在计划行为理论中区分情绪:与可持续食品消费主义相关的改进预测的证据

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY British Food Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1108/bfj-05-2023-0357
Mara Martini, Francesco La Barbera, Susanna Schmidt, Chiara Rollero, Angela Fedi
{"title":"在计划行为理论中区分情绪:与可持续食品消费主义相关的改进预测的证据","authors":"Mara Martini, Francesco La Barbera, Susanna Schmidt, Chiara Rollero, Angela Fedi","doi":"10.1108/bfj-05-2023-0357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and its extensions are often used to explain intentions to perform sustainable behaviours. Emotions can provide the impetus for action and should be considered in high-involvement situations, such as sustainable food purchase decisions. Therefore, the aim of this research work was to investigate whether the addition of different types of emotions (self-related, social and pro-active) to the TPB main constructs – attitude (ATT), subjective norm (SN) and perceived behavioural control (PBC) – improves the explanation of intention to make two sustainable food purchase choices: purchase Fairtrade (FT) products and purchase through solidarity purchasing groups (SPGs). Design/methodology/approach The present investigation was conducted by two studies using online questionnaires and focussing on purchasing FT food products (Study 1) and purchasing food through SPGs (Study 2). Stepwise regression models were run to explain the intention to purchase FT products (Study 1; N = 240) and the intention to purchase through SPGs (Study 2; N = 209). Findings Results show that emotions increase the predictive validity of the TPB model. The study also highlights the importance to distinguish between different types of emotions. Amongst those considered in both studies, only pro-active emotions play a significant role in predicting food purchasing intention. Results encourage further investigation of the role of emotions in TPB-based models for predicting sustainable food purchase choices. Research limitations/implications The measurement of the three classical antecedents of the TPB model (ATT, SNs and PBC) performed by single items can be considered the main limitation of this work. In future research, instruments made up of more items measuring these three theoretical dimensions should be used. In addition, it would be important to conduct an analysis of the beliefs that determine ATTs, norms and perceived control. Originality/value Different from previous studies that considered emotions in extension of the TPB model to explain sustainable behaviours, the present work separately analysed the role of three different kinds of emotions (self-related, social and pro-active) in explaining sustainable food behaviours.","PeriodicalId":9231,"journal":{"name":"British Food Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiating emotions in the theory of planned behaviour: evidence of improved prediction in relation to sustainable food consumerism\",\"authors\":\"Mara Martini, Francesco La Barbera, Susanna Schmidt, Chiara Rollero, Angela Fedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bfj-05-2023-0357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and its extensions are often used to explain intentions to perform sustainable behaviours. Emotions can provide the impetus for action and should be considered in high-involvement situations, such as sustainable food purchase decisions. Therefore, the aim of this research work was to investigate whether the addition of different types of emotions (self-related, social and pro-active) to the TPB main constructs – attitude (ATT), subjective norm (SN) and perceived behavioural control (PBC) – improves the explanation of intention to make two sustainable food purchase choices: purchase Fairtrade (FT) products and purchase through solidarity purchasing groups (SPGs). Design/methodology/approach The present investigation was conducted by two studies using online questionnaires and focussing on purchasing FT food products (Study 1) and purchasing food through SPGs (Study 2). Stepwise regression models were run to explain the intention to purchase FT products (Study 1; N = 240) and the intention to purchase through SPGs (Study 2; N = 209). Findings Results show that emotions increase the predictive validity of the TPB model. The study also highlights the importance to distinguish between different types of emotions. Amongst those considered in both studies, only pro-active emotions play a significant role in predicting food purchasing intention. Results encourage further investigation of the role of emotions in TPB-based models for predicting sustainable food purchase choices. Research limitations/implications The measurement of the three classical antecedents of the TPB model (ATT, SNs and PBC) performed by single items can be considered the main limitation of this work. In future research, instruments made up of more items measuring these three theoretical dimensions should be used. In addition, it would be important to conduct an analysis of the beliefs that determine ATTs, norms and perceived control. Originality/value Different from previous studies that considered emotions in extension of the TPB model to explain sustainable behaviours, the present work separately analysed the role of three different kinds of emotions (self-related, social and pro-active) in explaining sustainable food behaviours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Food Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Food Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-05-2023-0357\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Food Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-05-2023-0357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计划行为理论(TPB)及其扩展经常被用来解释执行可持续行为的意图。