来自不同亚洲和欧洲国家的森林文化的见解:国家森林采伐战略和新方法

Majid LOTFALİAN, Jorn ERLER, Tibor PENTEK, Abdullah Emin AKAY, Rodolfo PİCHİO, Tomislav PORŠİNSKY
{"title":"来自不同亚洲和欧洲国家的森林文化的见解:国家森林采伐战略和新方法","authors":"Majid LOTFALİAN, Jorn ERLER, Tibor PENTEK, Abdullah Emin AKAY, Rodolfo PİCHİO, Tomislav PORŠİNSKY","doi":"10.33904/ejfe.1335766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the forestry approaches have been formed according to the demands and aspirations of the society, the forest sector implies different concerns such as social, economic, and environmental. Harvesting and extraction of wood at low-cost, protection of stands against degradation and changes in land use, proper implementation of afforestation and forest extension, conservation of endemic species, preservation of soil, providing jobs, and supporting national and domestic development were the cases that, depending on the time and area conditions, have a different priority for foresters. Of course, all this has always been discussed by the shareholders in the forest sector with the main attention to forest sustainability. But the question is: are forestry approaches compatible with the changes in the world today? Today, with increasing environmental concerns, as discussed at the Glasgow 2021 Conference, the importance of forests and their protection has doubled, and it seems that forestry practices in the world need a new approach. In addition to climate change, increasing human population and regional and global economic changes affect the use of forests and the form of forest management and utilization.
 This paper aimed to take an analytical look at this issue and examine the current situation in five countries. It was also targeted with the help of the DPSIR Framework to elaborate the social consequences of the situation and analysis was presented about what to do or not. The emphasis of this paper is that forest managers and policymakers need to modify and adapt the plans and methods in a way that is appropriate to the progress of time and its changes, while protecting forests and ensuring their sustainability, limiting non-professionals from involving directly in the decision-making process.","PeriodicalId":36173,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":"217 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights from the Silviculture of Different Asian and European Countries: National Forest Harvesting Strategies and New Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Majid LOTFALİAN, Jorn ERLER, Tibor PENTEK, Abdullah Emin AKAY, Rodolfo PİCHİO, Tomislav PORŠİNSKY\",\"doi\":\"10.33904/ejfe.1335766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the forestry approaches have been formed according to the demands and aspirations of the society, the forest sector implies different concerns such as social, economic, and environmental. Harvesting and extraction of wood at low-cost, protection of stands against degradation and changes in land use, proper implementation of afforestation and forest extension, conservation of endemic species, preservation of soil, providing jobs, and supporting national and domestic development were the cases that, depending on the time and area conditions, have a different priority for foresters. Of course, all this has always been discussed by the shareholders in the forest sector with the main attention to forest sustainability. But the question is: are forestry approaches compatible with the changes in the world today? Today, with increasing environmental concerns, as discussed at the Glasgow 2021 Conference, the importance of forests and their protection has doubled, and it seems that forestry practices in the world need a new approach. In addition to climate change, increasing human population and regional and global economic changes affect the use of forests and the form of forest management and utilization.
 This paper aimed to take an analytical look at this issue and examine the current situation in five countries. It was also targeted with the help of the DPSIR Framework to elaborate the social consequences of the situation and analysis was presented about what to do or not. The emphasis of this paper is that forest managers and policymakers need to modify and adapt the plans and methods in a way that is appropriate to the progress of time and its changes, while protecting forests and ensuring their sustainability, limiting non-professionals from involving directly in the decision-making process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Forest Engineering\",\"volume\":\"217 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Forest Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1335766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1335766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于林业方法是根据社会的要求和愿望而形成的,因此林业部门隐含着社会、经济和环境等不同的关注点。以低成本采伐和提取木材、保护林分不退化和土地使用变化、适当实施造林和森林扩展、养护特有物种、保存土壤、提供就业机会和支持国家和国内发展,这些情况视时间和地区情况而定,对林业工作者具有不同的优先事项。当然,森林部门的股东一直在讨论这一切,主要关注森林的可持续性。但问题是:林业方法是否与当今世界的变化相适应?今天,正如2021年格拉斯哥会议所讨论的那样,随着环境问题日益严重,森林及其保护的重要性增加了一倍,世界林业实践似乎需要一种新的方法。除气候变化外,人口的增加以及区域和全球经济的变化也影响着森林的利用以及森林管理和利用的形式。本文旨在对这一问题进行分析,并考察五个国家的现状。在DPSIR框架的帮助下,它也有针对性地阐述了这种情况的社会后果,并分析了该做什么或不该做什么。本文的重点是,森林管理者和决策者需要以一种适合时间进展及其变化的方式修改和调整计划和方法,同时保护森林并确保其可持续性,限制非专业人员直接参与决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insights from the Silviculture of Different Asian and European Countries: National Forest Harvesting Strategies and New Approaches
As the forestry approaches have been formed according to the demands and aspirations of the society, the forest sector implies different concerns such as social, economic, and environmental. Harvesting and extraction of wood at low-cost, protection of stands against degradation and changes in land use, proper implementation of afforestation and forest extension, conservation of endemic species, preservation of soil, providing jobs, and supporting national and domestic development were the cases that, depending on the time and area conditions, have a different priority for foresters. Of course, all this has always been discussed by the shareholders in the forest sector with the main attention to forest sustainability. But the question is: are forestry approaches compatible with the changes in the world today? Today, with increasing environmental concerns, as discussed at the Glasgow 2021 Conference, the importance of forests and their protection has doubled, and it seems that forestry practices in the world need a new approach. In addition to climate change, increasing human population and regional and global economic changes affect the use of forests and the form of forest management and utilization. This paper aimed to take an analytical look at this issue and examine the current situation in five countries. It was also targeted with the help of the DPSIR Framework to elaborate the social consequences of the situation and analysis was presented about what to do or not. The emphasis of this paper is that forest managers and policymakers need to modify and adapt the plans and methods in a way that is appropriate to the progress of time and its changes, while protecting forests and ensuring their sustainability, limiting non-professionals from involving directly in the decision-making process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Forest Engineering
European Journal of Forest Engineering Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Developing a new harvester head for tree felling Heat-Resilient Workforce: Unveiling the Relationships Between Heat-related Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Precautionary Behavior in Indonesian Pine Forest Workers An Internet of Things Platform for Forest Protection Potential of Geospatial technologies in Mechanized Timber harvesting planning Productivity Analysis of Mid-Size Cable Yarding Operation based on UAV-captured Video Sequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1