增值税消费间接税。对葡萄牙替代性税率模型的可能研究

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Investment Management and Financial Innovations Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.21511/imfi.20(4).2023.14
Ricardo de Moraes e Soares, Pedro Pinheiro, Paula Heliodoro
{"title":"增值税消费间接税。对葡萄牙替代性税率模型的可能研究","authors":"Ricardo de Moraes e Soares, Pedro Pinheiro, Paula Heliodoro","doi":"10.21511/imfi.20(4).2023.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of a single VAT rate system in the EU is a complex and controversial issue, since the current model includes several differentiated rates and is intended to reflect sectoral needs and ensure greater fairness in the taxation of consumption. This study aims to analyse which of the general consumption tax models (differentiated rates or a single rate) is more efficient in terms of revenue collection. The study uses official statistics available on the official website of the Tax and Customs Authority for the period 1996–2022. VAT revenue is measured by applying the formula of the EU’s common VAT model with the necessary adaptations to the flat rate model. Quantitative methods are applied to verify which of the tax models is more efficient in terms of collection. For this purpose, two scenarios were defined (17% and 21%). The results suggest that the estimated revenues for the proposed flat rate models are higher than the amounts actually collected through the differentiated rates. They also suggest that the 21% flat rate is preferable to the 17% rate, although the latter has the capacity to maintain current revenue levels and increase the amount collected compared to the current system. The conclusions suggest that the single VAT rate model is technically more preferable and notably more efficient than the current common consumption tax model adopted by the European Union. The study concludes that the refusal to adopt the single-rate model is not due to technical reasons but to political ones.","PeriodicalId":39060,"journal":{"name":"Investment Management and Financial Innovations","volume":"71 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indirect taxation on VAT consumption. A possible study of alternative tax rate models in Portugal\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo de Moraes e Soares, Pedro Pinheiro, Paula Heliodoro\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/imfi.20(4).2023.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The adoption of a single VAT rate system in the EU is a complex and controversial issue, since the current model includes several differentiated rates and is intended to reflect sectoral needs and ensure greater fairness in the taxation of consumption. This study aims to analyse which of the general consumption tax models (differentiated rates or a single rate) is more efficient in terms of revenue collection. The study uses official statistics available on the official website of the Tax and Customs Authority for the period 1996–2022. VAT revenue is measured by applying the formula of the EU’s common VAT model with the necessary adaptations to the flat rate model. Quantitative methods are applied to verify which of the tax models is more efficient in terms of collection. For this purpose, two scenarios were defined (17% and 21%). The results suggest that the estimated revenues for the proposed flat rate models are higher than the amounts actually collected through the differentiated rates. They also suggest that the 21% flat rate is preferable to the 17% rate, although the latter has the capacity to maintain current revenue levels and increase the amount collected compared to the current system. The conclusions suggest that the single VAT rate model is technically more preferable and notably more efficient than the current common consumption tax model adopted by the European Union. The study concludes that the refusal to adopt the single-rate model is not due to technical reasons but to political ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investment Management and Financial Innovations\",\"volume\":\"71 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investment Management and Financial Innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(4).2023.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Management and Financial Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(4).2023.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧盟采用单一增值税税率制度是一个复杂而有争议的问题,因为目前的模式包括几种不同的税率,旨在反映部门的需要,并确保对消费征税的更大公平性。本研究旨在分析哪一种一般消费税模式(差别税率或单一税率)在税收方面更有效。该研究使用了1996年至2022年期间税务和海关总署官方网站上的官方统计数据。增值税收入是通过应用欧盟共同增值税模型的公式来衡量的,并对统一税率模型进行了必要的调整。采用定量方法来验证哪一种税收模式在征收方面更有效。为此,定义了两种场景(17%和21%)。结果表明,拟议的统一费率模型的估计收入高于通过差别费率实际收取的金额。他们还建议,21%的统一税率比17%的税率更可取,尽管与现行制度相比,后者有能力维持目前的收入水平,并增加征收的金额。结论表明,单一增值税税率模式在技术上更可取,明显比目前欧盟采用的共同消费税模式更有效。该研究的结论是,拒绝采用单一费率模式不是出于技术原因,而是出于政治原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indirect taxation on VAT consumption. A possible study of alternative tax rate models in Portugal
The adoption of a single VAT rate system in the EU is a complex and controversial issue, since the current model includes several differentiated rates and is intended to reflect sectoral needs and ensure greater fairness in the taxation of consumption. This study aims to analyse which of the general consumption tax models (differentiated rates or a single rate) is more efficient in terms of revenue collection. The study uses official statistics available on the official website of the Tax and Customs Authority for the period 1996–2022. VAT revenue is measured by applying the formula of the EU’s common VAT model with the necessary adaptations to the flat rate model. Quantitative methods are applied to verify which of the tax models is more efficient in terms of collection. For this purpose, two scenarios were defined (17% and 21%). The results suggest that the estimated revenues for the proposed flat rate models are higher than the amounts actually collected through the differentiated rates. They also suggest that the 21% flat rate is preferable to the 17% rate, although the latter has the capacity to maintain current revenue levels and increase the amount collected compared to the current system. The conclusions suggest that the single VAT rate model is technically more preferable and notably more efficient than the current common consumption tax model adopted by the European Union. The study concludes that the refusal to adopt the single-rate model is not due to technical reasons but to political ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal “Investment Management and Financial Innovations” encompasses the results of theoretical and empirical researches carried out both on macro- and micro-levels, concerning various aspects of financial management and corporate governance, investments and innovations (including using of quantitative methods). It is focused on the international community of financiers, both academics and practitioners. Key topics: financial and investment markets; government policy and regulation; corporate governance; information and market efficiency; financial forecasting and simulation; financial institutions: investment companies, investment funds, investment banks, hedge funds, private pension funds; objects of real and financial investing; financial instruments and derivatives; efficiency of investment projects; econometric and statistic methods in project management; alternative investments; ratings and rating agencies.
期刊最新文献
Testing the weak-form efficiency of Arab stock markets after the COVID-19 pandemic The role of financial literacy, digital literacy, and financial self-efficacy in FinTech adoption Optimizing firm performance through contingency factors, enterprise risk management, and intellectual capital in Southeast Asian mining enterprises Does an increase in portfolio volatility create more returns? Evidence from India Impact of intellectual property rights on foreign direct investment in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1