超前科学价值观的差异-干涉模型

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Res Philosophica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5840/resphilosophica2023928102
Jacob Stegenga, Tarun Menon
{"title":"超前科学价值观的差异-干涉模型","authors":"Jacob Stegenga, Tarun Menon","doi":"10.5840/resphilosophica2023928102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The value-free ideal for science holds that values should not influence the core features of scientific reasoning. We defend the difference-to-inference model of value-permeation, which holds that value-permeation in science is problematic when values make a difference to the inferences made about a hypothesis. This view of value-permeation is superior to existing views, and it suggests a corresponding maxim—namely, that scientists should strive to eliminate differences to inference. This maxim is the basis of a novel value-free ideal for science.","PeriodicalId":44475,"journal":{"name":"Res Philosophica","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Difference-to-Interference Model for Values in Science in advance\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Stegenga, Tarun Menon\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/resphilosophica2023928102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The value-free ideal for science holds that values should not influence the core features of scientific reasoning. We defend the difference-to-inference model of value-permeation, which holds that value-permeation in science is problematic when values make a difference to the inferences made about a hypothesis. This view of value-permeation is superior to existing views, and it suggests a corresponding maxim—namely, that scientists should strive to eliminate differences to inference. This maxim is the basis of a novel value-free ideal for science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Res Philosophica\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Res Philosophica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/resphilosophica2023928102\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/resphilosophica2023928102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学的无价值理想认为,价值不应该影响科学推理的核心特征。我们为价值渗透的差异-推理模型辩护,该模型认为,当价值对假设的推论产生影响时,科学中的价值渗透是有问题的。这种价值渗透的观点优于现有的观点,并提出了一个相应的准则,即科学家应该努力消除推理的差异。这一格言是一种全新的、与价值无关的科学理想的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Difference-to-Interference Model for Values in Science in advance
The value-free ideal for science holds that values should not influence the core features of scientific reasoning. We defend the difference-to-inference model of value-permeation, which holds that value-permeation in science is problematic when values make a difference to the inferences made about a hypothesis. This view of value-permeation is superior to existing views, and it suggests a corresponding maxim—namely, that scientists should strive to eliminate differences to inference. This maxim is the basis of a novel value-free ideal for science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Res Philosophica
Res Philosophica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Sosa on the New Evil Demon Problem A Neuro-Yogācāra Manifesto Holistic Cognitive Style, Chinese Culture, and the Sinification of Buddhism Why Variation Matters to Philosophy ``See You in Your Next Life'': Creativity, the Zhuangzi, and Grief
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1