情绪可以为行动提供动力,在高参与度的情况下,如可持续食品购买决策,应予以考虑。因此,本研究的目的是探讨不同类型的情绪(自我相关的、社会的和积极主动的)加入到TPB的主要构式——态度(ATT)、主观规范(SN)和感知行为控制(PBC)——是否改善了对两种可持续食品购买选择的意向的解释:购买公平贸易(FT)产品和通过团结购买团体(spg)购买。设计/方法/方法本研究通过两项研究进行,使用在线问卷,重点关注购买FT食品(研究1)和通过SPGs购买食品(研究2)。使用逐步回归模型来解释购买FT产品的意愿(研究1;N = 240)和通过spg购买的意向(研究2;N = 209)。结果表明,情绪会提高TPB模型的预测效度。该研究还强调了区分不同类型情绪的重要性。在这两项研究中,只有积极情绪在预测食品购买意愿方面起着重要作用。结果鼓励进一步研究情绪在基于tbp的模型中预测可持续食品购买选择的作用。研究局限/意义TPB模型的三个经典前因变量(ATT、SNs和PBC)的单项目测量可以被认为是本研究的主要局限性。在未来的研究中,应该使用由更多项目组成的工具来测量这三个理论维度。此外,重要的是对决定ats、规范和感知控制的信念进行分析。原创性/价值不同于以往的研究将情绪扩展到TPB模型来解释可持续行为,本研究分别分析了三种不同类型的情绪(自我相关的、社会的和积极的)在解释可持续食物行为中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differentiating emotions in the theory of planned behaviour: evidence of improved prediction in relation to sustainable food consumerism
Purpose The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and its extensions are often used to explain intentions to perform sustainable behaviours. Emotions can provide the impetus for action and should be considered in high-involvement situations, such as sustainable food purchase decisions. Therefore, the aim of this research work was to investigate whether the addition of different types of emotions (self-related, social and pro-active) to the TPB main constructs – attitude (ATT), subjective norm (SN) and perceived behavioural control (PBC) – improves the explanation of intention to make two sustainable food purchase choices: purchase Fairtrade (FT) products and purchase through solidarity purchasing groups (SPGs). Design/methodology/approach The present investigation was conducted by two studies using online questionnaires and focussing on purchasing FT food products (Study 1) and purchasing food through SPGs (Study 2). Stepwise regression models were run to explain the intention to purchase FT products (Study 1; N = 240) and the intention to purchase through SPGs (Study 2; N = 209). Findings Results show that emotions increase the predictive validity of the TPB model. The study also highlights the importance to distinguish between different types of emotions. Amongst those considered in both studies, only pro-active emotions play a significant role in predicting food purchasing intention. Results encourage further investigation of the role of emotions in TPB-based models for predicting sustainable food purchase choices. Research limitations/implications The measurement of the three classical antecedents of the TPB model (ATT, SNs and PBC) performed by single items can be considered the main limitation of this work. In future research, instruments made up of more items measuring these three theoretical dimensions should be used. In addition, it would be important to conduct an analysis of the beliefs that determine ATTs, norms and perceived control. Originality/value Different from previous studies that considered emotions in extension of the TPB model to explain sustainable behaviours, the present work separately analysed the role of three different kinds of emotions (self-related, social and pro-active) in explaining sustainable food behaviours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Food Journal
British Food Journal 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
15.20%
发文量
219
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: After 115 years, the British Food Journal (BFJ) continues to be highly respected worldwide for its broad and unique interdisciplinary coverage of the latest food-related double blind peer-reviewed research. It links all sectors of this dynamic industry, keeping abreast of emerging trends, topical and controversial issues and informing and stimulating debate. - See more at: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=bfj#sthash.O3wH4pEh.dpuf
期刊最新文献
Modulating variables impacting the intersection of health and environmental concerns in organic food purchasing decisions Modulating variables impacting the intersection of health and environmental concerns in organic food purchasing decisions Revealing the organic food consumption intention in Afyonkarahisar: a study on the impact of health, safety, value and attributes Value seeking, health-conscious or sustainability-concerned? Profiling fruit and vegetable consumers in Euro-Mediterranean countries Consumer visual attention to food allergen information on restaurant menus: an eye-tracking study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1