适应力强和挣扎中的俄罗斯学校的教学效果差异

IF 2.4 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Leadership in Education Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1080/13603124.2023.2254736
Aleksandra Mikhaylova, Roman Zvyagintsev, Ìarina Pinskaya, Lorin Anderson
{"title":"适应力强和挣扎中的俄罗斯学校的教学效果差异","authors":"Aleksandra Mikhaylova, Roman Zvyagintsev, Ìarina Pinskaya, Lorin Anderson","doi":"10.1080/13603124.2023.2254736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our research is dedicated to identifying what allows schools operating in difficult social conditions to show good academic results. We answer this question through the conjugation of two theoretical frameworks: academic resilience and school effectiveness. We analyze several models of school effectiveness and compare resilient and struggling schools through them. The study uses a quantitative and qualitative mixed-methods design. Our main arguments are based on an analysis of interviews conducted with students, parents, teachers, and principals in different schools—3 resilient and 3 struggling. We conclude that the schools differ in the strategies they implement; the main problem facing struggling schools is not the lack of effective elements, but the presence of negative ones; in further studies of school effectiveness, it would be worth using an integrative model that combines both poles.","PeriodicalId":46848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Leadership in Education","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in school effectiveness between resilient and struggling Russian schools\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandra Mikhaylova, Roman Zvyagintsev, Ìarina Pinskaya, Lorin Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13603124.2023.2254736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our research is dedicated to identifying what allows schools operating in difficult social conditions to show good academic results. We answer this question through the conjugation of two theoretical frameworks: academic resilience and school effectiveness. We analyze several models of school effectiveness and compare resilient and struggling schools through them. The study uses a quantitative and qualitative mixed-methods design. Our main arguments are based on an analysis of interviews conducted with students, parents, teachers, and principals in different schools—3 resilient and 3 struggling. We conclude that the schools differ in the strategies they implement; the main problem facing struggling schools is not the lack of effective elements, but the presence of negative ones; in further studies of school effectiveness, it would be worth using an integrative model that combines both poles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Leadership in Education\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Leadership in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2254736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Leadership in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2254736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的研究致力于找出是什么让在困难的社会条件下运作的学校表现出良好的学术成绩。我们通过结合两个理论框架来回答这个问题:学业弹性和学校有效性。我们分析了学校有效性的几种模型,并通过它们比较有弹性和挣扎的学校。本研究采用定量与定性混合方法设计。我们的主要论点是基于对不同学校的学生、家长、老师和校长的访谈分析——3个有弹性,3个挣扎。我们得出的结论是,学校在实施策略方面存在差异;困难学校面临的主要问题不是缺乏有效因素,而是存在消极因素;在对学校有效性的进一步研究中,使用一种结合这两个极端的综合模型是值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in school effectiveness between resilient and struggling Russian schools
Our research is dedicated to identifying what allows schools operating in difficult social conditions to show good academic results. We answer this question through the conjugation of two theoretical frameworks: academic resilience and school effectiveness. We analyze several models of school effectiveness and compare resilient and struggling schools through them. The study uses a quantitative and qualitative mixed-methods design. Our main arguments are based on an analysis of interviews conducted with students, parents, teachers, and principals in different schools—3 resilient and 3 struggling. We conclude that the schools differ in the strategies they implement; the main problem facing struggling schools is not the lack of effective elements, but the presence of negative ones; in further studies of school effectiveness, it would be worth using an integrative model that combines both poles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Leadership in Education
International Journal of Leadership in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory & Practice is an international journal for the publication of theoretical and practical discussions of educational leadership. The Journal presents: •cutting-edge writing on educational leadership, including instructional supervision, curriculum and teaching development, staff development, educational administration and more; •an alternative voice: reports of alternative theoretical perspectives, alternative methodologies, and alternative experiences of leadership; •a broad definition of leadership, including teachers-as-leaders, shared governance, site-based decision making, and community-school collaborations.
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 and school leadership: a tale of transition Women cannibalized! The troubling link between Queen Bees and mentoring in Pakistani academia The view of leadership on teaching newly arrived migrant students in preschools and schools A review of empirical studies of co-principalship: antecedents, constellation-level outcomes and the issue of trust Enhancing affective commitment through transcendental leadership: unveiling the influence of altruistic mindset and intrinsic motivation in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1