聚醚醚酮(PEEK)填料含量对不同树脂胶结物粘结性能影响的探索性评价

IF 3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES Journal of Composites Science Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.3390/jcs7110456
Marco Dederichs, Oliver Lackner, Harald Kuepper, Mike Decker, Stephanie Viebranz, Christoph-Ludwig Hennig, Arndt Guentsch, Christine Kuepper
{"title":"聚醚醚酮(PEEK)填料含量对不同树脂胶结物粘结性能影响的探索性评价","authors":"Marco Dederichs, Oliver Lackner, Harald Kuepper, Mike Decker, Stephanie Viebranz, Christoph-Ludwig Hennig, Arndt Guentsch, Christine Kuepper","doi":"10.3390/jcs7110456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is considered one of the most innovative prosthetic materials of the last few decades. Its chemically inert behavior and high biocompatibility make it a promising material in many areas of dentistry. The aim of this study was to test whether PEEK with different TiO2 filler contents achieves comparable bond strength values when using different resin cements. N = 70 PEEK samples each with different TiO2 filler content (20 wt.% TiO2 vs. 5 wt.% TiO2 vs. no filler as a control group) were divided into seven groups and cemented with various conventional (ResiCem, RelyX Ultimate, Variolink Esthetic DC) and self-adhesive resin cements (RelyXUnicem 2, Bifix SE, Panavia SA Cement Plus, SpeedCem). The shear strength of the bond was assessed after 24 h and after 25,000 thermal loading cycles. Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis (significance level: α = 0.05). PEEK without filler showed the highest mean shear strength (24.26 MPa using RelyX Ultimate), then high-filled PEEK (22.90 MPa using ResiCem) and low-filled PEEK (21.76 MPa using RelyX Ultimate). Conventional resin cements generally achieved slightly higher adhesive strengths than self-adhesive resin cements. It appears that the filler content does not affects the adhesive bond strengths.","PeriodicalId":15435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Composites Science","volume":"20 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Explorative Evaluation on the Influence of Filler Content of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) on Adhesive Bond to Different Luting Resin Cements\",\"authors\":\"Marco Dederichs, Oliver Lackner, Harald Kuepper, Mike Decker, Stephanie Viebranz, Christoph-Ludwig Hennig, Arndt Guentsch, Christine Kuepper\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcs7110456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is considered one of the most innovative prosthetic materials of the last few decades. Its chemically inert behavior and high biocompatibility make it a promising material in many areas of dentistry. The aim of this study was to test whether PEEK with different TiO2 filler contents achieves comparable bond strength values when using different resin cements. N = 70 PEEK samples each with different TiO2 filler content (20 wt.% TiO2 vs. 5 wt.% TiO2 vs. no filler as a control group) were divided into seven groups and cemented with various conventional (ResiCem, RelyX Ultimate, Variolink Esthetic DC) and self-adhesive resin cements (RelyXUnicem 2, Bifix SE, Panavia SA Cement Plus, SpeedCem). The shear strength of the bond was assessed after 24 h and after 25,000 thermal loading cycles. Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis (significance level: α = 0.05). PEEK without filler showed the highest mean shear strength (24.26 MPa using RelyX Ultimate), then high-filled PEEK (22.90 MPa using ResiCem) and low-filled PEEK (21.76 MPa using RelyX Ultimate). Conventional resin cements generally achieved slightly higher adhesive strengths than self-adhesive resin cements. It appears that the filler content does not affects the adhesive bond strengths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Composites Science\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Composites Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7110456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Composites Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7110456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聚醚醚酮(PEEK)被认为是过去几十年来最具创新性的假体材料之一。它的化学惰性和高生物相容性使其成为牙科许多领域的有前途的材料。本研究的目的是测试不同TiO2填料含量的PEEK在使用不同的树脂胶结物时是否能达到相同的粘结强度值。N = 70个不同TiO2填充物含量的PEEK样品(对照组为20wt .% TiO2 vs. 5wt .% TiO2 vs.无填充物)分为7组,用各种常规(ResiCem, RelyX Ultimate, Variolink thetic DC)和自粘树脂水泥(RelyXUnicem 2, Bifix SE, Panavia SA Cement Plus, SpeedCem)进行胶结。在24 h和25000次热加载循环后,评估了粘结剂的抗剪强度。采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Wilcoxon检验进行统计学分析(显著性水平:α = 0.05)。无填料PEEK的平均抗剪强度最高(使用RelyX Ultimate为24.26 MPa),其次是高填充PEEK(使用ResiCem为22.90 MPa)和低填充PEEK(使用RelyX Ultimate为21.76 MPa)。常规树脂胶结剂通常比自粘树脂胶结剂具有稍高的粘接强度。可见填料含量对胶粘剂的粘结强度没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Explorative Evaluation on the Influence of Filler Content of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) on Adhesive Bond to Different Luting Resin Cements
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is considered one of the most innovative prosthetic materials of the last few decades. Its chemically inert behavior and high biocompatibility make it a promising material in many areas of dentistry. The aim of this study was to test whether PEEK with different TiO2 filler contents achieves comparable bond strength values when using different resin cements. N = 70 PEEK samples each with different TiO2 filler content (20 wt.% TiO2 vs. 5 wt.% TiO2 vs. no filler as a control group) were divided into seven groups and cemented with various conventional (ResiCem, RelyX Ultimate, Variolink Esthetic DC) and self-adhesive resin cements (RelyXUnicem 2, Bifix SE, Panavia SA Cement Plus, SpeedCem). The shear strength of the bond was assessed after 24 h and after 25,000 thermal loading cycles. Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis (significance level: α = 0.05). PEEK without filler showed the highest mean shear strength (24.26 MPa using RelyX Ultimate), then high-filled PEEK (22.90 MPa using ResiCem) and low-filled PEEK (21.76 MPa using RelyX Ultimate). Conventional resin cements generally achieved slightly higher adhesive strengths than self-adhesive resin cements. It appears that the filler content does not affects the adhesive bond strengths.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Composites Science
Journal of Composites Science MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
328
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preparation, Characterization and Evaluation of Polyamide-Reduced Graphene Oxide as Selective Membranes for Water Purification Effects of Low-Velocity-Impact on Facesheet-Core Debonding of Natural-Core Composite Sandwich Structures—A Review of Experimental Research Friction Stir Spot Welding of Thin Aluminium Sheets to Polyamide 6: A Study of the Welding Parameters and Strategies Study on Machining Quality in Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Jute-Polymer Composite and Optimization of Process Parameters through Grey Relational Analysis Tuning the Tensile and Shear Properties of a Scar Healing Composite for Mechanotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1