synchronous telecollaborative digital media projects: comparative effects on learners’ macro-and micro-level oral proficiency and intercultural competence
AbstractBeing described as two sides of one coin, language and culture are increasingly recommended to be inseparably addressed. Thanks to technological advances, this is now more feasible than before. In response, this study examined the comparative effects of synchronous and asynchronous telecollaborative digital media projects (DMPs) on learners’ macro-and micro-level oral proficiency and intercultural competence. Telecollaboration took place between Egyptian TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign Language) student-teachers (N = 56, randomly selected) and a convenient sample of English natives (N = 28) at Michigan State University in the US. Each group was randomly assigned to two groups: synchronous and asynchronous. The concurrent triangulation mixed-method design was followed to collect and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data. The study concluded that synchronous and asynchronous telecollaborative DMPs yielded improvements in all micro-and macro-level oral proficiency skills except discourse management, which did not only improve among the synchronous participants but also retreated among the asynchronous ones. Also, synchronous telecollaborators outperformed the asynchronous ones in all macro-and micro-level skills except vocabulary and grammar. Besides, despite improvement after telecollaboration, none of the four groups outdid the others either in overall or factor-level intercultural competence. Qualitative findings revealed that TEFL participants appreciated telecollaboration and DMP generation and exchange activities, whereas they were dissatisfied with the inadequate and unequal opportunities for interaction with the natives, native speakers being too natural, and being restricted to single-mode interaction. However, they reported a number of linguistic, cultural, and emotional gains from these experiences.Keywords: Synchronous and asynchronoustelecollaborationdigital media projectsmacro-and micro-level oral proficiencyintercultural competence Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethical approvalBoth the TEFL and native participants in the current study were volunteers. An informed consent form was filled out by them prior to participating in the study and after explaining the treatment procedures in detail. The participants’ anonymity was also assured. There are no essential conflicts of interest. The study protocol was reviewed by the IRB (Institutional Review Board) at Michigan State University (MSU) and, consequently, has been approved (MSU study IRB approval ID: STUDY00007691).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) is an intercontinental and interdisciplinary journal which leads the field in its dedication to all matters associated with the use of computers in language learning (L1 and L2), teaching and testing. It provides a forum to discuss the discoveries in the field and to exchange experience and information about existing techniques. The scope of the journal is intentionally wide-ranging and embraces a multitude of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Influence of semiotic resources on peer interactions during collaborative digital multimodal composing The design and implementation of virtual reality simulations in Spanish for the Health Professions: what are learners’ perceptions? Integrating large language models into EFL writing instruction: effects on performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation Linking EFL students’ psychological needs to engagement in Informal Digital Learning of English: a structural equation modeling analysis Modelling Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in language MOOCs: a control-value perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1